Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/623,046

LENS UNIT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 01, 2024
Priority
Apr 03, 2023 — JP 2023-059821
Examiner
NGUYEN, DUNG T
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
NIDEC INSTRUMENTS Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1328 granted / 1615 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1649
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1615 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s response dated 07/21/2026 has been received and entered. Claims 1-7 are remaining pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(A)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Horiuchi et al., US 2016/0349475 A1, as stated in the previous office action. Claim 1 is anticipated by Horiuchi et al. figures 1A-1B, 2 and accompanying text which discloses a lens unit 1 comprising: . a lens barrel 7 made of a resin (Abstract) . a first lens 15 held on an inner peripheral side of the lens barrel 7 . wherein when a direction along an optical axis L of the first lens 15 is defined as an optical axis direction, the first lens is supported from an image side L2 at a predetermined first position in the optical axis direction L . on an inner peripheral surface 73 of the lens barrel 7, a first inner peripheral-surface 737 portion located on an outer side in a radial direction of the first lens 7 is a tapered surface (corresponding to part 77/78 reducing thickness of the tube wall 73 from upper wall 73a to end side 730) which is inclined to an outer peripheral side toward an object side (fig. 2). . the first inner peripheral-surface portion 737 comprises first fitting protrusions 77 which are pressure-joined to the first lens at a plurality of spots separated in a circumferential direction ([0019]) . the plurality of first fitting protrusions 77 position the first lens in the radial direction (fig 2). Re claim 2, wherein each of the first fitting protrusions comprises a pressure-joining surface parallel to the optical axis of the first lens ([0019], [0041]) Re claims 3 and 6, wherein each of the first fitting protrusions comprises a curved surface which is curved toward the outer peripheral side from the pressure-joining surface toward the object side. It is noted that the fitting protrusions are formed on the inner tube part 73, as so the fitting protrusion would be curved as curved along with the inner tube. Re claim 4, Horiuchi et al. also disclose a second lens 13 held on an inner peripheral side of the lens barrel 7, wherein the second lens 13 is supported from the image side L2 at a second position closer to an object side L1 in the optical axis direction L than the first position (corresponding to the first lens 15) on the inner peripheral surface of the lens barrel 7, a second inner peripheral-surface portion located on an outer side in a radial direction of the second lens is a tapered surface (corresponding to part 78) inclined to the outer peripheral side toward the object side; the second inner peripheral-surface portion comprises second fitting protrusions 78 pressure-joined to the second lens at a plurality of spots separated in the circumferential direction; the plurality of second fitting protrusions position the second lens in the radial direction; and a first inclination angle at which the first inner peripheral-surface portion is inclined with respect to the optical axis and a second inclination angle at which the second inner peripheral-surface portion is inclined with respect to the optical axis are different from each other (fig 2). Re claims 5 and 7, wherein the lens barrel 7 comprises an annular facing surface (e.g., tube) which faces an outer peripheral-edge portion of the first lens 15 from the image side, the annular facing surface comprises positioning protrusions which are brought into contact with the first lens and position the first lens in the optical axis direction, at a plurality of spots 18 in the circumferential direction, and the positioning protrusions overlap the first fitting protrusions when viewed from the optical axis direction (fig. 2). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/21/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s only argument is that Horiuchi fails to disclose “a first inner peripheral-surface portion located on an outer side in a radial direction of the first lens is a tapered surface which is inclined to an outer peripheral side toward an object side” (e.g., Horiuchi's portion 737 is not a tapered surface, nor is the press-fitted portion 77 a tapered surface). The Examiner is not convinced by this argument since the same is true of the Horiuchi et al. tapered surface which is inclined to an outer peripheral side toward an object side. Particularly, as stated above, the inner peripheral surface portion 73 having a diameter that reduced thickness (i.e., tapered) from the top to the bottom (e.g., object side) and having an inclined part(e.g., 78 between 73a and 737 and/or inclined part corresponding to 77 between wall 737 and bottom end wall)(fig 1A). In other words, the Horiuchi et al. inner peripheral surface would be the same as claimed as well. Accordingly, claims 1-7 stand rejection as stated above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUNG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2297. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUNG T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 21, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769169
FUNCTIONAL LAYER AND METHOD FOR CONTACTING A FUNCTIONAL LAYER
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760186
LIQUID DISPERSION OF FLUORIDE PARTICLES, COMPOSITION FOR FORMING OPTICAL FILM, AND OPTICAL FILM
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12748336
FRONT LIGHT MODULE AND ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742977
Image Projection
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741513
VEHICLE WINDOW ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1615 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month