Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/629,559

WAVEFORM DATA TRANSMISSION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Priority
Sep 01, 2022 — CN 202211067582.6 +1 more
Examiner
UDDIN, MD I
Art Unit
2169
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
517 granted / 669 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +74% interview lift
Without
With
+73.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.4%
+46.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 669 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is response to the communication filed on January 28, 2026. Claims 1-20 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on January 28, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant arguments are addressed in the new rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xiang et al. (Pub. No. : US 20220150044 A1) in the view of Wegener (Pub. No. : US 20110078222 A1). As to clam 1 Xiang teaches a method of waveform data transmission, the method comprising: generating, by control and measurement software that is executed on a computer device in a qubit control and measurement system, control and measurement waveform data being waveform data of a first signal waveform for control and measurement of a quantum chip (paragraphs [0114], [0076], [0121], [0192]: generate and receive digital waveforms at a relatively rough timescale of an FPGA clock cycle wherein the measurement unit 11 is configured to measure a quantum state of each physical qubit in the physical qubit group corresponding to the MCSG 10, and transmit a control instruction to the control unit 12 based on a measurement result. The control unit 12 is configured to control a corresponding physical qubit according to the control instruction), the qubit control and measurement system including the computer device configured to enable a user to customize the control and measurement waveform data, an electronics system configured to generate the first signal waveform in an analog form, and at least a network switch configured to relay transmissions between the computer device and the electronics system (paragraphs [0049], [0076]-[0079], [0084], [0095], [0117]-[0119]: The measurement unit 11 is configured to measure a quantum state of each physical qubit in the physical qubit group corresponding to the MCSG 10, and transmit a control instruction wherein the user may use a computer to access a memory of a node through an Ethernet/peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe, a high-speed serial computer expansion bus) interface, to directly configure a register and debug a target node, wherein the Software Compensates for a Random Phase Difference of an Analog Signal of a different lengths of analog signal transmission lines (for reference clock and microwave output)); transmitting the first signal waveform to the quantum chip according to the recovered control and measurement waveform data (paragraphs [0119], [0124]-[0125]: transmit compensated digital waveform data to each unit, to synchronize phases of a plurality of channels). Xiang does not explicitly disclose but Wegener teaches compressing, by the control and measurement software that is executed on the computer device, the control and measurement waveform data to obtain compressed control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0093]: compress waveform data for transmitted packets); transmitting the compressed control and measurement waveform data, from the computer device to the electronics system in the qubit control and measurement system (paragraph [0093], [0103]: compressor 620 is adaptable to the specific data type and the selected compression mode (lossless or lossy) for the waveform data being transmitted to the receiving core); decompressing, by processing circuitry of the electronics system, the compressed control and measurement waveform data to obtain recovered control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0089]: decompressor 720 can generate decompressed integer waveform data values or decompressed floating-point waveform data values). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to improve the efficiency of data transfer between cores and conserves data storage resources (Wegener, abstract). As to claim 2 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 1. Xiang teaches wherein the compressing comprises: calibrating, by the control and measurement software, the control and measurement waveform data to obtain calibrated control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0192]); and Wegener teaches compressing, by the control and measurement software, the calibrated control and measurement waveform data to obtain the compressed control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0021]). As to claim 3 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 1. Xiang teaches wherein the generating the control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0114]) comprises: generating, by an experiment module of the control and measurement software, the control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0014], [0192]); calibrating, by the calibration module, the control and measurement waveform data to obtain the calibrated control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0192]); Wegener teaches compressing, by the experiment module, the control and measurement waveform data to obtain initial compressed control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0093]); transmitting the initial compressed control and measurement waveform data to a calibration module of the control and measurement software (paragraph [0093]); decompressing, by the calibration module, the initial compressed control and measurement waveform data to obtain the control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0104]); and compressing, by the calibration module, the calibrated control and measurement waveform data to obtain the compressed control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0093]). As to claim 4 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 2. Xiang teaches wherein the calibrating comprises: obtaining, by the control and measurement software, a calibration parameter of the control and measurement waveform data (paragraph [0192]); and calibrating, by the control and measurement software, the control and measurement waveform data according to the calibration parameter, to obtain the calibrated control and measurement waveform data (paragraphs [0120], [0192]). As to claim 5 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 4. Xiang teaches wherein the obtaining the calibration parameter comprises: transmitting, by the control and measurement software, defined test waveform data to the electronics system (paragraph [0119]); generating, by the electronics system, a waveform signal corresponding to the test waveform data (paragraph [0114]); obtaining, by the control and measurement software, actual waveform data based on a measurement of the waveform signal corresponding to the test waveform data (paragraph [0192]); and determining the calibration parameter according to the test waveform data and the actual waveform data (paragraph [0120]). As to claim 6 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 1. Xiang teaches wherein transmitting the recovered control and measurement waveform data to a FPGA chip included in the processing circuitry of the electronics system (paragraph [0051]); controlling, by the FPGA chip, a digital to analog converter DAC chip to generate the first signal waveform corresponding to the recovered control and measurement waveform data; and transmitting the first signal waveform to the quantum chip (paragraphs [0051]); Wegener teachesthe decompressing the compressed control and measurement waveform data comprises: decompressing, by the a processing chip included in the processing circuitry of the electronics system, the compressed control and measurement waveform data to obtain recovered control and measurement waveform data (paragraph []). As to claim 7 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 6. Xiang teaches wherein the controlling, by the FPGA chip, the DAC chip comprises: adjusting, by the FPGA chip, a format of the recovered control and measurement waveform data according to a control signal, to obtain adjusted waveform data (paragraph [0053]); and transmitting, by the FPGA chip, the adjusted waveform data to the DAC chip, the DAC chip generating the first signal waveform according to the adjusted waveform data (paragraph [0056]). As to claim 8 Xiang together with Wegener teaches a method according to claim 1. Xiang teaches measuring, by the electronics system, the quantum chip, to obtain a second signal waveform, and converting the second signal waveform into measurement waveform data of the second signal waveform (paragraph [0114]). Wegener teaches compressing, by the electronics system, the measurement waveform data (paragraph [0082]); and transmitting the compressed measurement waveform data to the control and measurement software (paragraph [0093]). As to claims 9-20, they have similar limitations as of claims 1-8 above. Hence, they are rejected under the same rational as of claims 1-8 above. Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers or paragraphs in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in its entirety as potentially teaching of all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record, listed on form PTO-892, and not relied upon, if any, is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MD I UDDIN whose telephone number is (571)270-3559. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sherief Badawi can be reached at 571-272-9782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MD I UDDIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2169
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 04, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681904
LOCK MANAGEMENT METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670215
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING TEMPORAL GRAPH WITH TIME-BOUND COMMUNITIES
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657241
Data Preparation Using Semantic Roles
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651018
DETERMINING OBJECT GEOLOCATIONS BASED ON HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12645992
SEMICONDUCTOR METROLOGY SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+73.7%)
3y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 669 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month