Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/630,051

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 09, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2023 — JP 2023-087205
Examiner
GEBREMARIAM, SAMUEL A
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Renesas Electronics Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
708 granted / 850 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 11-20 in the reply filed on 8/26/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The limitation “a plurality of second trenches” as recited in line 10 of claim 6, a plurality of the second trenches” as recited in lines 5, 8 and 12 of claim 10, and “the plurality of second trenches as recited in line 8 of claim 11 are unclear whether these limitations are related to the “second trench” in claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 are allowed. Reason for indicating Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not teach or suggest, singularly or in combination at least the limitation “a first gate electrode formed at an upper portion of the first trench inside the first trench and electrically isolated from the semiconductor substrate and the field plate electrode; a second trench formed in the semiconductor substrate so as to reach a predetermined depth from the upper surface of the semiconductor substrate; and a second gate electrode formed inside the second trench and electrically isolated from the semiconductor substrate, wherein a depth of the first trench is greater than a depth of the second trench; wherein the first trench extends in a first direction in plan view; wherein the second trench extends in a second direction intersecting the first direction in plan view; wherein the first trench and the second trench communicate with each other; and wherein the first gate electrode and the second gate electrode are integrated with each other” as recited in claim 1 is the major difference between the prior art and the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL A GEBREMARIAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1653. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL A GEBREMARIAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772750
OPTIMIZED PHASE CHANGE MEMORY STRUCTURE TO IMPROVE NUCLEATION TIME VARIATION
4y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772591
BOND STRUCTURES HAVING SHIELDING STRUCTURES FOR STACKED CHIPS
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759867
MEMS Structure with Reduced Peeling and Methods Forming the Same
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765205
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753067
MEMS STRUCTURE INCLUDING A BURIED CAVITY WITH ANTISTICTION PROTUBERANCES, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month