Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/627,475

RADIO FREQUENCY MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2023 — JP 2023-065158
Examiner
POOS, JOHN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1306 granted / 1397 resolved
+33.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§102
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1397 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 17, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lehtola (US 2018/0026594), in view of Gotou et al. (US 2005/0231286). In regard to Claim 1: Lehtola discloses, in Figure 11, a radio frequency module comprising: a carrier amplifier (1107) and a peak amplifier (1108); a branching circuit (1102) connected to an input end of the carrier amplifier (1107 input) and an input end of the peak amplifier (1108 input); a synthesis circuit (1110) connected to an output end of the carrier amplifier (107 output) and an output end of the peak amplifier (108 output); and a control circuit (1182) configured to vary a threshold value of a bias voltage of the peak amplifier (¶ 0094) based on a radio frequency signal input (1162) to the branching circuit (1102) or the carrier amplifier (1107), and a signal indicating a drive level of the carrier amplifier (¶ 0093). Lehtola does not disclose wherein the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier are included in a first integrated circuit, the control circuit is included in a second integrated circuit, and the second integrated circuit is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit on a carrier amplifier side out of the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier. Gotou discloses, in Figure 13, wherein the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18) are included in a first integrated circuit (14a), the control circuit (46) is included in a second integrated circuit (12), and the second integrated circuit (12) is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit (14a) on a carrier amplifier side out (16 output) of the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to use the integrated circuits taught by Gotou with the carrier and peak amplifiers taught by Lehtola, in order to provide a compact Doherty high-frequency power amplifier having a simple configuration that outputs signals of good quality with minimized distortion (Gotou Paragraph 0120). In regard to Claim 17: Lehtola discloses, in Figure 11, a radio frequency module comprising: a carrier amplifier (1107) and a peak amplifier (1108); a branching circuit (1102) connected to an input end of the carrier amplifier (1107 input) and an input end of the peak amplifier (1108 input); a synthesis circuit (1110) connected to an output end of the carrier amplifier (107 output) and an output end of the peak amplifier (108 output); and a control circuit (1182) configured to vary a threshold value of a bias voltage (¶ 0094) of the peak amplifier (1108), wherein a first input end of the control circuit (1182) is connected to the input end of the carrier amplifier (1182 input is connected to 1107 input via 1102), a second input end (1130) of the control circuit is connected to a bias circuit of the carrier amplifier (1107, ¶ 0093), an output end of the control circuit (1182) is connected to a bias circuit of the peak amplifier (1108). Lehtola does not disclose the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier are included in a first integrated circuit, the control circuit is included in a second integrated circuit, and the second integrated circuit is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit on a carrier amplifier side out of the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier. Gotou discloses, in Figure 13, wherein the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18) are included in a first integrated circuit (14a), the control circuit (46) is included in a second integrated circuit (12), and the second integrated circuit (12) is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit (14a) on a carrier amplifier side out (16 output) of the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to use the integrated circuits taught by Gotou with the carrier and peak amplifiers taught by Lehtola, in order to provide a compact Doherty high-frequency power amplifier having a simple configuration that outputs signals of good quality with minimized distortion (Gotou Paragraph 0120). In regard to Claim 19: Lehtola discloses, in Figure 11, a radio frequency module comprising: a carrier amplifier (1107) and a peak amplifier (1108); a branching circuit (1102) connected to an input end of the carrier amplifier (1107 input) and an input end of the peak amplifier (1108 input); a synthesis circuit (1110) connected to an output end of the carrier amplifier (107 output) and an output end of the peak amplifier (108 output); and a control circuit (1182), wherein a first input end of the control circuit (1182) is connected to an input end of the branching circuit or the input end of the carrier amplifier (1182 input is connected to 1107 input via 1102), a second input end of the control circuit (1182) is connected to the output end of the carrier amplifier (1130 of 1107), an output end of the control circuit (1182) is connected to the peak amplifier (1108, ¶ 0093). Lehtola does to disclose the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier are included in a first integrated circuit, the control circuit is included in a second integrated circuit, and the second integrated circuit is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit on a carrier amplifier side out of the carrier amplifier and the peak amplifier. Gotou discloses, in Figure 13, wherein the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18) are included in a first integrated circuit (14a), the control circuit (46) is included in a second integrated circuit (12), and the second integrated circuit (12) is disposed adjacent to the first integrated circuit (14a) on a carrier amplifier side out (16 output) of the carrier amplifier (16) and the peak amplifier (18). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to use the integrated circuits taught by Gotou with the carrier and peak amplifiers taught by Lehtola, in order to provide a compact Doherty high-frequency power amplifier having a simple configuration that outputs signals of good quality with minimized distortion (Gotou Paragraph 0120). Claims 2-16, 18, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. In regard to Claim 2: None of the prior art or combination thereof teaches or fairly suggests the following features in combination with the other limitations of the claims: wherein the control circuit includes a drive level detection circuit connected to the output end of the carrier amplifier and configured to output the signal indicating the drive level of the carrier amplifier, and a peak bias control circuit connected to an input end of the branching circuit or the input end of the carrier amplifier, and the drive level detection circuit, and configured to output a control signal for varying the threshold value of the bias voltage of the peak amplifier to a bias circuit of the peak amplifier. In regard to Claim 18: None of the prior art or combination thereof teaches or fairly suggests the following features in combination with the other limitations of the claims: further comprising: a module substrate, wherein the first integrated circuit and the second integrated circuit are disposed on a main surface of the module substrate, and in a plan view of the module substrate, the second integrated circuit is disposed closer to the carrier amplifier than the peak amplifier. In regard to Claim 20: None of the prior art or combination thereof teaches or fairly suggests the following features in combination with the other limitations of the claims: further comprising: a module substrate, wherein the first integrated circuit and the second integrated circuit are disposed on a main surface of the module substrate, and in a plan view of the module substrate, the second integrated circuit is disposed closer to the carrier amplifier than the peak amplifier. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (US 2004/0113698) discloses a signal amplifier includes a splitter for splitting an input signal into first and second signals, first and second bias control networks for generating a base bias signal for a Doherty amplifier in accordance with a power level of the input signal, a carrier amplifier for amplifying the first input signal, a peaking amplifier for amplifying the second input signal and a Doherty output network for combining the amplified signals. Nishimori (US 2017/0264247) discloses a power amplification apparatus which is a Doherty power amplification apparatus includes a main amplifier configured to amplify an input signal, and an auxiliary amplifier configured to amplify the input signal when a level of the input signal is higher than a predetermined level. Imai (US 2024/0186956) discloses the doherty amplification circuit (10) has a carrier amplifier (12) that amplifies an input high-frequency signal. A peak amplifier (16) amplifies the input high-frequency signal. A first bias circuit (14,15) biases the carrier amplifier. A second bias circuit (18,19) biases the peak amplifier. A control circuit (21) controls the second bias circuit based on an input high-frequency signal and a signal representing the drive level of the carrier amplifier. Khlat (US 11,108,360) discloses a Doherty amplifier system includes a carrier amplifier having a main input for receiving a first portion of a radio frequency (RF) signal and a main output in communication with a RF signal output. A peaking amplifier has a peak input for receiving a second portion of the RF signal and a peak output in communication with the RF signal output. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John W Poos whose telephone number is (571)270-5077. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached at 571-272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN W POOS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702340
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH NEURAL RECORDING
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706583
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPEDANCE MATCHING IN PLASMA CREATION AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700655
MICROELECTRONIC DEVICE PACKAGE WITH INTEGRAL WAVEGUIDE TRANSITION
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700656
COUPLER
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695648
SIGNAL TRANSFER ASSEMBLY WITH CAPACITIVE COUPLING
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.6%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1397 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month