Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/626,340

INTEGRATED STRUCTURE OF STEEL FRAME ASSEMBLY AND STEEL SUPPORT FOR SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER STATION AND ASSEMBLING METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Priority
Oct 19, 2023 — CN 202311356010.4 +1 more
Examiner
MAESTRI, PATRICK J
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Anhui Caesar New Energy Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
780 granted / 1065 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1092
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-4 in the reply filed on February 25, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1: The use of roman numerals “I” and “II” in multiple instances to refer to different elements makes the claim indefinite because it is unclear if that numbering refers to an alternate of each of the elements or if they are numbers for each part or element being claimed. It is unclear what “are of the same structures” means when referring to connecting portions. Does this refer to a same size, same shape, etc? It is unclear what “are connected with the purlines again” refers to. How are they connected again? It is unclear what “all steel sides II” refers to when referring to steel frames. Does it mean all the walls or sides of the steel frames are steel? It is unclear what “a back locking or pressing block fixation manner” means. It is unclear what “a laminating piece” refers to. It is unclear what “at an L-shaped mounting” refers to. How is the laminating piece arranged at? Claim 1 recites the limitation "the lowermost positions" in line 8, “the steel frames II” in line 19. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear what an angle code is. It is unclear what a “back locking pr pressing block fixation manner” refers to. Regarding claim 2: It is unclear what it means “adopting a chamfer structure design” as well as a “circular arc design”. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the folding edge I" in lines 5-6 and “the folding edge II” in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 3: It is unclear what “in regarding” means in the claim. It is unclear what “mutual fit and fixed connection” means. It is unclear how a hole is D-shaped. It is unclear what the overall claim is trying to accomplish. Regarding claim 4: It is unclear what it means “just embedded”. It is unclear if “guide folding edges II” are the same as “the folding edge II” in claim 2. It is unclear what the overall claim is trying to accomplish. Patentability in relation to Prior Art will be determined once the scope of the claims is better clarified. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK J MAESTRI whose telephone number is (571)270-7859. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at 571-270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK J MAESTRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637864
PLATE FOR ROOFING APPLICATIONS WHERE A ROOF MEMBRANE HAS BEEN CUT OPEN FOR INSPECTION OR INSULATION REPLACEMENT AND MUST BE STITCHED BACK TOGETHER, AND A METHOD OF USING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631020
FRAMING GASKET
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618246
EXTERIOR TRIM SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618237
CEILING FAÇADE SYSTEM
1y 12m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613045
ROOF RIDGE VENT
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month