Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/626,604

LIGHT EMITTING APPARATUS, IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGING APPARATUS, ELECTRIC UNIT, AND IMAGING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, NHAN T
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
699 granted / 808 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
825
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 808 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of species II (Figs. 17A to Fig. 27) in the reply filed on 11/21/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s): “Neither Applicant nor the Patent and Trademark Office should be put through the trouble and expense entailed in multiple filing and prosecution. Further, the making of an election-of-species requirement is not mandatory in all instances. It is submitted that it would not be an undue burden on the Examiner to examine all of the pending claims in the present application. Accordingly, in the interests of prosecution and economy of time, for Applicant, the Office, and the public-at-large, reconsideration and withdrawal of the election-of-species requirement is respectfully requested.” (Applicant’s remarks, page 2). This is found persuasive, and therefore the election of species is withdrawn. Claims 1-35 are examined on the merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/04/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoshida (US 2020/0077025 A1). Regarding claim 20, Yoshida discloses an electric unit (an optical driving unit shown in Figs. 3A to 5) comprising: an inductor (21) including a conductor wiring (copper wire) wound about a straight winding axis and having a first face (the side that faces toward element 27 in Fig. 3A, 3B and 5) and a second face (the other face) that intersect the winding axis (Figs. 3A, 3B, 4 & 5 and par. [0046]); and a nonmagnetic conductive member (27) arranged on the first face side with respect to the inductor (Figs. 3A, 3B, 4 & 5 and par. [0045]), wherein the electric unit satisfies that: and/or (please note that the alternative limitations are not necessarily considered in this Office Action) (ii) in a cross section including the winding axis, the conductive member is curved or bent protruding to the opposite side of the inductor so as to cover the inductor (see Fig. 4, wherein the nonmagnetic conductive member 27 is bent to the opposite side of the inductor 21 to cover the inductor). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 and 21-35 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1, the prior art references of record, either alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest: “A light emitting apparatus comprising: a light emitting component; an inductor electrically connected to the light emitting component; and a conductive member, wherein the inductor includes a conductor wiring wound about a straight winding axis and has a first face and a second face that intersect the winding axis, wherein the conductive member is nonmagnetic and is arranged on the first face side with respect to the inductor, and wherein the light emitting apparatus satisfies that: (i) in a cross section including the winding axis, a first distance between an intersection of the winding axis with the conductive member and an intersection of the winding axis with the first face is longer than a second distance between an intersection of a line extending parallel to the winding axis at each of both ends of the inductor in the first face with the conductive member and each of both the ends of the inductor, and/or (ii) in a cross section including the winding axis, the conductive member is curved or bent protruding to the opposite side of the inductor so as to cover the inductor.” Regarding claims 2-19, these claims are either dependent from claim 1 or incorporate all limitations from claim 1. Regarding claim 21, the prior art references of record, either alone or in combination, fail to teach or suggest: “A light emitting apparatus comprising: a light emitting component; an inductor electrically connected to the light emitting component; a conductive member; and a magnetic member, wherein the conductive member is arranged on at least one end side in a direction of a winding axis of the inductor so as to intersect the winding axis, and wherein the magnetic member is arranged on a side face side of the inductor.” The closest teaching of record is from Miyajima (JP 2011035339 A) who teaches a light-emitting circuit for a stroboscopic device, which can reduce an influence of magnetic force, generated from an inductor (coil 7), on the inside and the outside by reducing a range of a magnetic field around the inductor without making a structure complex. In the light-emitting circuit for the stroboscopic device which includes a capacitor (6) for supplying electric power to a flash discharge tube and the inductor provided on a cable run connecting the capacitor and flash discharge tube (light emitting element 2) to each other, and in which the inductor is composed of a coil formed by spirally winding a conductor, the inductor includes: at least one first coil part formed by spirally winding a conductor; and at least one second coil part electrically connected to the first coil part in series and formed by spirally winding a conductor concentrically or substantially concentrically with the first coil part. The first coil part has the winding direction of the conductor set so that a current may flow around the center in one direction, and the second coil part has the winding direction of the conductor set so that a current may flow around the center in the opposite direction from the one direction (see Figs. 3-5). However, Miyajima fails to teach or suggest the light emitting apparatus comprising a magnetic member, wherein the magnetic member is arranged on a side face side of the inductor. This lack of teaching of the feature would not and cannot be compensated by the teaching of Yoshida (US 2020/0077025 A1) because Yoshida teaches a non-magnetic member (27) for shielding the magnetic noise from the inductor. On contrary, the current claimed invention requires “a magnetic member” which is arranged on a side face side of the inductor. Although Yoshida discloses a magnetic member (23 in Figs. 4 & 5), this magnetic member (23) functions as a driving motor to drive a correction lens for image stabilization, not for shielding magnetic noise. If Miyajima and Yoshida would be combinable, the combination would defeat the purposes of all inventions from both sides. Therefore, the claimed subject matter is not taught nor suggested by either an individual reference or combination of references. Regarding claims 22-35, these claims are either dependent from claim 21 or incorporate all limitations from claim 21. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NHAN T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7371. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NHAN T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604119
ADAPTIVE GAIN FOR IMAGE SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598401
SOLID IMAGING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SOLID IMAGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581218
SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581189
A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A CAMERA MONITORING A SCENE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568192
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 808 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month