Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/630,682

Rapid Aiming Device and Method for Use on Gun or Other Projectile Firing Device

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 09, 2024
Examiner
CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
538 granted / 779 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
821
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 779 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-11, and species a, the recognizable site being a triangle is acknowledged. Applicant contends that claims 1 and 2 read on the elected species; after further understanding it appears however that claims 3-8 also read on the elected invention and that “species b” was not actually a separate species but further limitation of the recognizable shape being a triangle (Fig. 4 appears to show the triangle with the front and rear sights aligned, both the front and rear sight separately having five (or more) visual boundaries but when aligned for a triangular shape) and claims 5-8 are generic despite the visual shape. Hence claims 9-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/10/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Nasef (US 6,711,846). Nasef discloses an aiming device for a firearm, comprising: a front sight (30); and a rear sight (20), wherein: at least one point or surface of alignment on the front sight is visually aligned with a corresponding point or surface of alignment on rear sight; the rear sight is designed in such a way as to complete the partial shape of front sight, so that when viewed together in alignment, the front sight and the rear sight form a recognizable shape; and the front sight visually protrudes above the rear sight when sights are directly aligned with aimer’s eye (Fig. 4c). 2. The aiming device for a firearm of claim 1, wherein the recognizable shape is substantially a triangle. (Fig. 4c) 3. The aiming device for a firearm of claim 1, wherein the front sight has five clearly defined external visual boundaries. (Fig. 4b) 4. The aiming device for a firearm of claim 1, wherein the rear sight has five or more clearly defined external visual boundaries. (Fig. 4a) 5. The aiming device for a firearm of claim 1, further comprising a visual surface on the rear sight. (Figs. 4a, 9, 10) 8. The aiming device for a firearm of claim 5, wherein the visual surface is painted or otherwise colored. (col. 3, lines 25-61) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nasef as applied to claims 1 and 5 above and further in view of Fisher et al. (US 5,359,800). Nasef discloses the claimed invention but doesn’t expressly disclose the visual surface includes a brightly colored replaceable insert wherein the insert is glued into place, however Fisher et al. does. Fisher et al. teaches an aiming device for a firearm comprising a visual surface on a rear sight wherein the visual surface includes a brightly colored replaceable insert (26, 28) that is glued into place (col. 24, lines 24-65). All the claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded the predictable results of allowing the sights to be easily seen in both daylight and night time and there would have been a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE CLEMENT whose telephone number is (571)272-6884. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571.272.6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE CLEMENT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2024
Application Filed
May 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12553687
WEAPON SIGHT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546569
LOW PROFILE RAIL MOUNT FOR FIREARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546570
FIREARM OPTICS MOUNT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12540789
Firearm Receiver Cover and Closure Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12540795
MODULAR SCOPE MOUNTING SYSTEM WITH SERRATED INTERFACES FOR MOUNTING COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month