Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/624,856

LOADING DEVICES AND METHODS FOR LOADING A STENT-GRAFT INTO A GRAFT COVER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 28, 2023 — provisional 63/516,414
Examiner
WILSON, LEE D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medtronic Vascular Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1482 granted / 1853 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1872
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1853 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 8-11 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. The device is a tool which deploys a stent and the claims are later modify the tool device to have a stent which is not part of the tool. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Walsten 5938180. Walsten discloses the claimed invention as recited in the claims as shown below: 1. A loading device for loading a graft-stent into a graft cover, the loading device comprising: an eye shaft 34 including an eyelet 40 disposed at a first end of the eye shaft; an adjustment shaft 20, wherein a first portion 30 of the adjustment shaft is adjustably coupled to a second end of the eye shaft opposite the first end of the eye shaft such that an overall length of the loading device may be lengthened or shortened via the adjustment shaft; and a rod 14 coupled to a second portion of the adjustment shaft opposite the first portion of the adjustment shaft. 3. The loading device of claim 1, wherein the eyelet includes a gap configured to receive a suture therethrough. See Fig.4 4. The loading device of claim 1, wherein the second end of the eye shaft includes a first threaded portion 36 and the first portion of the adjustment shaft includes a second threaded portion 21 configured to engage the first threaded portion to adjustably couple the adjustment shaft and the eye shaft. 5. The loading device of claim 4, wherein the eye shaft includes a cavity at the second end, wherein the first threaded portion 36 is disposed within the cavity, and wherein the first portion of the adjustment shaft is configured to be received within the cavity such that the second threaded portion engages the first threaded portion to adjustably couple the adjustment shaft and the eye shaft. See Fig.4 6. The loading device of claim 1, wherein the second portion of the adjustment shaft includes a rod cavity 16, wherein the rod is configured to be disposed in the rod cavity to couple the rod to the adjustment shaft. 7. The loading device of claim 6, wherein the rod is configured to be press fit into the rod cavity to couple the rod to the adjustment shaft. See Fig.2 8. The loading device of claim 1, further comprising: a stent-graft including a stent coupled to a graft material, the stent comprising a plurality of struts coupled to each other at crowns; and a suture, wherein the suture is configured to be threaded through a plurality of the crowns at a first end of the stent-graft and to the eyelet of the eye shaft, and wherein lengthening the overall length of the loading device via the adjustment shaft and the eye shaft is configured to make the suture taut and to radially converge the crowns at the first end of the stent-graft. 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 9. The loading device of claim 8, wherein a first end and a second end of the suture are coupled to each other adjacent the eyelet, and wherein a middle portion of the suture is threaded through the crowns at the first end of the stent. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 10. The loading device of claim 8, wherein the stent comprises a plurality of stent rings, wherein the suture is coupled to the crowns of one of the plurality of stent rings at the first end of the stent-graft. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 11. The loading device of claim 8, wherein the suture comprises a plurality of sutures. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 12. A loading device for loading a graft-stent into a graft cover, the loading device comprising: a proximal shaft 20 see Fig.6 having a first eyelet 20 see Fig.6 disposed at a proximal end of the proximal shaft; a distal eye shaft 42 See Fig.6 top including a second eyelet 42 See Fig.6 bottom disposed at a distal end of the distal eye shaft; a distal adjustment shaft, second 20 See Fig.6 wherein a distal portion of the distal adjustment shaft is adjustably coupled to a proximal end of the distal eye shaft opposite the distal end of the eye shaft such that an overall length of the loading device may be lengthened or shortened via the distal adjustment shaft; and a rod 14 having a proximal portion coupled to a distal end of the proximal shaft and a distal portion coupled to a proximal portion of the distal adjustment shaft. 13. The loading device of claim 12, wherein the distal eyelet includes a gap configured to receive a suture therethrough. See Fig.6 where 12 goes into 20 14. The loading device of claim 12, wherein the proximal end of the eye shaft includes a first threaded portion and the distal portion of the adjustment shaft includes a second threaded portion configured to engage the first threaded portion to adjustably couple the distal adjustment shaft and the distal eye shaft. The threaded portion in element 42 reads on this. 15. The loading device of claim 14, wherein the distal eye shaft includes a cavity 16 at the proximal end thereof, wherein the first threaded portion is disposed within the cavity, and wherein the distal portion of the adjustment shaft is configured to be received within the cavity such that the second threaded portion engages the first threaded portion to adjustably couple the distal adjustment shaft and the distal eye shaft. See Fig.6 16. The loading device of claim 12, wherein the proximal portion of the distal adjustment shaft includes a first rod cavity, wherein the distal portion of the rod is configured to be disposed in the first rod cavity to couple the rod to the distal adjustment shaft, and wherein the distal end of the proximal shaft include a second rod cavity, wherein the proximal portion of the rod is configured to be disposed in the second rod cavity to couple the rod to the proximal shaft. See Fig.2 17. The loading device of claim 16, wherein the distal portion of the rod is configured to be press fit into the first rod cavity to couple the rod to the distal adjustment shaft, and the proximal portion of the rod is configured to be press fit into the second rod cavity to couple the rod to the proximal shaft. See Fig.2 18. The loading device of claim 12, further comprising: a stent-graft including a stent coupled to a graft material, the stent comprising a plurality of struts coupled to each other at crowns; and a suture, wherein the suture is configured to be threaded through a plurality of the crowns at a proximal end of the stent-graft, extend proximally to the first eyelet, loop through the first eyelet, extend distally past the stent-graft and to the second eyelet at the distal end of the distal eye shaft, and wherein lengthening the overall length of the loading device via the distal adjustment shaft and the distal eye shaft is configured to make the suture taut and to radially converge the crowns at the proximal end of the stent. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 19. The loading device of claim 18, wherein a first end and a second end of the suture are coupled to each other adjacent the second eyelet, and wherein a middle portion of the suture is threaded through the crowns at the proximal end of the stent-graft. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. 20. The loading device of claim 18, wherein the stent comprises a plurality of stent rings, wherein the suture is coupled to the crowns of one of the plurality of stent rings at the proximal end of the stent-graft. . 112 4 th par. The device is not being modified or further limited so the prior art will meet it because any workpiece can be added to the device. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The 892 form discloses prior art being made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEE D WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4499. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6;30-4;30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN KELLER can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEE D. WILSON Examiner Art Unit 3723 Ldw /LEE D WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723 June 1, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678901
Workpiece Holding Device and Workpiece Conveyance Device
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681350
FRICTIONAL ALIGNMENT DEVICE FOR CURVED SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674525
SYSTEM TO ALIGN AND INSTALL LARGE PIPE FITTINGS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677638
VACUUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND TILT ADJUSTMENT METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667924
ASSEMBLY TABLE DROP-DOWN PLATFORM
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1853 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month