Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/624,917

CHANNEL AWARE MODULATION ORDER SELECTION

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 02, 2024
Examiner
AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
546 granted / 660 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
670
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant should submit an argument under the heading “Remarks” pointing out disagreements with the examiner’s contentions. Applicant must also discuss the references applied against the claims, explaining how the claims avoid the references or distinguish from them. In the remarks filed on February 4, 2026, the Applicant states since claim 26 was objected to in the Nonfinal Office Action dated November 5, 2025, then current independent claims 3, 11, 19, and 26 are in condition for allowance. However, Examiner would like to direct the Applicant’s attention to the fact that claim 26 was rejected in said Non-final Office Action. See page 5 of said Non-final Office Action. Also, claims 3, 11, and 19 that include the same limitation were rejected in said Non-final Office Action. As a result, it is obvious that claim 26 was mistakenly objected to under Allowable Subject Matter by Examiner. Examiner further submits that Wang teaches all the limitations of claims 3, 11, 19, and 26. See the rejection below. For these reasons, the rejection is maintained, and this Office Action is made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 3, 11, 19, and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (hereinafter referred to as “Wang”, EP 3 850 772 B1). As to claims 3 and 11, Wang further teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: a plurality of antennas (paragraph [0061]); a processing system that includes one or more processors and one or more memories coupled with the one or more processors (paragraphs [0118]-[0120]), the processing system configured to cause the UE to: wirelessly transmit, to a network node via a plurality of antennas, one or more channel-related parameters associated with a wireless channel between the UE and the network node (Fig. 14, step 1415, paragraphs [0068] and [0164]), wherein the one or more channel-related parameters comprise a noise power associated with a receive antenna of the UE, a signal to noise ratio (SNR) across one or more resource elements (REs) of the wireless channel, a mutual information value associated with transmission and reception via the wireless channel, or a combination thereof (paragraphs [0010] and [0068]); wirelessly receive, from the network node via the plurality of antennas plurality of antennas, one or more network parameters (Fig. 14, step 1420, paragraph [0165]); select a modulation order in accordance with the one or more channel-related parameters and the one or more network parameters (Fig. 14, steps 1420 and 1425, paragraphs [0073] and [0166]); wirelessly receive, from the network node via the plurality of antennas and in accordance with the transmission of the one or more channel-related parameters, a modulated bitstream (Fig. 15, step 1520, paragraphs [0065] and [0171]); and demodulate the modulated bitstream in accordance with the modulation order to generate a demodulated bitset (Fig. 8, transceiver 820, paragraphs [0012], [0043], and [0116]). As to claims 19 and 26, Wang teaches an apparatus and a method of wireless communication by a network node, comprising: a plurality of antennas (paragraphs [0023] and [0061]); and a processing system that includes one or more processors and one or more memories coupled with the one or more processors (paragraphs [0118]-[0120]), the processing system configured to cause the UE to: wirelessly transmit, to a user equipment (UE) via the plurality of antennas, an indicator associated with a channel aware modulation mode (Fig. 14, step 1405, since spectral efficiency is a channel aware metric, step 1415); wirelessly receive, from the UE via the plurality of antennas and in accordance with the transmission of the indicator, one or more channel-related parameters associated with a wireless channel between the UE and the network node (Fig. 14, step 1415, paragraphs [0068] and [0164]), wherein the one or more channel-related parameters comprise a noise power associated with a receive antenna of the UE, a signal to noise ratio (SNR) across one or more resource elements (REs) of the wireless channel, a mutual information value associated with transmission and reception via the wireless channel, or a combination thereof (paragraphs [0010] and [0068]); wirelessly transmit, to the UE via the plurality of antennas, one or more network parameters (Fig. 14, step 1420, paragraph [0165]); select a modulation order in accordance with the one or more channel-related parameters and the one or more network parameters (Fig. 14, steps 1420 and 1425, paragraphs [0073] and [0166]); modulate a bitset in accordance with the modulation order to generate a modulated bitstream (Fig. 15, step 1520, paragraphs [0065] and [0171]); and wirelessly transmit, to the UE via the plurality of antennas, the modulated bitstream (Fig. 15, step 1520, paragraphs [0065] and [0171]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4-9, 12-17, 20-24, and 27-30 are allowed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRESHTEH N AGHDAM whose telephone number is (571)272-6037. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10:30-7:00 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh M Fan can be reached at 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRESHTEH N AGHDAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632 2/9/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587426
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION BASED ON TRANSFORMED SIGNAL CONSTELLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580793
JOINT TIMING OFFSET, FREQUENCY OFFSET, AND CHANNEL ESTIMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580584
DELTA SIGMA MODULATION CIRCUIT, DIGITAL TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT, AND DIGITAL TRANSMITTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568004
FEED FORWARD EQUALIZERS WITH CURRENT MODE SAMPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568007
EQUALIZATION METHOD, EQUALIZATION DEVICE AND RECEIVING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month