Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/631,077

COMMUNICATING HEALTH INFORMATION OF A POWER STAGE IN A MULTI-PHASE SWITCHING CONVERTER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 10, 2024
Examiner
BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shaoxing Yuanfang Semiconductor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
913 granted / 1150 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1187
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1150 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment In the reply filed 3/9/26, Applicant requested an interview if the reply did not place the application in condition for allowance. However, Examiner could not find an attorney of record listed for the application and notes it is not permitted to discuss the file wrapper with someone not listed as an attorney of record. Correction to Prior Indication of Allowable Subject Matter The previous office action dated 1/6/2026 incorrectly stated the reasons for indicating allowable subject matter for claim 15, and should have instead referenced claim 16. Additionally, the reasons for indicating allowable subject matter for claim 9, incorrectly listed claim 8 and omitted subject matter from claim 9. The corrected reasons for allowance are provided below. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/9/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues there is no disclosure in Archibald that the decay status indicator is determined in the alleged active state. Examiner respectfully disagrees as TD3, shown in Figure 4, occurs during the active state when the power stage is operated as a boost converter to reverse the current (see Figure 4 IIN) back to the power source. Applicant states there is no disclosure in Archibald for “wherein said power stage records said set of bits when said power stage is in said active state in response to said first signal being drive to said first state, wherein said power stage transmits said set of bits to said phase controller on a first path after said first signal is driven to said second state from said first state”. The power stage responds to the status requests after the transition to the inactive state (paragraph 35). The rejection of claim 1 has been maintained below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Archibald (US 2023/0179099) in view of Slepchenkov (US 2021/0316637). With respect to claim 1, Archibald discloses a multi-phase switching converter (Fig. 2 30) comprising: a power stage (Fig. 2 Power Stage 1) to record at least one parameter (Fig. 5 62) representing internal health information in the form of a memory (Fig. 6 126); and a phase controller (Fig. 2 42) to control a plurality of power stages (Fig. 2 31) including said power stage to cause said plurality of power stages to together generate a regulated power supply (Fig. 2 VOUT), said phase controller driving a first signal (Fig. 5 52) to a first state (Fig. 4 active from start of TD1 to end of TD3) and then a second state (Fig. 4 inactive after TD3) to cause said power stage to be in an active state and an inactive state respectively, wherein said power stage records said set of bits when said power stage is in said active state (Fig. 5 61) in response to said first signal being driven to said first state, wherein said power stage transmits said at least one bit (paragraphs 33-34, reports the decays status indicator as part of reporting requirement) to said phase controller on a first path (paragraphs 33-34, the communication channel on which the status is reported is not specified) after (Fig. 5 66) said first signal is driven to said second state from said first state (Fig. 4 Status reported after TD3). Archibald discloses recording and transmitting at least one parameter representing internal health information, but does not require recording and transmitting in the form of a set of a plurality of bits. Slepchenkov discloses transmitting status information from a power stage (Fig. 1A 108-1) on a path (Fig. 1A 106-1) to a phase controller (Fig. 1A 102) wherein the status information represents internal health information (paragraph 80-82). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a power stage to record parameters representing internal health information in the form of a set of bits, and wherein said power stage transmits said set of bits to said phase controller on a first path after said first signal is driven to said second state from said first state, in order to enhance the control and the reporting of the status of the power stage. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With respect to claim 2, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, primarily, a power stage to record parameters representing internal health information in the form of a set of bits; wherein said power stage transmits said set of bits to said phase controller on a first path after said first signal is driven to said first state, and, wherein said power stage comprises: a high-side switch and a low-side switch to respectively drive an inductor in a first interval and a second interval periodically based on a control signal received from said phase controller, wherein a magnitude of current flowing through said inductor is determined by ON durations of said high-side switch and said low-side switch as set by said control signal, wherein said power stage measures said magnitude and transmits information representing said magnitude on said first path when in said active state. With respect to claim 9, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, primarily, a power stage comprising: a high-side switch and a low-side switch to respectively drive an inductor in a first interval and a second interval periodically based on a control signal received from a phase controller, wherein a magnitude of inductor-current flowing through said inductor is determined by ON durations of said high-side switch and said low-side switch as set by said control signal, and a fault communication block to record parameters representing internal health information in the form of a set of bits, wherein said fault communication block transmits said set of bits to said phase controller on a first path after said first signal is driven to said first state, and a current-sense block to measure said magnitude of said inductor-current, said current sense-sense block to transmit information representing said magnitude on said first path when said power stage is in said active state. With respect to claim 16, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, primarily, wherein said power stage is designed to record parameters representing internal health information in the form of a set of bits, and an input interface to receive said set of bits on a first path when said power stage transmits said set of bits to said phase controller on said first path after said first signal is driven to said first state, wherein said power stage completes entering a shutdown mode after completion of transmission of said set of bits in response to said first signal being driven to said first state, wherein said power stage transmits said set of bits according to a protocol, wherein said protocol comprises: driving said first path to a first voltage level to signal a logic 1 for a bit; driving said first path to a second voltage level to signal a logic 0 for a bit; and driving said first path to a third voltage level to signal a boundary between a consecutive pair of bits. The aforementioned limitations in combination with all remaining limitations of the respective claims are believed to render the aforementioned indicated claim and any dependent claims thereof patentable over the art of record. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY RAYMOND BEHM whose telephone number is (571)272-8929. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY R BEHM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601768
MONITORING ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM HAVING A MONITORING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587102
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH OPTIMIZED AVAILABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567814
Method and Device for Calibrating a Time Base Signal in a Photovoltaic Inverter
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567733
FAULT PROTECTION APPARATUS AND PHOTOVOLTAIC INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562564
REDUCING INRUSH CURRENT TO A CAPACITOR BANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1150 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month