Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/631,551

OPTICAL SWITCHING UNIT WITH FREQUENCY SELECTIVE PROTECTION MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 10, 2024
Examiner
BROCK, PAUL MORGAN
Art Unit
2634
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-62.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
19
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9, 11-14, 16-18, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hu (US 20190158940 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Hu teaches A method, comprising: receiving a first wave division multiplexed (WDM) optical signal at a first receive port of an optical protection switching module ([0004], “working path”; FIG. 3: 319-1); receiving a second WDM optical signal at a second receive port of the optical protection switching module ([004], “protection path”; FIG. 3: 319-2); tapping off a portion of the first WDM optical signal to obtain a tapped portion of the first WDM optical signal (FIG. 3: 319-1, 323-1); optically filtering the tapped portion of the first WDM optical signal to obtain a predetermined channel of the tapped portion of the first WDM optical signal (Id.); detecting a power level of the predetermined channel ([0004], “The OCM sweeps through each channel of the WDM signal and provides an optical power level measurement for each channel”; FIG. 3: 352; [0053]); and in response to the power level being below a predetermined threshold, causing a switch to enable the second WDM optical signal to pass through the optical protection switching module. ([0004], “if the power level measurement for the working path is lower than the power level measurement for the protection path… then the WDM switch may route the WDM signal through the protection path”; FIG. 3, 314) Regarding Claim 2, Hu teaches The method of claim 1, wherein the optical protection switching module includes a transmit section and a receive section. (FIG. 3: 319, 301) Regarding Claim 3, Hu teaches The method of claim 2, wherein the method is performed in the receive section of the optical protection switching module. (FIG. 3: 300) Regarding Claim 5, Hu teaches The method of claim 1, further comprising performing the detecting with a photo detector. ([0037-0038]; FIG. 2: 216) Regarding Claim 6, Hu teaches The method of claim 1, wherein the first receive port is one of a working receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-1) and a protection receiving port, (FIG. 3: 319-2) and the method further comprises causing the switch to enable optical connectivity between the protection receiving port and an output of the optical protection switching module. (FIG. 3: 314) Regarding Claim 7, Hu teaches The method of claim 1, further comprising: tapping off a portion of the second WDM optical signal to obtain a tapped portion of the second WDM optical signal (FIG. 3: 319-2, 323-2); optically filtering the tapped portion of the second WDM optical signal to obtain the predetermined channel of the tapped portion of the second WDM optical signal (FIG. 3: 319-2, 323-2; [0053]); and communicating a result of the detecting to switch logic of the optical protection switching module. ([0052] (teaching a switch logic for the protection module); (FIG. 3: 318)). Regarding Claim 8, Hu teaches The method of claim 7, further comprising causing the switch to enable the first WDM optical signal to pass through the optical protection switching module. (FIG. 3: 314) Regarding Claim 9, Hu teaches The method of claim 7, wherein optically filtering the tapped portion of the second WDM optical signal is performed by another optical filter. (FIG. 3: 319-2) Regarding Claim 11, Hu teaches A device comprising: a first optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-1); a second optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-2); an optical switch having respective inputs connected to the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 314); an optical output port connected to an output of the optical switch (FIG. 3: 301-1); switching logic configured to control which of the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port is connected to the optical output port ([0052]; FIG. 3: 318); a first optical filter, tuned to a predetermined channel, in communication with the first optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-1); and a first photo detector in communication with an output of the first optical filter ([0037-0038]; FIG. 2: 216; FIG. 3: 323-1), wherein the switching logic, in response to an output of the first photo detector, is configured to cause the optical switch to enable one of the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port to be optically connected to the output of the optical switch ([0052-0053]). Regarding Claim 12, Hu teaches The device of claim 11, wherein the device is an optical protection switching module. (FIG. 3: 300; [0004]) Regarding Claim 13, Hu teaches The device of claim 12, wherein the optical protection switching module comprises a transmit section and a receive section. (FIG. 3: 319-1, 301-1) Regarding Claim 14, Hu teaches The device of claim 11, wherein the predetermined channel is a selected channel from a wave division multiplexed (WDM) optical signal. (FIG. 3: 319-1, 323-1; [0004] (“The OCM sweeps through each channel of the WDM signal and provides an optical power level measurement for each channel”)) Regarding Claim 16, Hu teaches The device of claim 11, further comprising: a second optical filter (FIG. 319-2:), tuned to the predetermined channel (Id.), in communication with the second optical receiving port (Id.); and a second photo detector in communication with an output of the second optical filter ([0037-0038]; FIG. 2: 216), wherein an output of the second photo detector is in communication with the switching logic. (FIG. 3: 323-2). Regarding Claim 17, Hu teaches A system comprising: a working optical path ([0004], “working path”; FIG. 3: 319-1); a protection optical path ([004], “protection path”; FIG. 3: 319-2); and an optical protection switching module configured to enable communication via one of the working optical path and the protection optical path (FIG. 3: 300), the optical protection switching module comprising: a first optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-1); a second optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 319-2); an optical switch having respective inputs connected to the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port (FIG. 3: 314); an optical output port connected to an output of the optical switch (FIG. 3: 301-1); switching logic configured to control which of the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port is connected to the optical output port; ([0052]; FIG. 3: 318) a first optical filter (FIG. 3: 319-1), tuned to a predetermined channel of a wave division multiplexed (WDM) optical signal (Id.), in communication with the first optical receiving port (Id.); and a first photo detector in communication with an output of the first optical filter. ([0037-0038]; FIG. 2: 216; FIG. 3: 323-1) Regarding Claim 18, Hu teaches The system of claim 17, wherein the switching logic, in response to an output of the first photo detector, is configured to cause the optical switch to enable one of the first optical receiving port and the second optical receiving port to be optically connected to the output of the optical switch. ([0053]; FIG. 3: 319-2) Regarding Claim 20, Hu teaches The system of claim 17, further comprising: a second optical filter (FIG. 3: 319-2), tuned to the predetermined channel (Id.), in communication with the second optical receiving port (Id.); and a second photo detector in communication with an output of the second optical filter ([0037-0038]; FIG. 2: 216; FIG. 3: 323-2), wherein an output of the second photo detector is in communication with the switching logic. (FIG. 3: 323-2, 352, 318) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 10, 15, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hu (US 20190158940 A1) in light of Way (US 20190165877 A1). Regarding Claim 4, Hu teaches The method of claim 1, Hu does not teach wherein the optically filtering is performed using a tunable optical filter. Way teaches wherein the optically filtering is performed using a tunable optical filter. ([0009]) Hu and Way both relate to using ROADMs in optical networks and are therefore analogous art to each other. Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the ROADM in Hu with the tunable ROADM taught in Way. The suggestion/motivation would have been to allow the ROADM in Hu to adjust and capture different wavelengths for monitoring — introducing greater flexibility in the protection system taught in Hu. Regarding Claim 10, Hu teaches The method of claim 9, Hu does not teach wherein the another optical filter is a tunable optical filter. Way teaches wherein the another optical filter is a tunable optical filter. ([0009]) Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the ROADM in Hu with the tunable ROADM taught in Way. The suggestion/motivation would have been to allow the ROADM in Hu to adjust and capture different wavelengths for monitoring — introducing greater flexibility in the protection system taught in Hu. Regarding Claim 15, Hu teaches The device of claim 11, Hu does not teach wherein the first optical filter is a tunable optical filter. Way teaches wherein the first optical filter is a tunable optical filter. ([0009]) Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the ROADM in Hu with the tunable ROADM taught in Way. The suggestion/motivation would have been to allow the ROADM in Hu to adjust and capture different wavelengths for monitoring — introducing greater flexibility in the protection system taught in Hu. Regarding Claim 19, Hu teaches The system of claim 17, Hu does not teach wherein the first optical filter is a tunable optical filter. Way teaches wherein the first optical filter is a tunable optical filter. ([0009]) Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the ROADM in Hu with the tunable ROADM taught in Way. The suggestion/motivation would have been to allow the ROADM in Hu to adjust and capture different wavelengths for monitoring — introducing greater flexibility in the protection system taught in Hu. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL M BROCK whose telephone number is (571)272-7257. The examiner can normally be reached 8-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Vanderpuye can be reached at (571) 272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL MORGAN BROCK/Examiner, Art Unit 2634 February 3, 2026 /KENNETH N VANDERPUYE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month