Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/633,135

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF METAL ALLOYS AND METAL ALLOY MATRIX COMPOSITES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Priority
Mar 17, 2015 — provisional 62/134,190 +3 more
Examiner
WU, JENNY R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Elementum 3D Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
544 granted / 858 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
895
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 858 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-3 are pending and are examined. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 01/27/2025 and is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Interpretation Instant claim 1 required “for use in a laser powder bed furoin additive manufacturing process” is intended use and preamble according to MPEP 2111.02 II. Because the preamble merely states the purpose or intended use of the invention, rather than a claim limitation, no patentable weight would be given. See MPEP 2111.02 II Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "said metal alloy powder blend" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim as independent claim 1 recites a metal alloy powder, not metal alloy powder blend. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Saveker (US20100068087A1). As for claims 1-3, Saveker discloses in Example 1 ([0040]), a metal matrix composite (i.e. claimed metal alloy powder ) which is a mixture of aluminum alloy powder (i.e. claimed metal alloy particles) and SiC powder (i.e. claimed nucleant material). Mean (d50) particle size of the aluminum powder is 30 microns ([0040] line 5), which supports instant claim 1 required D50 particle size of 5-150 microns. SiC acts as heterogeneous nucleation sites, hence it is expected to lower the energy of nucleation of aluminum alloy powder. The metal matrix composite is used in powder metallurgy ([0002]). Hence, it is fully capable for use in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process as claimed. SiC powder has a D50 particle size of 12.8 micron ([0040] line 6), which supports instant claim 2 required D50 particle size of 5-150 microns. The proportion of SiC is equivalent to 25% by volume ([0040] line 7), which supports instant claim 3 required 0.1-35% vol. Claim(s) 1- 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lin (US20170120386A1 which has provisional application filed on 03/12/2015). As for claims 1-3, Lin discloses an aluminum-based product formed from a powder. The powder is used as precursor material in a laser powder bed fusion([0014]) additive manufacturing process.. Hence, the powder reads on claimed metal alloy powder comprising a mixture of aluminum alloy matrix and ceramic reinforcement phase such as TiB2. (Figures 3a-3f and [0067]) Ceramic reinforcement phase of TiB2 reads on claimed nucleant material, which is expected to lower the energy of nucleation of the aluminum alloy matrix. The aluminum alloy matrix reads on claimed metal alloy particles since the matrix is in particle form. The median (D50) size of the powder is 48.81 microns [0069], which reads on instant claim 1 required metal alloy particle having a D50 particle size of 5-150 microns. The ceramic particles is 1-30 vol% of the powder (claim 1), which is within instant claim 3 required 0.1-35 vol%. Since the ceramic reinforcement phase is dispersed within the aluminum alloy matrix, it is also in a form of powder, which reads on instant claim 2 required powder, the median (D50) size of the powder reads on instant claim 2 required wherein clause. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNY R WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5515. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Hendricks can be reached on (571)272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNY R WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700527
Undercooling Solidification Method for Preparing Amorphous OR Nanocrystalline Soft Magnetic Alloy with High Fe Content
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686900
FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL HAVING IMPROVED CORROSION RESISTANCE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686906
HIGH-STRENGTH AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL WITH IMPROVED LOW-TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS IN HYDROGEN ENVIRONMENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673368
ADAPTIVE PATH FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING USING A LASER SOURCE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676253
ANISOTROPIC RARE EARTH SINTERED MAGNET AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+16.2%)
3y 1m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 858 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month