Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/626,583

SURFACE-MOUNTED MAGNETIC-COMPONENT MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1001 granted / 1226 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1276
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1226 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species of Figure 24 in the reply filed on 4/24/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that claims 1-15 read on Figure 24 and claims 1, 6, 11 are generic. This is not found persuasive because claims 4-5, 9-10 and 14-15 do not read on Figure 24. Claims 1-3, 6-8 and 11-13 will be examined herewith. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 11-13, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou et al. [US 6,998,952 B2] in view of Feng et al. [US 2009/0160595 A1]. Regarding claim 1, Zhou et al. discloses a magnetic-component module [figure 5] comprising: - a substrate [502] including wiring portions [505, 506, 507, 522]; - a core [521] on a first surface of the substrate; - a gap between the core and the substrate [figure 2]; - a spacer [519] that conforms to a top of the core; and - a winding including: wire bonds [511, figure 5] extending over the core and electrically connecting a first portion of the substrate at the wiring portion [505] and a second portion of the substrate at the wiring portion [figure 5] of the substrate. Zhou et al. discloses the instant claimed invention except for an overmold material encapsulating the core, the spacer, the gap, the wire bonds, and a portion of the substrate. Feng et al. discloses a magnetic component [figure 1A] comprising: - a substrate [11] having wiring portions [13]; - a core [15] on surface of the substrate; - wire bonds [19c, 19c] formed over the core; and - an overmold material [101] formed/encapsulated the core, the wire bonds and portions of the substrate [figure 1A]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include an overmold material in Zhou et al., as suggested by Feng et al., for the purpose protecting and encasing the magnetic component [abstract]. The overmold material would extend into the gap between the core and the substrate ff Zhou et al. Regarding claims 2-3, Zhou et al. discloses a material [503, 504] in the gap between the core and the substrate, wherein material to mount the core to the substrate [figure 5]. Zhou et al., in other embodiment of figure 2, discloses the use of epoxy [142] between the core [102] and the substrate. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use adhesive material for the material of Zhou et al., figure 5, for the purpose of providing adhesion between the core and the substrate. The adhesive is in the gap and the overmold would encapsulate the adhesive. Regarding claim 11, Zhou et al. discloses magnetic-component module [figure 5] comprising: - a substrate [502] including wiring portions [505, 506, 507, 522]; - a core [521] on a first surface of the substrate; - a gap between the core and the substrate [figure 2]; - a spacer [519] extending over an entire outer surface of the core or over substantially the entire outer surface of the core [figure 5]; and - a winding including: wire bonds [511, figure 5] extending over the core and electrically connecting a first portion of the substrate at wiring portion [505, 506, 507, figure 5] and a second portion of the substrate at wiring portion [507, 522, figure 5]. Zhou et al. discloses the instant claimed invention except for an overmold material encapsulating the core, the spacer, the gap, the wire bonds, and a portion of the substrate. Feng et al. discloses a magnetic component [figure 1A] comprising: - a substrate [11] having wiring portions [13]; - a core [15] on surface of the substrate; - wire bonds [19c, 19c] formed over the core; and - an overmold material [101] formed/encapsulated the core, the wire bonds and portions of the substrate [figure 1A]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include an overmold material in Zhou et al., as suggested by Feng et al., for the purpose protecting and encasing the magnetic component [abstract]. The overmold material would extend into the gap between the core and the substrate of Zhou et al. Regarding claims 12-13, Zhou et al. discloses a material [503, 504] in the gap between the core and the substrate, wherein material to mount the core to the substrate [figure 5]. Zhou et al., in other embodiment of figure 2, discloses the use of epoxy [142] between the core [102] and the substrate. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use adhesive material for the material of Zhou et al., figure 5, for the purpose of providing adhesion between the core and the substrate. The adhesive is in the gap and the overmold would encapsulate the adhesive. Claim(s) 6-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Evans et al. [US 5,543,773] in view of Feng et al. [US 2009/0160595 A1]. Regarding claim 6, Evans et al. discloses a magnetic-component module [figures 11-15b and 22] comprising: - a substrate [121] including wiring portions [122, P, figure 22]; - a core [130] on a first surface of the substrate; - a gap between the core and the substrate [figure 22]; and - a winding including: wire bonds [126] extending over the core and electrically connecting a first portion of the substrate and a second portion of the substrate; and the wiring portions of the substrate [figure 22]. Evans et al., further discloses a spacer [former/spacer in figure 13] on the core such that an edge of the spacer overhangs the core; Evans et al. discloses the instant claimed invention except for an overmold material encapsulating the core, the spacer, the gap, the wire bonds, and a portion of the substrate. Feng et al. discloses a magnetic component [figure 1A] comprising: - a substrate [11] having wiring portions [13]; - a core [15] on surface of the substrate; - wire bonds [19c, 19c] formed over the core; and - an overmold material [101] formed/encapsulated the core, the wire bonds and portions of the substrate [figure 1A]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include an overmold material in Evans et al., as suggested by Feng et al., for the purpose protecting and encasing the magnetic component [abstract]. The overmold material would extend into the gap between the core and the substrate of Evans et al. Regarding claims 7-8, Evans et al. further discloses the core may be adhesively attached [e.g. with thermally conductive adhesive] to the substrate [column 9, lines 16-19]. The adhesive is in the gap and the overmold would encapsulate the adhesive. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 6-8 and 11-13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
May 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 21, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603221
IMPROVED LOW-EMI TRANSFORMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597552
Magnetic Device and the Method to Make the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592633
POWER CONVERSION MODULE AND MAGNETIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592335
LAMINATED COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586708
INNOVATIVE PLANAR ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPONENT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+0.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1226 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month