Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/633,262

TOY THAT CAN TRAVEL AND CAN GENERATE SUCTION

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Examiner
HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Spin Master Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
498 granted / 1067 resolved
-23.3% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1067 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: In lines 4-5 the limitation “wherein the first primary drive wheel is disposed on a first lateral side of the chassis” should be omitted since it is redundant. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 13 and 14 both disclose that the first motor has a portion on each side of a longitudinal axis of the chassis but the independent claim from which these claims depend discloses that the first motor is disposed on a first lateral side of the chassis relative to the longitudinal axis and as such it is unclear how the motor can both be to one side of the longitudinal axis but also have portions on each side of the longitudinal axis and as such the scope of the claim is unascertainable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Clark Jr. (7980916), Baggott (2510791) and Sauer (2539330). Clark Jr. discloses a rolling suction-generating toy (abstract, Fig. 17) having a chassis (158) with a bottom surface that includes at least one opening (158d), a motorized fan element (150, 152) that is fluidly coupled to the opening for drawing air into the at least one opening for producing a low pressure region (Figs. 18-19), a first forward drive assembly disposed on a first longitudinal half of the chassis defined by a lateral axis that passes through a center of gravity of the toy and a second rearward drive assembly disposed on a second longitudinal half opposite the first half (Fig. 17). The first drive assembly includes a first primary drive wheel (166) rotatably coupled to a first drive motor (164), wherein the first drive wheel and first motor are arranged on a first lateral side of the chassis relative to a longitudinal axis of the chassis that passes through the center of gravity of the toy (Fig. 17). The second drive assembly includes a second primary drive wheel (166) rotatably coupled to a second drive motor (164), wherein the second drive wheel and second motor are arranged on a second lateral side of the chassis opposite the first lateral side relative to the longitudinal axis (Fig. 17). The first and second drive wheels are each positioned to engage a surface for propelling the suction-generating toy along the surface and are longitudinally spaced apart from each other (Figs. 17-19). The first and second drive motors each drive respective first and second output shafts for driving the respective first and second primary wheels through respective gear arrangements (Fig. 17). Clark Jr. discloses the basic inventive concept with the exception of the toy including first and second limb elements and the first and second drive assemblies further including first and second auxiliary wheels with linkages for pivoting the respective limb elements. Baggott discloses a rolling toy with a chassis (10) having a first forward drive assembly and a first pivotal limb assembly (20) positioned on a first lateral half of the chassis relative to a lateral axis of the chassis and a second rearward drive assembly and a second pivotal limb assembly (28) positioned on a second lateral half of the chassis opposite the first (Figs. 1 & 2). The first drive assembly includes a drive wheel (14) and an auxiliary wheel (14) arranged on opposite sides of an output shaft (13) for positioning on respective first and second lateral sides of the chassis relative to a longitudinal axis of the chassis (Fig. 1). The first drive assembly is further configured to pivotally rotate the first limb assembly (20) for movement between first and second rotational positions (Figs. 1 & 3). The second drive assembly includes a drive wheel (23) and an auxiliary wheel (23) arranged on opposite sides of an output shaft (22) for positioning on respective first and second lateral sides of the chassis relative to a longitudinal axis of the chassis (Fig. 1). The second drive assembly is further configured to pivotally rotate the second limb assembly (28) for movement between third and fourth rotational positions (Figs. 1 & 3). Since both Clark Jr. and Baggott disclose rolling toys, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Clark Jr. to include opposing auxiliary wheels to the primary drive wheels of each of the first and second drive assemblies and configure the drive assemblies for pivoting first and second limb elements as taught by Baggott for the predictable result of providing enhanced entertainment value to the toy by creating a more dynamic toy with increased visual interest as it travels over a surface. Sauer discloses a rolling toy (Figs. 1-3) having first (15) and second (18) pivotal limb elements coupled (14, 17) to a chassis (11) and movable between rotational positions by respective wheel and linkage assemblies. A first linkage element (23) has a first end pivotally connected to an eccentric pin portion (26’) of a first auxiliary wheel (22) on a first lateral side of the chassis for movement through a first path of motion in response to rotation of the first auxiliary wheel and a second end coupled to the first limb element (Figs. 1-3). A second linkage element (24) has a first end pivotally connected to an eccentric pin portion (26’) of a second auxiliary wheel (22) on a second lateral side of the chassis for movement through a second path of motion in response to rotation of the second auxiliary wheel and a second end coupled to the second limb element (Figs. 1-3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the first and second drive assemblies of Clark Jr. and Baggott to have the first and second limb elements actuated by linkages connected between the respective limb elements and auxiliary wheels as taught by Sauer for the predictable result of substituting one movement mechanism for another that achieves the same result of actuating the limb elements to rotate as the toy rolls to provide interesting animation effects in a simplified manner. The combination of references creates a toy wherein the first primary drive wheel and first auxiliary wheel are rotatably coupled to the first motor on opposite sides of the chassis and gear assembly by an output shaft and the second primary drive wheel and second auxiliary wheel are rotatably coupled to the second motor on opposite sides of the chassis and gear assembly by an output shaft such that the first primary drive wheel and the second auxiliary wheel are situated on the same lateral side of the chassis and the second primary drive wheel and the first auxiliary wheel are situated on the same lateral side of the chassis for balancing a weight distribution. Claim(s) 13 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Clark Jr., Baggott and Sauer as applied above. The references disclose the basic inventive concept, with the exception of the first motor having a portion on a first side of the longitudinal axis and a portion on a second side of the longitudinal axis. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to position the first motor so as to have a portion on each side of the longitudinal axis since such a modification would have involved a mere rearrangement of parts and a rearrangement of parts has been held to be obvious unless a new or unexpected result is produced. See In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See 10384140, 8371898 and GB2439526A. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALYSSA HYLINSKI whose telephone number is (571)272-2684. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:30 - 6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.M.H/Examiner, Art Unit 3711 /EUGENE L KIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12569779
BUBBLE-BLOWING TOY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551813
Modular Block System
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544683
DRAG RACING STABILITY MANAGEMENT FOR A MODEL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528023
COMBINATION ARTICLES OF ENTERTAINMENT COMPRISING COMPLEMENTARY ACTION FIGURE AND RECONFIGURABLE CASE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12496532
REMOVABLE STRUCTURE OF SIMULATED APPEARANCE OF MUZZLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+30.7%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1067 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month