Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/623,196

ELECTRONIC DEVICE WORN ON THE BODY, HEARING AID INSTRUMENT, AND VOLTAGE SUPPLY FOR SUCH A DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 01, 2024
Examiner
O NEILL, PATRICK
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sivantos Pte. LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
469 granted / 564 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
573
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§102
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 564 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 6. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoshio (US Patent No. 8,115,461). a) regarding claim 15: Yoshio discloses a voltage supply (116 in Figures 1 and 2) for an electronic device to be worn on the body of a user, the voltage supply comprising: a charge pump (140A in Figure 7) for converting a battery voltage (VDD) by a conversion factor to an intermediate voltage (VCPO), said charge pump being configured for changing over between at least two stages of the conversion factor (column 15, line 64-column 16, line 3); a voltage regulator (135 in Figure 3) for reducing the intermediate voltage (VCPO) to an output voltage (VREG1) of a predefined setpoint value; and a controller (143 in Figure 7) for reversibly changing over said charge pump (140A) between the at least two stages of the conversion factor, said controller (143) being configured to actuate said charge pump (140A) in accordance with a manipulated variable (IO_SENSE) of said voltage regulator (column 17, line 63-column 18, line 16); said charge pump (140A) is configured to be changed over between a first stage with a lower value of the conversion factor and a second stage with a higher value of the conversion factor (column 17, line 63-column 18, line 11); said controller (143) is configured to maintain the second stage of the conversion factor at least for a predefined delay time (column 16, lines 38-51 and column 17, line 63-column 18, line 11). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/20/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicants argue that, “In summary, none of the references, whether taken alone or in any combination, either show or suggest the features of claims 1 and 15. Claims 1 and 15 are, therefore, patentable over the art and since all of the dependent claims are ultimately dependent on claims 1 and 15, they are patentable as well.” The Examiner respectfully disagrees. The limitations of claim 15 were previously presented and rejected in dependent claim 7. Applicant's arguments fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.111(b) because they amount to a general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8-14 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious a voltage supply, wherein said controller is configured to set the second stage of the conversion factor if the manipulated variable of said voltage regulator exceeds a first, higher reference value, and to set the first stage of the conversion factor if the manipulated variable of the voltage regulator falls below a second, lower reference value, along with all the other limitations as required by claim 1. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patrick O'Neill whose telephone number is (571)270-1677. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Friday 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln Donovan can be reached at (571)272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK O NEILL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590848
TEMPERATURE SENSOR AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR EXECUTING TRIMMING OPERATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587196
THIN OXIDE LOW VOLTAGE TO HIGH VOLTAGE LEVEL SHIFTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587038
POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS, POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588140
ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT INTERFACES WITH FLEXIBLE INPUT SIGNAL CONDITIONING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567862
LEVEL SHIFTING CIRCUIT MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.6%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 564 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month