Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/627,296

IQV METRIC FOR ‘FALSE COLOR’ ARTIFACTS IN CHROMATIC AREAS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Examiner
SETH, MANAV
Art Unit
2672
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
716 granted / 789 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 1. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/04/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections 2. Claims 1, 8 and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites a limitation “defining, for each mixed color patch, the IQV metric for the for the mixed color patch as a function of the distance metrics of each mixed color texture pixel in the mixed color patch”. The combination of words as in bold as cited “for the for the” should read as “for the”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 recites a limitation “defining, for each mixed color patch, the IQV metric for the for the mixed color patch as a function of the distance metrics of each mixed color texture pixel in the mixed color patch”. The combination of words as in bold as cited “for the for the” should read as “for the”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 14 recites a limitation “defining, for each mixed color patch, the IQV metric for the for the mixed color patch as a function of the distance metrics of each mixed color texture pixel in the mixed color patch”. The combination of words as in bold as cited “for the for the” should read as “for the”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 4. Claims 4, 7, 9, 12, 17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation "pixel values in the flat area pure color patch". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the flat area pure color patch” in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation " P^i is the mixed color pixel in the color mixed texture area". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the color mixed texture area” in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation " P^i is the mixed color pixel in the color mixed texture area". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the color mixed texture area” in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitation "pixel values in the flat area pure color patch". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the flat area pure color patch” in the claim. Claim 17 recites the limitation "pixel values in the flat area pure color patch". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the flat area pure color patch” in the claim. Claim 20 recites the limitation " P^i is the mixed color pixel in the color mixed texture area". There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the color mixed texture area” in the claim. 5. Claims 1-3, 5-6, 8, 10-11, 13-16 and 18-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons of allowance: The instant invention is directed to quantifying the severity of false color (color distortion). The closest prior art of record (e.g. Han et al., January 2024, “No-Reference Color Dot Artifact Assessment for Remosaiced Images” (pp. 265-1 - 265-6)) teaches receiving a digital image and processing in an ISP to generate RGB image (1st para of right column of page 265-1 and figure 1); and further teaches calculating the Euclidean/Chromatic distances in the CIELAB between color regions/pixels (section 2) and further teaches quantifying the severity of false color (color distortion) which is defining the IQV metric (section 3 – Score Calculation); but does not explicitly teach performing directional adjustments on each of the Euclidean/Chromatic distances and further adding Han does not explicitly teach calculating Euclidean/Chromatic distances between pixels of mixed color patch and a center of flat pure color patch, as recited in the claims 1, 8 and 14. Therefore, claims 1, 8 and 14 are allowable. Claims 2-3, 5-6, 8, 10-11, 13-16, and 18-19 are allowable for just being dependent on claims 1, 8 and 14. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Manav Seth whose telephone number is (571) 272-7456. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Sumati Lefkowitz, can be reached on (571) 272-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000 /Manav Seth/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2672 January 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597243
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579633
PERIODIC-PATTERN BACKGROUND REMOVAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567269
METHOD OF TRAINING IMAGE CAPTIONING MODEL AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561969
Object Re-Identification Apparatus and Method Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555368
Method for Temporal Correction of Multimodal Data
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month