Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/629,921

Intelligent in vivo Capsule Device with Electrodes

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Examiner
SURGAN, ALEXANDRA L
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Capsovision Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
229 granted / 490 resolved
-23.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
533
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.2%
+16.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 490 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of group I and species b in the reply filed on 12/24/2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Status of Claims Claims 1-12 are pending, claims 1-6 an 11-12 are withdrawn from consideration, and claims 7-10 are currently under consideration for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104 Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). The certified copies have been received. Information Disclosure Statement Applicant is reminded of 37 C.F.R. 1.56 which states in part, “[e]ach individual associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application has a duty of candor and good faith in dealing with the Office, which includes a duty to disclose to the Office all information known to that individual to be material to patentability as defined in this section. The duty to disclose information exists with respect to each pending claim until the claim is cancelled or withdrawn from consideration, or the application becomes abandoned.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (U.S. 2014/0051924). With respect to claim 7, Wang teaches a capsule camera device comprising: a capsule housing (110); one or more electrodes (121,122) disposed fixedly through the capsule housing (FIG. 1B), wherein said one or more electrodes apply electrical stimulus to living body tissue in a patient’s gastrointestinal tract (para [0021]); a signal generation (310) or driver unit (320) to generate the electrical stimulus for said one or more electrodes; an image sensor to capture images from a scene illuminated by a light source (para [0018]); an image processing module (150) to determine image characteristics in one or more captured images (para [0032]); a control module coupled to said one or more electrodes to provide one or more control signals to said one or more electrodes depending on the image characteristics in said one or more captured images (FIG. 5, para [0031]-[0036]); and wherein the signal generation or driver unit, the image sensor, the image processing module and the control module are enclosed in the capsule housing (FIG. 1B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (U.S. 2014/0051924) in view of Ming et al. (U.S. 2020/0323433). Wang teaches a capsule camera device as set forth above. However, Wang does not teach at least two light sources which are capable of generating at least two spectrums. With respect to claim 8, Ming et al. teaches a capsule camera device comprising at least two light sources to illuminate lumen walls of a GI (gastrointestinal) tract, wherein said at least two light sources are capable of generating at least two spectrums (para [0036]-[0037]). With respect to claim 9, Ming et al. teaches the control module or a second control module, coupled to said at least two light sources, selects one or more selected light sources from said at least two light sources depending on the image characteristics in said one or more captured images (para [0042], FIG. 4). With respect to claim 10, Ming et la. teaches the image characteristics in said one or more captured images comprise pathological significance in said one or more captured images (para [0042], FIG. 4). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to modify Wang to utilize the at least two light sources which are capable of generating at least two spectrums in the manner taught by Ming et al. in order to s help the physician to predict the type of pathological tissue and the depth of invasion of early cancer, so as to provides guide for treatment (para [0049] of Ming et al.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alexandra Newton Surgan whose telephone number is (571)270-1618. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Carey can be reached at (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDRA L NEWTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593958
ENDOSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12564310
ENDOSCOPE AND ENDOSCOPE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12544160
CONTINUUM INSTRUMENT AND SURGICAL ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539022
ARTICULATION CONTROL DEVICE AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533263
Ear Cleaning Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+27.5%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 490 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month