Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/620,625

RELIABLE HIGH SPEED ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2023 — CN 202310334313.X +1 more
Examiner
TA, THO DAC
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Amphenol Commercial Products (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1347 granted / 1557 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1567
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1557 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 19, line 1, change “manufacutring” to –manufacturing--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the sealant" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13, 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (US 20220263260 A1). In regard to claim 13, Wang discloses an electrical connector 100 comprising: a housing 102 comprising a mating face, a mounting face 202 opposite the mating face 118, and a plurality of channels 106 (see fig. 5A) extending to the mounting face 202; a plurality of conductive elements 104 disposed in respective channels 106 of the plurality of channels of the housing 102, each of the plurality of conductive elements 104 comprising a mating end 302, a mounting end 206 opposite the mating end and extending out of the plurality of channels at the mounting face, and an intermediate portion 304 joining the mating end 302 and mounting end 206; and a seal 400 disposed at the mounting face 202 of the housing 102, wherein, for each of the plurality of conductive elements 104: a subportion (see annotated drawing below) of the intermediate portion 304 directly connected to the mounting end 206 is embedded in the seal 400 (see fig. 3D). In regard to claim 15, Wang discloses for each of the plurality of conductive elements 104; the mounting end 206 is narrower than the subportion of the intermediate portion 304. In regard to claim 16, Wang discloses the intermediate portion 304 abuts the plastic of the seal 400 and a respective side wall 110 of the housing 102 on opposite sides (see fig. 3D). In regard to claim 17, Wang discloses the plastic of the seal 400 comprises a platform portion and a peripheral portion surrounding the platform portion (see fig. 4A and 4B); and the intermediate portion 304 is at least partial disposed between the peripheral portion of the plastic of the seal and the respective side wall 110 of the housing 102. [AltContent: textbox (subportion)][AltContent: connector] PNG media_image1.png 724 684 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12, 19, 20 are allowed. Claims 14, 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regard to claim 1, the prior art fails to provide, teach or suggest a seal disposed at the mounting face, the seal comprising a first sealing element and a second sealing element at least partially disposed on the first sealing element. In regard to claim 19, the prior art fails to provide, teach or suggest disposing a seal at the mounting face of the housing comprising flowing a sealant around subportions of the intermediate portions of the plurality of conductive elements. In regard to claim 14, the prior art fails to provide, teach or suggest the seal comprises plastic and sealant connected to the plastic; and the subportions of the intermediate portions of the plurality of conductive elements are embedded in the sealant of the seal. In regard to claim 18, the prior art fails to provide, teach or suggest the sealant is stacked on the peripheral portion of the plastic; and the platform portion of the plastic is thicker than the stack of the sealant and the peripheral portion of the plastic. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO D. TA whose telephone number is (571)272-2014. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-4:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdt 7/14/2026 /THO D TA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695218
COMBINATION TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689145
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683325
CONNECTOR RETAINER CAP ASSEMBLY
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683303
CONDUCTOR TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683327
CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.1%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1557 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month