Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/625,380

LIGHT EMITTING DIODE LIGHTING STRUCTURE WITH INTEGRATED NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION BASED CONTROLS AND MULTI-CHANNEL ELECTRONICS DRIVER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 03, 2024
Examiner
CHAI, RAYMOND REI-YANG
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ledvance LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
413 granted / 546 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 546 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the applicant's amendment submitted on 09/25/2025 In virtue of this amendment: Claims 21-25 canceled; Claims 1, 8 and 16 are currently amended; and thus, Claims 1-20 are pending; Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/25/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections The objection to claim 21 is moot in view of cancellation of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US2023/0031367A1 hereinafter “Li” in view of US2020/0253015A1 hereinafter “Huang” Regarding claim 1, Li discloses a lighting structure comprising: a housing having a light emission surface (¶32L2: a light engine housing); a light engine (¶37L2-3: the light engine, e.g., light emitting diode (LED) light engine) within the housing (¶337L2-3: a housing for containing the light engine) including at least two lighting schemes comprised of light emitting diodes for emitting light through the light emission surface (¶32L5-8: two lighting schemes in which a separate current can be set and adjusted to be sent to each of the two lighting scheme); a multi-channel electronics driver (¶38L2-3: driver electronics) in electrical communication with the light engine (¶38L5-7: electrical connection between the driver electronics and the light engine), the multi-channel electronics driver including a current circuit (¶48L7-9: the mixing integrated circuit (IC) can distribute current to each of the lighting scheme) for controlling a mixture of current of the at least two lighting schemes to provide light emission from the light engine (¶48L7-9: distribute current to each of the lighting scheme to mix the light being emitted by the lighting scheme)of a selected color correlated temperature (CCT) (¶54L1-15: IC of the driver electronics can distribute current to each of the lighting scheme to mix the light, e.g., color of light); a near field communication (NFC) circuit (¶33L2-3: an integrated near field communication (NFC) transceiver) having a near field communication (NFC) receiver for receiving instructions for setting the selected color correlated temperature (¶33L3-5: transceiver for receiving commands for selecting lighting characteristics emitted by the lamp) and memory for storing read instructions for the selected color correlated temperature (¶89L7-12: NFC circuit includes memory having instructions stored thereon to interpret command signal received to select characteristics for the light that the user has selected), wherein the near field communication circuit is in communication with the multi-channel electronics driver to provide the instruction for the selected color correlated temperature (CCT) to the current circuit for controlling the current (¶92L1-13: the mixing integrated circuit distributes portions of the current to each of the lighting arrangements)of the at least two lighting schemes (¶89L15-22: NFC control signal includes PWM signals to the mixing integrated circuit; the mixing IC receiving the control signal sets a separate current to each of the two lighting scheme to control light characteristic for light being emitted by the light engine), wherein the near field communication (NFC) circuit includes an auxiliary power supply (¶89L6-7: an auxiliary power module for the NFC module) that is independent from a primary power supply to the multi-channel electronics driver (as shown in Fig.8 and Fig.9). Li discloses distributing current for mixing the color scheme (¶54L1-15) however, does not expclitly disclose that the current distribution is based on a “current ratio” of the at least two lighting scheme. Huang discloses a lighting structure comprising: a current ratio circuit (¶44L4-6: the MCU control the ratio of the current) for controlling a mixture ratio of the at least two lighting schemes to provide light emission from the light engine (¶44L1-6: the total drive current ITOTAL output by the power supply is split into two currents: flowing through the first LED string and flowing through the second LED string)of a selected color correlated temperature (CCT) (¶44L4-6: the MCU controls the ratio of the current to control the output CCT of the luminaire) It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art prior to the effective filing date of the application to replace the mixing integrated IC circuit disclosed by Li with the ratio control circuit disclosed by Huang. One of ordinary skill in the art would’ve been motivated because this allows both CCT and maximum luminosity to be filed-configurable and user may be able to further adjust the CCT and/or maximum luminosity as required for desired. (Huang ¶54L1-11) Regarding claim 2, Li in view of Huang hereinafter “Li/Huang” discloses in Li the lighting structure of claim 1, wherein the at least two lighting schemes comprises a first light emitting diode string having a first color correlated temperature (¶52L1-8: LED string may include LED that emit blue light) and a second light emitting diode string having a second color correlated temperature. (¶52L1-8: the second string of LED may include LED that emit red light) Regarding claim 3, Li/Huang discloses the light structure of claim 2, wherein the controlling of the mixture ratio of the at least two lighting schemes to provide light emission from the light engine of the selected color correlated temperature (CCT) comprises adjusting current to each of the first and second light emitting diode strings to achieve a combined color correlated temperature that is a mixture of the first and second color correlated temperatures. (Li ¶54L1-15: driver can distribute current to each of the lighting scheme to mix the light, E.g., color of light, being emitting by the light scheme; by mixing the light produced by the separate lighting scheme the color light characteristic of the light engine may be a mixture of the color light characteristic of the individual lighting scheme; Huang ¶28L1-8: a current ratio control circuit determines a ratio of current; by controlling the ratio of currents, a desired overall, blended CCT of the luminaire may be selected across a broad spectrum of CCT values) Regarding claim 4, Li/Huang discloses in Huang the light structure of claim 3, wherein the adjusting of the current to each of the first and second light emitting diode strings to achieve the combined color correlated temperature comprises: receiving at the multi-channel electronics driver a full current value from a power integrated circuit (¶44L1-6: the total drive current ITOTAL output by the power supply is split into two currents: flowing through the first LED string and flowing through the second LED string); distributing a first portion of the current to a first lighting scheme of the light engine (¶44L1-6: I1 flowing through the first LED string); and distributing a second portion of the current to at least a second lighting scheme of the light engine. (¶44L1-6: I2 flowing through the second LED string) Regarding claim 5, Li/Huang discloses in Li the discloses the light structure of claim 1, the housing has the geometry of a bulb that meets an ANSI bulb standard selected from the group consisting of A-type, B-type, BR-type, E-type, PAR-type, MR-type, T-type, ST-type and combinations thereof. (¶35L1-12: examples of standards for tube lighting include UL Type A T8 lamp, UL Type B T8 lamp, and T12 magnetic and electronic ballast lamps.) Regarding claim 6, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 1, the housing has the geometry of a tube having a standard selected from the group consisting of T2, T4, T5, T6, T8, T9, T10, T12, T17 and combinations thereof. (¶35L1-12: examples of standards for tube lighting include UL Type A T8 lamp, UL Type B T8 lamp, and T12 magnetic and electronic ballast lamps.) Regarding claim 7, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 1, the housing has the geometry of a recessed downlight (¶33L1-2: a downlight geometry luminaire), the recessed downlight having a diameter selected from the group consisting of 3 inch, 4 inch, 5 inch, 6 inch, 8 inch, 9 inch, 10 inch, and 12 inch. (¶101L18-24: light engine hosing having a diameter of 5 inches or less) Regarding claim 8, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 1 further comprising a DC-DC power circuit for powering the NFC circuit. (¶100L1-11: the auxiliary power module be provide a DC-DC power circuit for powering the NFC circuit) Regarding claim 9, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 1, an exterior of the housing does not include any switches for selecting light characteristics to be emitted by the light engine. (as shown in Fig.1, there are no physical switches on either housing) Regarding claim 10, Li/Huang discloses in Huang the light structure of claim 1, wherein the multi-channel electronics driver has two channels. (¶44L1-6: the total drive current ITOTAL output by the power supply is split into two currents: flowing through the first LED string and flowing through the second LED string) Regarding claim 11, Li/Huang discloses the light structure of claim 1, Li/Huang does not expclitly disclose: the multi-channel electronics driver is housed within the housing. It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art prior to the effective filing date of the application to incorporate the IC/MCU into the housing of the luminaire. One of ordinary skill in the art would’ve been motivated because this allows the entire luminaire to be in a single package and it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Regarding claim 12, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 1, the multi-channel electronics driver is exterior to the housing of the light structure. (¶54L1-15: the mixing integrated circuit of the driver electronics within the second housing) Regarding claim 13, Li/Huang discloses the light structure of claim 4, Li/Huang does not expclitly disclose: the first color correlated temperature is 3000K, and the second color correlated temperature is 5000K. Huang does disclose that when all the current is going to the first channel LED strings the luminaire has the CCT of the first LED string which may be cool white (¶36L6-7) and when all the current is going to the second channel LED string the luminaire has the CCT of the second LED string which is a warm color e.g. orange or red. (¶36L12-14). Thus the CCT of the first LED string would be in the range of cool white, which is understood to be typically between 4600K to 6500K and the CCT of the second string would be in warm color, which is understood to be typically 2700K-3000K. Regarding claim 14, Li/Huang discloses the light structure of claim 4, Li/Huang does not expclitly disclose: the first color correlated temperature is 2700K, and the second color correlated temperature is 5000K. Huang does disclose that when all the current is going to the first channel LED strings the luminaire has the CCT of the first LED string which may be cool white (¶36L6-7) and when all the current is going to the second channel LED string the luminaire has the CCT of the second LED string which is a warm color e.g. orange or red. (¶36L12-14). Thus the CCT of the first LED string would be in the range of cool white, which is understood to be typically between 4600K to 6500K and the CCT of the second string would be in warm color, which is understood to be typically 2700K-3000K. Regarding claim 15, Li/Huang discloses in Li the light structure of claim 4, the combined color correlated temperature ranges from 2700K to 6500K. (¶57L1-12: a color correlated temperature of total light provided by the totality of lighting schemes that is equal to 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, 5000K or 6500K) Regarding claim 16, the claim recites the same limitations (except as a method claim) as in claim 1 and thus rejected under the same rejection as presented above in claim 1. Regarding claim 17, the claim recites the same limitations (except as a method claim) as in claim 1 and thus rejected under the same rejection as presented above in claim 2. Regarding claim 18, the claim recites the same limitations (except as a method claim) as in claim 1 and thus rejected under the same rejection as presented above in claim 3. Regarding claim 19, Li/Huang discloses in Huang the discloses the method of claim 18, wherein the modulating of the percentage of current to the different lighting schemes of the at least two lighting schemes provides for different light settings of light being emitted from the light engine, the light settings for the light characteristic extend from a minimum value to a maximum value through a functionally continuous range. (¶46L1-20: independently controlling the duty cycles of PWM control signal, the MCU establish any desired ratio of current with either of the LED string receiving from 0% to 100% of the total drive current) Regarding claim 20, Li/Huang discloses in Li the method of claim 19, wherein the combined color correlated temperature ranges from 2700K to 6500K. (¶57L1-12: a color correlated temperature of total light provided by the totality of lighting schemes that is equal to 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, 5000K or 6500K) Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND R CHAI whose telephone number is (571)270-0576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander H Taningco can be reached at (571)272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Raymond R Chai/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 03, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593385
CONTROL METHODS AND CONTROLLERS FOR COORDINATED LIGHTING EFFECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593389
A METHOD OF MERGING TWO LIGHTING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588122
A LIGHTING CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578066
Adaptive Flashlight Control Module
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562463
HIGH-FREQUENCY RADIATION UNIT AND MULTI-FREQUENCY BASE STATION ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.9%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 546 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month