Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/625,915

METHOD, USER EQUIPMENT, AND BASE STATION FOR BEAM INDICATION IN AN MTRP OPERATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 03, 2024
Priority
Apr 06, 2023 — provisional 63/457,436
Examiner
PHAM, BRENDA H
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1071 granted / 1180 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1199
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remark, filed 02 June 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) under 35 USC 112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. Further the rejection under 35 USC 102 and 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of (EP 3651397). The indicated allowability of claims 3, 10 and 17 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to(EP 3651397). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. The Amendments filed on 02 June 2026 introduced significant amendments to claims 1-4, 8-11 and 15-18, respectively. Because Applicant’s amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Therefore, finality in the situation is proper. Claims 1-20 are pending. Figures 1 and 2 of the application illustrate the claimed invention. PNG media_image1.png 740 564 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 8, 10, 15 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of (EP 3651397). Regarding claims 1, 8 and 15, (WO 2020/141484 A1) discloses a method performed by a user equipment (UE) for beam indication in a multiple transmission and reception point (mTRP) operation, the method comprising: receiving, from a base station (BS), a radio resource control (RRC) configuration for configuring a set of transmission configuration indication (TCI) states (“To introduce dynamics in beam and TRP selection, the UE can be configured through RRC signaling with N transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) states, where N is up to 128 in frequency range 2 (FR2) and up to eight in FR1, depending on UE capability.” See page 21.; receiving, from the BS, a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) that activates one or more TCI states from the set of TCI states (“a MAC CE TCI state activation message comprises an indication of the number of repetitions associated with a codepoint of the TCI field in DCI, in addition to which TCI state candidates are mapped to which codepoint of the TCI field.” See page 30), (“The UE can be configured by gNB (e.g., by MAC CE activation) to actively track multiple TCI states.” see page 37, (“Various exemplary embodiments can assign a TCI state to each PDSCH in various ways. In some embodiments, the TCI state for each PDSCH can be configured by RRC or MAC control element (CE), e.g., by letting a MAC CE indicate a set of multiple active TCI states. For example, a MAC CE can indicate a set of two, four or eight active TCI state that are selected by MAC CE in NR Rel-15 can also be used for PDSCH repetition in a cyclic manner. For example, each PDSCH use one of the activated TCI states in a predefined order.” See page 29.; receiving, from the BS, a downlink control information (DCI) format that includes a TCI selection field indicating a relationship between the activated one or more TCI states and one or more TRPs (Alternatively, in order to give the network scheduler more flexibility in selecting multiple sources (e.g., TRPs) to be used in the PDSCH repetitions, the selected active TCI state can be indicated in the scheduling DCI for the PDSCH repetitions. In other words, the DCI can select among the activated TCI states when scheduling the PDSCH with repetition. Table 6 below shows an exemplary arrangement where the set of active states for PDSCH repetitions (e.g., TCI states (1-3) can be configured by RRC or MAC CE, but the assignment of individual active TCI states to individual PDSCH repetitions is provided by DCI on PDCCH. In this example, a two-bit DCI field selects a table row that has a specific assignment of the four active TCI states to four PDSCH repetitions transmitted by four different sources (e.g., TRPs or beams). In other words, the content of Table 6 (in italics) can be configured by RRC and/or MAC, then a two-bit DIC field (as used in this example) selects a row in the table.” See page 29); and performing, based on the TCI selection field, a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) reception. See figure 9. PNG media_image2.png 490 796 media_image2.png Greyscale (WO 2020/141484 A1) fails to explicitly teach wherein the TCI selection field includes a first codepoint, a second codepoint or a third codepoint, the first codepoint indicates that a first activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states corresponds to a first TRP, the second codepoint indicates that a second activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states corresponds to a second TRP, and the third codepoint indicates that the first activated TCI state and the second a activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states correspond, respectively, to the first TRP and the second TRP. ([0080]: “For instance, the multi-TRP state may be a combination of respective TCI states for a plurality of TRPs such as TRP2 and TRP3”). (EP 3651397 A1) in the same field of invention, teaches these features. See tables 2 and 3. the first codepoint indicates that a first activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states corresponds to a first TRP, the second codepoint indicates that a second activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states corresponds to a second TRP. PNG media_image3.png 493 548 media_image3.png Greyscale the third codepoint indicates that the first activated TCI state and the second a activated TCI state of the activated one or more TCI states correspond, respectively, to the first TRP and the second TRP. ([0080]: “For instance, the multi-TRP state may be a combination of respective TCI states for a plurality of TRPs such as TRP2 and TRP3”). See table 3. PNG media_image4.png 462 589 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement the TCI state index (the TCI transmission parameter included in the DCI) contain information about a TRP and/or for instance, a TCI index corresponding to the TCI state transmission may be configured to indicate the TCI-state information for more than one TRPs. Regarding claims 3, 10 and 17, (EP 3651397) teaches the first activated TCI state has a lowest index among indices of the activated one or more TCI states, and the second activated TCI state has a second lowest index among the indices of the activated one or more TCI state. Table 2 shows, for example, the first activated TCI state 1 has a lowest index, for example, “0” and the second activated TCI state “State 2” has the second lowest index of 1. PNG media_image3.png 493 548 media_image3.png Greyscale In 5G NR, the Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) is a set of pre-defined beam configuration (TCI states) that tell the UE which beam(s) to use for receiving (e.g., PDSCH) or transmitting (e.g., PUSCH) certain channels. Each TCI state is identified by a TCI state index. Therefore, it would have been obvious to those having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the TCI states as in the claims 3, 10 and 17, such that the first activated TCI state has a lowest index among indices of the activated one or more TCI states, and the second activated TCI state has a second lowest index among the indices of the activated one or more TCI state. Claim(s) 2, 9 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of (EP 3651397), further in view of AHN et al. (US 2009/0197630 A1). Regarding claims 2, 9 and 16, (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of (EP 3651397) fails to teach wherein the DCI format does not further include a TCI field indicating one or more TCI states from the activated one or more TCI state. AHN et al. in the same field of invention, teaches this feature. AHN et al. teach the DCI format in table 1 does not further include a TCI field indicating one or more TCI state from the activated one or more TCI states. PNG media_image5.png 403 608 media_image5.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a DCI format, such as shown in table 1 that the DCI does not include a TCI field indicating one or more TCI states from the activated one or more TCI state. Claim(s) 5-7, 12-14 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of (EP 3651397) and further in view of Farag et al. (US 2021/0359745 A1). Regarding claims 5, 12 and 19, (WO 2020/141484 A1) fails to explicitly teach wherein each TCI state of the set of TCI states comprises a joint TCI state. Farag et al. in the same field of invention, teaches this feature. Farag et al. teaches ([0433]: “A gNB/TRP determines the TCI state of a downlink and/or uplink transmission and signals the TCI state to the UE in a DCI, where the TCI state can be a common (joint) TCI state (for DL and UL) or a DL TCI state, or an UL TCI state; alternatively, the TCI state can be signaled through MAC CE signaling.”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to those having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Farag et al. with (WO 2020/141484 A1) for configure joint TCI state. Regarding claims 6 and 13, Farag et al. teaches wherein each TCI state of the set of TCI states comprises a downlink (DL) TCI state. See [0433]. Regarding claims 7, 14 and 20, Farag et al. further teaches wherein the DCI format comprises a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2. ([0120]: “The gNB/NW can then indicate the DL RX beam selection (step 904) using the DL-TCI field or joint TCI field in the DL-related DCI (that carries the DL grant, such as DCI format 1_1 in NR), ([045]: “In one example, a channel conveying a beam indication (e.g. a TCI state or a spatial relation indication) reuses a DCI format for scheduling PDSCH (e.g., DCI Format 1_0, or DCI Format 1_1 or DCI Format 1_2 and/or a DCI format for scheduling PUSCH (e.g., DCI Format 0_0, or DCI Format 0_1, or DCI Format 0_2), where the corresponding DCI Format does not include a DL assignment or an UL grant.). Claim(s) 4, 11 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of (EP 3651397) and further in view of SUN et al. (US 2020/0045700 A1). Regarding claims 4, 11 and 18, (WO 2020/141484 A1) teaches fails to explicitly teach wherein the DCI format further includes a TCI field indicating one or more TCI states from the activated one or more TCI states. SUN et al. in the same field of invention, teaches ([0119]: “the multi-TRP mode is a single physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) and single physical downlink shared channel( PDSCH) mode, wherein downlink control information (DCI) transmitted to the UE based at least in part on configuring the UE to operate in the multi-TRP mode includes: associated with the multi-TRP mode, wherein an element in a list of TCI states in a radio resource control (RRC) configuration is associated with a single TRP, or a single TCI field in the DCI to indicate PDSCH quasi-co-locations (QCLs) for the multiple TRPs, wherein the element in the list of TCI state in the RRC configuration is an indicator for the multiple TRPs, wherein a DCI format of the DCI or a size of the DCI is based at least in part on the DCI including the separate TCI fields or the single TCI field.” It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine SUN et al. with (WO 2020/141484 A1) for configuring a user equipment to operate in a transmission/reception point (TRP) mode. Claims 2, 9 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2020/141484 A1) in view of BAI et al. (US 2024/0154776 A1), referred to Provisional application No. 63/422,342, filed on Nov. 3, 2022, provisional application No. 63/447,844, field on Feb. 23, 2023. Regarding claims 2, 9 and 16, BAI et al. further teaches wherein the DCI format does not further include a TCI field indicating one or more TCI states from the activated one or more TCI states. ([0094]: “a PDSCH scheduled by a DCI without the dynamic TCI selection field 660 may follow separate or additional default rules. The default rules for PDSCH may apply when the PDSCH scheduling offset is greater than a time duration for QCL. In a first example, for DCI format 1_1 or 1_2 without dynamic TCI selection field 660, all indicated TCI states may be applied to the scheduled PDSCH. It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure DCI format without TCI field. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant disclosure: TSAI et al. (US 2020/0107352 A2) teaches “The UE receives configuration information of multiple transmission configuration indication (TCI) states. The UE receives one or more activation commands that associate a first subset of the TCI states with one or more codepoints of a TCI field and a second subset of the TCI states with the one or more codepoints of the TCI field. PNG media_image6.png 444 864 media_image6.png Greyscale WO 2022/093098 A1) teaches “a set of codepoints for a DCI field used for TCI state selection comprises a number (M) of codepoints that are reserved for implicitly activated TCI states and a number (N) of codepoint that are reserved for explicitly updated TCI state.” He et al. (US 2024/0040409 A1) discloses techniques for dynamically mapping unified transmission states for multipoint control channel reception includes the TCI selection field may indicate an index of a TCI state within the set of active DL or point TCI states, e.g., indicating that the TC state with that index should be selected for the pool corresponding to the TCI selection field. PNG media_image7.png 746 588 media_image7.png Greyscale Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRENDA H PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-3135. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-3135. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Jiang can be reached at 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRENDA H. PHAM Primary Examiner Art Unit 2412 /BRENDA H PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684450
EXTENDING LOCAL CELLULAR WAN CAPABILITIES TO A CONNECTED DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683730
COOPERATIVE TRANSMISSION METHOD BASED ON ADAPTIVE TERMINAL AGGREGATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677290
PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL DETECTION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677311
METHODS OF MULTIPLEXING A HIGH PRIORITY SR ON A LOW PRIORITY PUSCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671460
CONFIGURABLE TRANSMIT-RECEIVE SWITCH FOR A TRANSCEIVER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month