Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/629,130

LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD AND LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Priority
Apr 11, 2023 — JP 2023-064301
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 1391 resolved
-25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
151 currently pending
Career history
1528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1391 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wells, Jr. et al. (2013/0229473) in view of Chen et al. (9,318,835). Regarding claim 1, Wells, Jr. teaches liquid discharge head comprising: a supply connector (fig. 1C, item 11) connectable to a supply path to be supplied with a liquid from the supply path ([0036]); a signal connector (fig. 1C, item 157) connectable to a signal wire through which an electrical signal is transmitted ([0041]). Wells, Jr. does not teach a cover movable between: an exposing position where the signal connector is exposed to be connectable with the signal wire; and a covering position where the cover covers the signal connector from which the signal wire is disconnected, wherein the cover includes a rib on a part of an upper face of the cover Chen teaches this (Chen, fig. 16, Note cover 34 covering and exposing electrical connector 321. Note rib 343 on top of cover in figure). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to add a cover of the type disclosed by Chen to the electrical connector disclosed by Wells, Jr. because doing so would help prevent contact of debris and foreign materials with the electrical connector when the connector was not connected to an electrical source. Upon combination of Hung with Wells, Jr., the resultant device would mean the limitation: wherein the cover covers the signal connector from above in a direction of gravity and wherein the upper face of the cover faces in a direction opposite to a direction of gravity when the liquid discharge head is mounted on a carriage. That is, Wells, Jr.’s electrical connector protrudes upward from its printhead, and Chen’s cover’s upper face faces upward. Regarding claim 2, Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches the liquid discharge head according to claim 1, wherein the cover at the covering position covers an entire of a connection face of the signal connector above the connection face (Chen, see fig. 16). Regarding claim 3, Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches the liquid discharge head according to claim 1, wherein the cover moves from the covering position to the exposing position in response to a connection of the signal wire to the signal connector (Chen, fig. 16, Note that the cover must be moved to connect the connector to a signal connector). Regarding claim 4, Wells, Jr. in view of Chenb teaches the liquid discharge head according to claim 1, wherein the cover is biased toward the covering position (Chen, see fig. 17). Regarding claim 5 Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches the liquid discharge head according to claim 1, wherein the cover is swingable between the exposing position and the covering position in a swing direction (Chen, compares figs. 16, 17). Regarding claim 6 Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches a liquid discharge apparatus comprising: the liquid discharge head according to claim 5, wherein the signal wire includes a signal wire support at a leading end of the signal wire to support the signal wire, the cover includes a projection contactable with the signal wire support of the signal wire, the signal wire support of the signal wire being connected to the signal connector contacts the projection of the cover to cause the cover to swing from the covering position to the exposing position; and the signal wire support of the signal wire being disconnected from the signal connector causes the projection of the cover contacting the signal wire support to swing from the exposing position to the covering position (See Chen, figs. 16, 17, Wells, Jr., fig. 1C, Note that, upon combination of the prior art teachings, the positional limitations are met). Regarding claim 8, Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches the liquid discharge head according to claim 1, wherein the rib projects above from the upper face of the cover at a leading end side of the cover in the swing direction from the exposing position to the covering position (Chen, see figs. 16, 17). Regarding claim 9, Wells, Jr. in view of Chen teaches a liquid discharge apparatus comprising: the liquid discharge head according to claim 1; a carriage (Wells, Jr., fig. 1A, item 1016) on which the liquid discharge head is mountable; the supply path to supply the liquid to the liquid discharge head (Wells, Jr., see fig 1); and the signal wire to transmit the electrical signal to the liquid discharge head (Wells, Jr., see fig. 1). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in light of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICARDO MAGALLANES can be reached at 571-202-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 31, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752537
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE CONTROL METHOD AND LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741466
WIPER UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734799
SUBSTRATE TREATING CONTROL METHOD, SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS, SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM STORED IN COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734815
CARTRIDGE AND PRINTING APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734830
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+6.2%)
3y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month