Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/626,840

POWER AMPLIFIER CONTROL DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0115736
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHANH V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1119 granted / 1197 resolved
+33.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1197 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 10-12, 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by AN et al. (20220173762), hereafter called AN. Regarding claims 1, 12 and 17, AN (Fig. 4) discloses an amplifier circuit comprising: a coupler (440), transceiver (421) and a processor (410) formed a measuring circuit configured to measure an adjacent channel leakage ratio (ACLR) of a power amplifier, see para. [0092]; and a supply voltage regulation circuit (430) configured to determine a regulated supply voltage from an ACLR model defined based on a change level of a supply voltage of the power amplifier and a change level of a measured ACLR defined as a difference between a reference ACLR and the measured ACLR, and to transfer the regulated supply voltage to the power amplifier, see paras. [0091], [0094] and [0139]. Regarding claim 2, which stated the measuring circuit is configured to calculate the measured ACLR based on a difference between an adjacent channel power measured from an adjacent channel of a target channel of the power amplifier and a target channel power measured from the target channel. This is inherent in the operation and configuration of ACLR. Regarding claim 10, wherein a memory is inherently seen in the processor (410) configured to store the ACLR model. Regarding claim 11, wherein the supply voltage regulation circuit (430) is configured to obtain from the memory (processor (410)) the change level of the supply voltage when the change level of the measured ACLR corresponds to a specific value in the ACLR model, and to determine a difference between a reference supply voltage and the change level of the supply voltage as the regulated supply voltage. Regarding claim 16, which stated measured ACLR includes is based on a change in at least one of a frequency of a target channel and the supply voltage with respect to the power amplifier. This is inherent in the operation and configuration of ACLR. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9, 13-15 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 3-9, prior art(s) does not disclose a modeling circuit configured to obtain change data from a dataset including a plurality of ACLRs, and to model the ACLR model based on a correlation between the change level of the supply voltage and the change data. Regarding claims 13-15, prior art(s) does not disclose obtaining change data from a dataset including a plurality of ACLRs; and modeling the ACLR model based on a correlation between the change level of the supply voltage and the change data. Regarding claims 18 and 19, prior art(s) does not disclose the at least one processor to: model the ACLR model to have, as a dependent variable, an upper limit value of a range of the change level of the measured ACLR corresponding to a standard deviation of the change level of the measured ACLR with respect to the change level of the supply voltage. Regarding claim 20, prior art(s) does not disclose obtain the change level of the supply voltage when the change level of the measured ACLR corresponds to a specific value in the ACLR model stored in the memory; and determine a difference between a reference supply voltage and the change level of the supply voltage as the regulated supply voltage. Conclusion The prior arts made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Komninakis et al. (20130257529); Yamamoto et al. (8,773,201); Stulemeijer et al. (20230396219) are considered to be the closest prior art to the subject matters claimed. However, they all lack additional circuit, such as modeling circuit as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Khanh V. Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1767. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JESSICA HAN can be reached on (571) 272-2078. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application lnformation Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHANH V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700839
AN AMPLIFIER ARRANGEMENT WITH ENHANCED HARMONIC REJECTION
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700834
PHASE COMPENSATION CIRCUIT MODULE, POWER AMPLIFICATION ASSEMBLY, AND COMPENSATION METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695432
POWER AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS WITH FREQUENCY RESPONSE COMPENSATION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695430
CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR PROTECTING POWER AMPLIFIER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689344
CRYOGENIC PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIER CONTROL APPARATUS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+2.0%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1197 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month