Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/629,073

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORMING A STRUCTURE INCLUDING A BIO-BASED RESIN PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Examiner
SALVATORE, LYNDA
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
637 granted / 997 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1061
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.0%
+33.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 997 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 1. Applicant's election with traverse of Group II, claims 10-19 in the reply filed on 1/7/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Applicants have amended claims 1 and 20 to include the structural features of claim 10 and asserts that the requirement for restriction is now moot. This is not found persuasive because as set forth in the requirement for restriction, claims 1-9 and 20 are directed to a method of coupling first, second and third layers together and claims 10-19 are directed to the layered product comprising first, second and third layers. The search required for the method of coupling the first, second and third layers together is separate from the search required for the product. Since the method and the article constitute distinct inventions, the Examiner is of the position that searching two distinct inventions would create undue burden. As such, the Examiner maintains the requirement for restriction. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 3. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 4. With regard to claim 17, it is not clear to the Examiner what is meant by the phrase “configured to change responsive to exposure of the first layer component, the second layer component and the third layer component to the one or more curing conditions”. Specifically, it is not clear what is configured to “change”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claim(s) 10-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sweatman et al., GB 2529571 A. With regard to claim 10, the published GB patent issued to Sweatman et al., teach a laminated composite comprising first, second and third core layers wherein first and second core layers are made from natural fibers impregnated with a bio-based resin such as a furan resin (PFA) (abstract, figure 4a and page 6, 35-page 7, 5). With regard to the second core layer, Sweatman et al., teach that the second core layer can be cellular and made from materials such as paper or card (page 7, 25-30). Sweatman et al., further teach that second core layer located between the first and third core layers is bonded by the impregnated bio-based resin in the first and third core layers (abstract, page 7, 5-10 and page 4, 5-15). With regard to the claimed fabric layers, since Sweatman et al., teach that the first and third core layer comprise a network of fibers impregnated with bio-based resin, the fabric limitations are considered met. With regard to claims 11 and 12, figure 4a of Sweatman et al., teach the first top and first bottom surfaces of the individual layers wherein further the layers are coupled together to form a laminate. The Examiner considers this sufficient to meet the limitations of claims 11 and 12. With regard to claim 13, as set forth above, Sweatman et al., teach the claimed PFA resin. With regard to claim 14, the first core layer comprising a network of fibers is impregnated with the bio-based resin (see above). With regard to claim 15, Sweatman et al., teach that bio-based resin is capable of forming a bonding bridge between the second core layer and the first and/or third core layers. As such, the Examiner is of the position that since the first and second core layers are impregnated with the bio-based resin and further coupled to either side of the second core layer, the limitations of claim 15 are considered met. In other words, bio-based resin would be present on both exterior surfaces of the second core layer with the first and third bio-resin impregnated fabric layers are applied to either side. With regard to claims 16, 17 and 19 Sweatman et al., teach curing takes place in a heated moulding press. In addition, the individual layers can be pre-cured via heat/steam prior to assembly (page 11, 20-page 13, 15). With regard to claim 18, Sweatman et al., teach using the composite in an airline gallery cart (abstract). Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNDA SALVATORE whose telephone number is (571)272-1482. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached at 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LYNDA SALVATORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674261
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ABRASION RESISTANT MESH FABRIC AND ABRASION RESISTANT MESH FABRIC MADE BY THE MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12612719
PILE KNIT FABRIC FOR INTERIOR MATERIALS OF VEHICLES, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND MANUFACTURING MACHINE OF PILE KNIT FABRIC
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12595595
PHOTOCHROMIC LIQUID CRYSTAL ELECTROSPUN COAXIAL POLYMER FIBERS
4y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583191
RESIN FORMED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING RESIN FORMED ARTICLE
4y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583530
CONSTRUCTION OF A VEHICLE FLOOR GARNISH
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+19.6%)
3y 6m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 997 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month