Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/631,741

HIGH EFFICIENCY REGULATED HYBRID CONVERTER WITH MULTIPLE CAPACITIVE CURRENT CARRYING BRANCHES

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 10, 2024
Examiner
LAXTON, GARY L
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Renesas Design (Uk) Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
957 granted / 1107 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1129
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1107 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/05/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues the cited prior art references do not provide two or more voltage rails. The examiner disagrees. Salem provides plenty of “voltage rails”, see the illustration below: PNG media_image1.png 504 942 media_image1.png Greyscale Petersen also illustrates several voltage rails. PNG media_image2.png 580 832 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 580 878 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 11, 12, 20 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1/a2 as being anticipated by Petersen (US 10790742 – IDS). Claim 1; Petersen discloses a power converter configured to receive an input voltage (Vin) via a voltage input port (202) and output a predetermined output voltage (Vout) via a voltage output port (204), comprising: two voltage rail provision cells (C1, C2) connected between the voltage input port (202) and ground (gnd); a switch network (e.g. S1-S8) comprising a plurality of switches, configured to create a current path through the two voltage rail provision cells such that the two voltage rail provision cells provide two more voltage rails (i.e. multilevel) each corresponding to a predetermined input to output voltage difference; at least one power storage cell (L) connected between the two more voltage rail provision cells and the voltage output port (Vout), wherein the at least one power storage cell is configured to output the predetermined output voltage to the voltage output port (204); a control circuit configured to control the switch network to select at least one voltage rail of the two voltage rails to set the predetermined output voltage. Claim 2 the two voltage rail provision cells are two capacitor cells. Claim 3; the at least one power storage cell is an inductor cell. Claim 4; each of the two voltage rails is provided by two capacitor cells. Claim 5; the switch network creates the current path through the two voltage rail provision cells by switching each of the voltage rail provision cells to be connected to ground (i.e. switch S4 for C1 and switch S8 for C2) or the voltage output port (S3 connects C1 to 204 and S7 connects C2 to Vout); wherein each voltage rail provision cell is switchably connected to ground and the voltage output port (e.g. S4, S8, S3, S7). S1 and S5 would connect the rail to 204 through L. S1, C1, S3 connects to Vout. S5, C2, S7 connects to Vout. Etc. Claim 6; the selected voltage rail is connected to provide the predetermined output voltage via the power storage cell. Claim 8; each capacitor cell comprises: a capacitor; and at least one capacitor connecting switch (S1-S8) of the switch network, wherein the at least one capacitor connecting switch connects the capacitor to one of the two voltage rails. Claims 11 and 12; the control circuit controls the switch network to operate in a first mode (turn switches ON) in a first phase (to connect, to charge) and a second mode (turn switches OFF) in a second phase (to disconnect, to discharge). Claim 20; the two capacitor cells are connected to each other by a first plurality of switches of the switch network (S2, S3, S6, S7). Claim 21; the two capacitor cells are distributed on either side of the inductor cell such that a same number of capacitor cells are positioned on a left side and a right side of the inductor cell (C1, left of L, C2 right of L). Claim 23; a method of setting an output voltage using a power converter configured to receive an input voltage (Vin) via a voltage input port and output a predetermined output voltage (Vout) via a voltage output port, the power converter comprising two voltage rails (e.g. multilevel), the method comprising: controlling, by a control circuit, a switch network comprising a plurality of switches (S1-S8) to create a current path through two voltage rail provision cells (e.g. C1, C2) such that the two voltage rail provision cells provide two voltage rails, wherein each voltage rail corresponds to a predetermined input to output voltage difference, and wherein each voltage rail provision cell is connected between the voltage input port (Vin) and ground (Vout); selecting, by the control circuit, at least one voltage rail of the two voltage rails to set a predetermined output voltage (vout); outputting, by a power storage cell (L) connected between the two voltage rail provision cells (C1, C2) and a voltage output port (204), the predetermined output voltage to the voltage output port. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-7, 9, 11, 12, 20 and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1/a2 as being anticipated by Salem (US 20140184189). Claims 1 and 2; Salem disclose a power converter configured to receive an input voltage (Vin) via a voltage input port (306/310) and output a predetermined output voltage (Vout) via a voltage output port, comprising: two more voltage rail provision cells (312, 314) connected between the voltage input port and ground (310); a switch network comprising a plurality of switches (e.g. 316, 620, 326, 330), configured to create a current path through the two voltage rail provision cells such that the two voltage rail provision cells provide two voltage rails (e.g. see figs. 3C, 3E) each corresponding to a predetermined input to output voltage difference; at least one power storage cell (capacitor at 308) connected between the two voltage rail provision cells and the voltage output port (Vout), wherein the at least one power storage cell is configured to output the predetermined output voltage to the voltage output port; a control circuit configured to control the switch network to select at least one voltage rail of the two voltage rails to set the predetermined output voltage (e.g. fig. 3B). Claim 5; the switch network creates the current path through the two voltage rail provision cells by switching each of the voltage rail provision cells to be connected to ground or the voltage output port; wherein each voltage rail provision cell is switchably connected to ground and the voltage output port (see figs 3C/3E). Claim 6; the selected voltage rail is connected o provide the predetermined output voltage via the power storage cell (at 308). Claim 7; an additional voltage rail is added by connecting two additional voltage rail provision cells (e.g. fig. 7D). Claim 9; Salem disclose the switched circuit utilizes parasitic inductors to provide continuous transformation ratios. Claim 11; the control circuit controls the switch network to operate in a first mode (turn switches ON) in a first phase (to connect, to charge) and a second mode (turn switches OFF) in a second phase (to disconnect, to discharge). Claim 12; the control circuit controls the switch network to alternate between the first mode and the second mode (charging/discharging). Claim 20; the two capacitor cells are connected to each other by a first plurality of switches of the switch network (316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, etc.). Claim 23; a method of setting an output voltage using a power converter configured to receive an input voltage (Vin) via a voltage input port and output a predetermined output voltage (Vout) via a voltage output port, the power converter comprising two voltage rails (312, 314), the method comprising: controlling, by control circuit, a switch network comprising a plurality of switches (316, 318, 320, 322, 324, 326, 328, 330, etc.) to create a current path through two voltage rail provision cells such that the two voltage rail provision cells provide two voltage rails (e.g. figs 3C, 3E), wherein each voltage rail corresponds to a predetermined input to output voltage difference, and wherein each voltage rail provision cell is connected between the voltage input port (+) and ground (-); selecting, by the control circuit, at least one voltage rail of the two or more voltage rails to set a predetermined output voltage; outputting, by a power storage cell (capacitor at 308) connected between the voltage rail provision cells and a voltage output port (308), the predetermined output voltage to the voltage output port (Vout). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Petersen. Claim 22; Petersen disclose the claimed subject matter in regards to claim 3 supra, excerpt for the power converter comprises six capacitor cells. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Petersen to include six capacitor cells, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. V. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to modify Petersen to include six capacitor cells order to increase the conversion ratio. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 13-19 are still objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20080055946 Lesso et al. disclose a converter with first and second output voltages. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY L LAXTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2079. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8 am-4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Crystal Hammond can be reached at 571-270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY L LAXTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838 7/01/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706547
Coupled Inductors Inverter Topology
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700815
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GRID FORMING CONTROL
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699412
REFERENCE VOLTAGE CIRCUIT AND ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689307
MEDIUM-VOLTAGE POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM AND DISTRIBUTED MEDIUM-VOLTAGE POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687809
POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month