Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/628,131

IN-VEHICLE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Examiner
WANG, RONGFA PHILIP
Art Unit
2199
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Subaru Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
452 granted / 534 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
553
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§103
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 534 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detail Action This office action is in response to the application filed on 4/5/2024. Claims 1-5 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang, (CN 201811518405 A) in view of Heeter (US 2023/0376997 A9) Per claim 1, Tang discloses An in-vehicle apparatus to be applied to a vehicle, the in-vehicle apparatus comprising (pp. 3, 3rd para., discloses vehicle entertainment system corresponding to an in-vehicle apparatus): A communicator (pp.3, discloses downloading software package to the vehicle entertainment system inherently discloses a communicator to enable download). Download a data file from server (see above) Tang does not, however, Heeter discloses a communicator configured to communicate with a first portable device; a display configured to display a pattern image comprising first setting data indicating a connection setting to a server; ([0241], discloses a device displays a QR code corresponding to pattern image that is scannable by a smartphone corresponding to a portable device, [0024], scan of QR code by users smartphone with “tethered” connection between the device and the user’s smartphone…facilitate secure internet service (to a server) for purpose of downloading firmware update to the device. Since the secure internet service to a server is produced by scanning the QR code, corresponding setting data to connect to a server is disclosed. [0244], discloses QR code contain embedded data string information for configuring the device.) a processor configured to request the first portable device communicably coupled to the communicator to establish a communication connection to the server based on the first setting data acquired by capturing the pattern image and download a data file from the server. (Continue from above, see secure internet service as a result of scanning QR code for downloading firmware update to a device via establishing a communication connection to the server.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Heeter into the teachings of Tang to include the limitation disclosed by Heeter. The modification would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to want to update device firmware based on QR code generated by the device so matching software/firmware can be downloaded to the device for update. Per claim 2, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated; Tang/Heeter discloses wherein the pattern image further comprises second setting data indicating a connection setting to the communicator, and the processor is configured to request the first portable device to establish a communication connection to the communicator based on the second setting data acquired by capturing the pattern image. (Heeter, [0024], scan of QR code by users smartphone with “tethered” connection between the device and the user’s smartphone is configured using second setting data as from QR code.) Per claim 3, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated; Tang/Heeter discloses wherein the communicator is further configured to communicate with a second portable device, and the processor is further configured to request the second portable device communicably coupled to the communicator to establish a communication connection to the server based on the first setting data acquired by capturing the pattern image and download a data file from the server. (continue, Heeter, [0241] where a smartphone corresponds to a portable device where it can be first portable device or a second portable device.) Per claim 5, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated; Tang/Heeter discloses wherein the communicator is configured to receive the data file downloaded from the server and transmitted from the first portable device communicably coupled to the communicator.( Heeter, [0024], scan of QR code by users smartphone with “tethered” connection between the device and the user’s smartphone…facilitate secure internet service (to a server) for purpose of downloading firmware update to the device.) Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang, (CN 201811518405 A) in view of Heeter (US 2023/0376997 A9) and further in view of Wehrman et al. (US 20150363210 A1) Per claim 4, the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated; Tang/Heeter discloses and the display is configured to display the pattern image when the operation input unit receives an operational input indicating that the software is to be updated. (Heeterm [0241], discloses device is activated into setup mode…then QR code is generated…[0242], downloading firmware update) Tang/Heeter does not, however, Wehrman discloses further comprising an operation input unit configured to receive an operational input performed by an occupant of the vehicle, wherein the communicator is configured to communicate with the server, the display is configured to display a message asking the occupant whether to update software when the communicator receives, from the server,( [0050], discloses message prompt to user via display if user agree to update) a notification indicating that the data file configured to update the software is in the server, ([0058], discloses indications of software updates including links or other identifiers of software updates) Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Wehrman into the teachings of Tang/Heeter to include the limitation disclosed by Wehrman. The modification would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to want to ensure user satisfaction via agreement confirmation by user prior to software update. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. It is noted that any citation [[s]] to specific, pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the references should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. [[See, MPEP 2123]] Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Philip Wang whose telephone number is 571-272-5934. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday 8:00AM -4:00PM. Any inquiry of general nature or relating to the status of this application should be directed to the TC2100 Group receptionist: 571-272-2100. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lewis Bullock, can be reached at 571-272-3759. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /PHILIP WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2199
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596341
OPERATION LOOP FORMATION FOR ADAPTIVE POWER GRID MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596622
VENDOR ONBOARDING AND PRE-DEPLOYMENT SERVICE TESTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591503
DEBUGGING INSTRUCTION EXECUTION ERRORS IN A SIMULATED COMPUTER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12579054
APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TEST METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566689
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CALCULATION OF TEST AUTOMATION FEASIBILITY INDICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 534 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month