Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/629,021

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Examiner
SOLINSKY, PETER G
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
611 granted / 685 resolved
+31.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 685 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 - 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Horn, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2022/0330352. Horn teaches: 1. A wireless communication device comprising: a first wireless communication circuit (a communication circuit is being broadly interpreted as any connection between two devices, a relay UE connects to a radio access network (RAN), see Fig. 8); a second wireless communication circuit (a remote UE connects to the relay UE, see Fig. 8); and a controller, wherein the controller notifies an external device, using the second wireless communication circuit, that the external device becomes connectable to a network generated by the first wireless communication circuit (connections are established, which would inherently include notifications between all devices, to allow the remote UE to communicate with the RAN through the relay UE, see Fig. 8). 2. The wireless communication device according to claim 1, wherein the controller provides the notification when the network is generated in response to a request from the external device (see Fig. 8, a set up occurs for both the remote UE and relay UE, also, credentials may be exchanged, [0005]), and does not provide the notification when the network is not generated in response to the request from the external device (not providing a signal when nothing occurs is generally a standard practice, i.e. fire alarms do not make a noise when there is no fire detected and batteries are fully operational). 3. The wireless communication device according to claim 2, wherein the request is received through the second wireless communication circuit (see Fig. 8, a set up occurs for both the remote UE and relay UE, also, credentials may be exchanged, [0005]). 4. The wireless communication device according to claim 2, wherein when the network is not generated in response to the request from the external device is when the network is generated in response to an operation on the wireless communication device (a relay circuit is established, the communication could occur in either direction which could cause the RAT to initiate the flow rather than the remote UE). 5. The wireless communication device according to claim 1, wherein the second wireless communication circuit uses a wireless communication scheme that has a shorter communication range than a wireless communication scheme used by the first wireless communication circuit, to communicate with the external device (relay connection can occur through BLE, [0105], which is considered a short range connection). 6. A wireless communication device comprising: a first wireless communication circuit (a communication circuit is being broadly interpreted as any connection between two devices, a relay UE connects to a radio access network (RAN), see Fig. 8, Horn); a second wireless communication circuit (a remote UE connects to the relay UE, see Fig. 8); and a controller, wherein when the controller receives a notification indicating that a network that is connectable by the first wireless communication circuit, from an external device through the second wireless communication circuit (connections are established, which would inherently include notifications between all devices, to allow the remote UE to communicate with the RAN through the relay UE, see Fig. 8), if the notification is a notification provided in response to a request transmitted to the external device, the controller transmits a request to join the network to the external device, using the first wireless communication circuit (under a broadest reasonable interpretation, any actions following the term “if” do not necessarily occur and are not given patentable weight, Examiner suggests utilizing the term “responsive to” in place of “if”), and if the notification is not a notification provided in response to the request, the controller does not transmit a request to join the network to the external device, using the first wireless communication circuit (under a broadest reasonable interpretation, any actions following the term “if” do not necessarily occur and are not given patentable weight). 7. The wireless communication device according to claim 6, wherein the controller determines that the notification is a notification provided in response to the request when the notification is addressed to the wireless communication device (a relay circuit is established, the communication could occur in either direction which could cause the RAT to initiate the flow rather than the remote UE). 8. The wireless communication device according to claim 6, wherein the controller determines that the notification is not a notification provided in response to the request when the notification is a broadcast message (broadcasting may be responsible for session management (stop/start), [0060]). 9. The wireless communication device according to claim 6, wherein the second wireless communication circuit uses a wireless communication scheme that has a shorter communication range than a wireless communication scheme used by the first wireless communication circuit, to communicate with the external device (relay connection can occur through BLE, [0105], which is considered a short range connection). 10. A control method for a wireless communication device that includes first wireless communication circuit and second wireless communication circuit, comprising: notifying an external device, using the second wireless communication circuit, that the external device becomes connectable to a network generated by the first wireless communication circuit (connections are established, which would inherently include notifications between all devices, to allow the remote UE to communicate with the RAN through the relay UE, see Fig. 8). 11. A control method for a wireless communication device that includes first wireless communication circuit and second wireless communication circuit, comprising: receiving, by the second wireless communication circuit, from an external device, a notification indicating that a network that is connectable by the first wireless communication circuit has been generated (connections are established, which would inherently include notifications between all devices, to allow the remote UE to communicate with the RAN through the relay UE, see Fig. 8); if the notification is a notification provided in response to a request transmitted to the external device, transmitting a request to join the network to the external device, using the first wireless communication circuit (under a broadest reasonable interpretation, any actions following the term “if” do not necessarily occur and are not given patentable weight, Examiner suggests utilizing the term “responsive to” in place of “if”); and if the notification is not a notification provided in response to the request, not transmitting the request to join the network to the external device (under a broadest reasonable interpretation, any actions following the term “if” do not necessarily occur and are not given patentable weight, Examiner suggests utilizing the term “responsive to” in place of “if”). 12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a program that, when executed by a computer included in a wireless communication device that includes first wireless communication circuit and second wireless communication circuit, causes the computer to notify external device, using the second wireless communication circuit, that the external device becomes connectable to a network generated by the first wireless communication circuit (connections are established, which would inherently include notifications between all devices, to allow the remote UE to communicate with the RAN through the relay UE, see Fig. 8). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER G SOLINSKY whose telephone number is (571)270-7216. The examiner can normally be reached M - Th, 6:30 A - 5:00 P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad Nawaz can be reached at 571-272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PETER G. SOLINSKY Examiner Art Unit 2463 /Peter G Solinsky/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603738
PILOT DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598624
FEEDBACK CORRESPONDING TO UNIFIED TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATIONS IN DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION WITHOUT DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588022
CHANNEL MAP ALLOCATION TO SUBFRAMES IN PERIODIC ADVERTISEMENT WITH RESPONSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574184
Remaining Minimum System Information Communication Method and Related Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568510
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING MULTIPLE TCI STATES PER CORESET IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+1.9%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month