Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/627,391

METHODS PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT AND BASE STATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Examiner
SHAHNAMI, AMIR
Art Unit
2483
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
345 granted / 427 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
442
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 427 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim under CN 202310371220 filed on 4/7/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over 3GPP; TSG RAN; NR; NR and NG-RAN Overall Description; Stage 2 (Release 17)', 3GPP TS 38.300 V17.4.0 (3GPP), in view of 3GPP; TSG RAN; NR; User Equipment (UE) procedures in Idle mode and RRC Inactive state (Release 17)', 3GPP TS 38.304 V17.4.0 (3GPP-1). Regarding Claim 1, 3GPP discloses a method performed by a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: in a radio resource control (RRC) idle or RRC inactive and information on a reference location of a serving cell; and in case that a distance between the UE in the RRC idle or the RRC inactive and the reference location of the serving cell is larger than the threshold, performing the location-based measurement for cell reselection (3GPP p.175 s.16.14.3.3 Measurements – see assistance information with common TA parameters and the UE can perform time-based and location based measurements on neighbor cells in RRC_IDLE/RCC_INACTIVE). However, 3GPP does not disclose receiving, from a base station, a system information block (SIB) including information on a threshold for a location-based measurement 3GPP-1 teaches receiving, from a base station, a system information block (SIB) including information on a threshold for a location-based measurement (3GPP-1 p.23 s.5.2.4.2 Measurement Rules for Cell Re-selection – Following rules are used by the UE to limit needed measurements: If the serving cell fulfils Srxlev > SIntraSearchP and Squal > SIntraSearchQ: If distanceThresh and referenceLocation are broadcasted in SIB19, and if UE supports location-based measurement initiation and has obtained its location information) Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify 3GPP receiving, from a base station, a system information block (SIB) including information on a threshold for a location-based measurement, as taught by 3GPP-1. One would be motivated as the threshold would be parameters measured for the max distance. Regarding Claim 2, 3GPP and 3GPP-1 teach the method of claim 1, as outlined above. However, 3GPP does not explicitly disclose the location-based measurement for the cell reselection is performed, in case that location information of the UE is obtained 3GPP-1 teaches the location-based measurement for the cell reselection is performed, in case that location information of the UE is obtained (3GPP-1 p.23 s.5.2.4.2 Measurement Rules for Cell Re-selection – Following rules are used by the UE to limit needed measurements: If the serving cell fulfils Srxlev > SIntraSearchP and Squal > SIntraSearchQ: If distanceThresh and referenceLocation are broadcasted in SIB19, and if UE supports location-based measurement initiation and has obtained its location information…the UE shall perform measurements of NR inter-frequency cells of equal or lower priority, or inter-RAT frequency cells of lower priority). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify 3GPP to have location-based measurement for the cell reselection is performed, in case that location information of the UE is obtained, as taught by 3GPP-1. One would be motivated to reduce processing of measurements by limiting the conditions to do a location-based measurement. Regarding Claim 3, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the SIB further includes information on a list of neighbour cells (3GPP p.58 s.7.3.1 Overview – SIB3 contains information about the serving frequency and intra-frequency neighbouring cells relevant for cell re-selection (including cell re-selection parameters common for a frequency as well as cell specific re-selection parameters)). Regarding Claim 4, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 3, wherein the information on the list of the neighbour cells includes information on a frequency and information on a cell identity (ID) (3GPP p.63 s.8.2 Network Identities – The PLMN ID included in the NCGI should be the first PLMN ID within the set of PLMN IDs associated to the NR Cell Identity in SIB1, following the order of broadcast). Regarding Claim 5, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: camping on a cell which meets reselection criterion based on the location-based measurement (3GPP p.175 s.16.14.3.3 Measurements – Measurement rules for cell re-selection based on timing information and location information). Regarding Claim 6, 3GPP1, in combination, teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the SIB further includes coverage information of the serving cell (3GPP-1 p.23 s.5.2.4.2 Measurement Rules for Cell Re-selection – Following rules are used by the UE to limit needed measurements: If the serving cell fulfils Srxlev > SIntraSearchP and Squal > SIntraSearchQ: If distanceThresh and referenceLocation are broadcasted in SIB19). Regarding Claim 7, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: performing a time-based measurement based on information associated with time the serving cell stops serving an area in which the UE is included (3GPP p.175 s.16.14.3.3 Measurements – see assistance information with common TA parameters and the UE can perform time-based and location based measurements on neighbor cells in RRC_IDLE/RCC_INACTIVE). Regarding Claim 8, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the information on the reference location is referenced to time (3GPP p.175 s.16.14.3.3 Measurements – see assistance information with common TA parameters and the UE can perform time-based and location based measurements on neighbor cells in RRC_IDLE/RCC_INACTIVE). Regarding Claim 9, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the serving cell is associated with an earth moving system (3GPP p.172-173, s.16.14.1 Overview – Figure 16.14.1-1 below illustrates an example of a Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) providing non-terrestrial NR access to the UE by means of an NTN payload and an NTN Gateway, depicting a service link between the NTN payload and a UE, and a feeder link between the NTN Gateway and the NTN payload; Three types of service links are supported: Earth-moving: provisioned by beam(s) whose coverage area slides over the Earth surface (e.g., the case of NGSO satellites generating fixed or non-steerable beams)). Regarding Claim 10, 3GPP, in combination, further discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the location-based measurement includes an intra-frequency measurement or an inter-frequency measurement (3GPP-1 p.23 s.5.2.4.2 Measurement Rules for Cell Re-selection – the UE shall perform measurements of NR inter-frequency cells of equal or lower priority, or inter-RAT frequency cells of lower priority). With regard to claim 11, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 1 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 1 is applied to claim 11. With regard to claim 12, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 2 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 2 is applied to claim 12. With regard to claim 13, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 3 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 3 is applied to claim 13. With regard to claim 14, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 4 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 4 is applied to claim 14. With regard to claim 15, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 5 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 5 is applied to claim 15. With regard to claim 16, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 6 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 6 is applied to claim 16. With regard to claim 17, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 7 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 7 is applied to claim 17. With regard to claim 18, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 8 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 8 is applied to claim 18. With regard to claim 19, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 9 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 9 is applied to claim 19. With regard to claim 20, the claim limitations are essentially the same as claim 10 but in a different embodiment. Therefore, the rational used to reject claim 10 is applied to claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMIR SHAHNAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-0707. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571-272-7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMIR SHAHNAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604016
CONDITIONAL APPLICATION OF REFINEMENT TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598325
Signaling of Preselection Information in Media Files Based on a Movie-level Track Group Information Box
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593130
TRACKING CAMERA, TRACKING CAMERA SYSTEMS, AND OPERATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592081
ASSISTANCE CONTROLLING APPARATUS, ASSISTANCE CONTROLLING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593051
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY INDICATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month