Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/623,377

THREE DIMENSIONAL AWARE VIDEO COMPOSITING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 01, 2024
Examiner
LETT, THOMAS J
Art Unit
2611
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Adobe Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
47%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
599 granted / 719 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -36% lift
Without
With
+-36.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
745
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§103
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§102
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 719 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Vachha “Creating Visual Effects with Neural Radiance Fields”, 2023. Regarding claim 18, Vachha discloses one or more computer-readable storage media storing instructions (Blender add-on script allows for more controlled camera trajectories of photorealistic scenes, compositing meshes and other environmental effects with NeRFs, and compositing multiple NeRFs in a single scene, page 1, column 2, line 9-12) that, responsive to execution by a processing device (NeRF objects and environments in a single scene. This is achieved by rendering an RGB render and an accumulation render for each of the cropped NeRF objects, page 2, column 1, lines 23-26), causes the processing device to perform operations comprising generating a composite video using a machine-learning model (composites featuring portal effects, NeRF objects floating in NeRF environments, and NeRFs composited into real-life footage such as an elevator interior as seen in Figure 4) by synchronizing movement of a viewpoint in relation to a subject captured in a subject video (By aligning the NeRF camera path with the virtual Blender camera, page 1, column 2; transforming the Blender camera path coordinate system to be relative to the origin of the NeRF representation in the Blender scene for each frame in the render, page 2, column 2, lines 1-3) with a three-dimensional representation of an environment generated from an environment video (NeRF representations can be imported into 3D creation tools, page 1, column 2). Regarding claim 19, Vachha discloses the one or more computer-readable media as described in claim 18, wherein the three-dimensional representation is configured as a neural radiance field (NeuralRadianceFields(NeRFs) [Mildenhalletal.2021] have emerged as a popular research area in graphics for constructing 3D environments and objects, page 1, column 1). Regarding claim 20, Vachha discloses the one or more computer-readable media as described in claim 19, wherein the neural radiance field is configured as a trained model using machine learning (VFX pipelines using Nerfstudio, an open-source framework for training and rendering NeRFs [Tancik et al. 2023]. The approach involves using Blender3, a widely used 3D creation software, to align camera paths and composite NeRF renders with meshes and other NeRFs, allowing for seamless integration of NeRFs into traditional VFXpipelines, page 1, column 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art of record, namely, Jobe et al. (US 20160037148 A1). discloses a method comprising: producing, by a processing device (computer system 40), subject data defining a subject depicted in frames of a subject video and viewpoint data describing movement of a viewpoint with respect to the frames of the subject video (expand the utility of front/rear projection used in video filming by correcting the projected image to adjust for the perspective shift of the physical on-set camera, para. 0027; For example, as the virtual camera pans left, the rendered image will pan left. As the virtual camera moves laterally, the rendered backplate will change to reflect the new visual field of the virtual camera, para. 0028); forming, by the processing device, three-dimensional data defining a three- dimensional representation of an environment (figure 3) depicted in frames of an environment video (paras. 0025, 0031, 0040); generating, by the processing device, a composited video by aligning the environment with the movement of the viewpoint of the subject based on the subject data and the three-dimensional data (creating a believable integration of the subject and backplate composite image, para. 0027; combining the "displayed" image of the subject onto the focal plane and dynamically moving the virtual camera and focal plane through the 3D environment according to the on-set camera's physical movements, the computer is able to render a composite image that looks like the subject is occupying the 3D environment. In this example, the image of the physical world (i.e., what the on- set camera is seeing and recording on-set of the subject) is pulled into the 3D digital environment and composited into a 2D image that maintains the same perspective of both cameras, para. 0029; see also figures 8 and 9); and rendering, by the processing device, the composited video (the rendered backplate will change to reflect the new visual field of the virtual camera. It is possible to perform real-time rendering from a virtual camera in a 3D environment, and this process may be used for real-time compositing of a filming subject on a green-screen stage, paras. 0028-0029). However, the closest prior art of record, namely, Jobe et al. does not disclose “producing, by a processing device, subject data defining a subject depicted in frames of a subject video and viewpoint data describing movement of a viewpoint with respect to the frames of the subject video." (in combination with the other claimed limitations and/or features), as claimed in independent claim 1. Dependent claims 2-10 are allowable as they depend from an allowable base independent claim 1. Independent claim 11 is citing the same or similar subject matter and are also allowed. Dependent claims 12-17 are allowable as they depend from an allowable base independent claim 11. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS J LETT whose telephone number is (571)272-7464. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tammy Goddard can be reached at (571) 272-7773. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS J LETT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 12, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602714
LIGHTING AND INTERNET OF THINGS DESIGN USING AUGMENTED REALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12570401
Robot and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Systems for Cell Sites and Towers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567217
SMART CONTENT RENDERING ON AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561867
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY ADDING TEXT CONTENT TO GENERATED IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555276
Image Generation Method and Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
47%
With Interview (-36.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 719 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month