Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/633,497

METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Priority
Oct 12, 2021 — CN 202111184690.7 +1 more
Examiner
GOODWIN, SCHQUITA D
Art Unit
2459
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
220 granted / 330 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
355
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.3%
+12.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 330 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. DETAILED ACTION This communication is in response to Application No. 18/633,497 filed on 11 April 2024. This application claims CON to PCT/CN2022/124564 filed on 11 October 2022 and claims FOR priority to CN202111184690.7 filed on 12 October 2021. The response filed 7 July 2026 amends claims 1-6 and 14-19, withdraws claims 8-22, and presents arguments. Claims 1-7 and 14-20 are presented for examination. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 15, 16, 19, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 17 and 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites the limitations "a fourth condition" and "a fifth condition." Claim 14 fails to disclose a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition. Thus, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This claim is indefinite. For the purpose of this examination, Examiner will interpret this imitation to mean “the method according to claim 16,” wherein claim 16 recites a third condition. Claim 18 fails to cure the deficiencies of their parent claim(s) and, therefore, inherit the rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2019096266 A1 to Liu et al and in view of US PGPUB 2023/0057169 A1 to Li et al. Regarding Claim 1, Liu discloses a first node for wireless communications (FIG. 1, terminal device), comprising: a first receiver, receiving N CSI configuration information, the N CSI configuration information being respectively used to determine N CSI reportings, the N CSI reportings not occupying a first-type processing unit and a second-type processing unit before a first symbol, N being a positive integer greater than 1 (“Detailed Ways” section, paragraph 73 states that the technical solution includes a UE of a cell that receives CSI report configuration); and a first transmitter, operatively coupled to the first receiver and the first processor, the first transmitter transmitting a first information block, the first information block comprising at least one CSI reporting of the N CSI reportings (“Summary of the Invention” section, paragraph 37 states “the terminal device reports the CSI according to the Z”). Liu doesn’t explicitly disclose a first processor, operatively coupled to the first receiver, the first processor updating a CSI reporting in a first CSI reporting subset, the first CSI reporting subset being a subset of the N CSI reportings; and wherein any one of the N CSI reportings is a Type I CSI reporting or a Type II CSI reporting; any Type I CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings corresponds to a first-type integer, and any Type II CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings corresponds to a second-type integer; any Type I CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings, if updated, does not occupy the second-type processing unit and occupies a number of the first-type processing units equal to the corresponding first-type integer; any Type II CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings, if updated occupies a number of the second-type processing units equal to the corresponding second-type integer; the first node determines on its own whether to update a CSI reporting not belonging to the first CSI reporting subset in the N CSI reportings; the N CSI reportings respectively correspond to N priorities, and the N CSI reportings are sequentially arranged according to corresponding priorities in a descending order; the N priorities are used to determine a number of CSI reportings comprised in the first CSI reporting subset. Li, in a similar field of endeavor, discloses a first processor, operatively coupled to the first receiver, the first processor updating a CSI reporting in a first CSI reporting subset, the first CSI reporting subset being a subset of the N CSI reportings (FIG. 2 and 0110 provides for UE 115 updates a type of CSI report based on identifying a type of reports, wherein one of two types is a subset); and wherein any one of the N CSI reportings is a Type I CSI reporting or a Type II CSI reporting (FIG. 4B and 0127 provides for one of Type I 405-b and Type II 410-b); any Type I CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings corresponds to a first-type integer, and any Type II CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings corresponds to a second-type integer (0127 provides for Type I CSI report occupy 2 CPUs and the Type II reporting is 4 CPUs); any Type I CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings, if updated, does not occupy the second-type processing unit and occupies a number of the first-type processing units equal to the corresponding first-type integer (0127 provides for Type II CSI reporting is skipped/updated later due to Type I occupancy); any Type II CSI reporting in the N CSI reportings, if updated occupies a number of the second-type processing units equal to the corresponding second-type integer (0127 provides for the Type II reporting is 4 CPUs); the first node determines on its own whether to update a CSI reporting not belonging to the first CSI reporting subset in the N CSI reportings (0127 provides for the Type II reporting is skipped); the N CSI reportings respectively correspond to N priorities, and the N CSI reportings are sequentially arranged according to corresponding priorities in a descending order (0127 provides for the Type I CSI report 405-b may have a higher priority than the Type II CSI report 410-b, wherein 1 is sequentially arranged and 2 is a second priority in descending order); the N priorities are used to determine a number of CSI reportings comprised in the first CSI reporting subset (0127 provides for the Type I CSI report 405-b may have a higher priority than the Type II CSI report 410-b, and Type II reportings may be skipped/updated later due to priority). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filed date of the claimed invention would have recognized the ability to utilize the teachings of Li for updating and processing CSI. The CSI processing of Liu, when implemented with the multi-type CSI reports of the Li system, will allow one of ordinary skill in the art to update CSI reportings based on type and priority in order to optimize CPU usage in a terminal device. Therefore, the examiner concludes it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to utilize the CSI processing of Liu with the multi-type CSI reports of the Li system for the desirable purpose of prioritizing the processing of CSI reports based on CPU availability. Regarding Claim 14, similar rejection where the first node of claim 1 teaches the method of claim 14. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US PGPUB 2021/0307025 A1 to Hosseini et al discloses relative prioritization of CSI reports. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCHQUITA GOODWIN whose telephone number is (571)272-5477. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia Dollinger can be reached on (571) 272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCHQUITA D GOODWIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700900
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR BEAM REPORTING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701423
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING CLUSTERS OF SECTORS IN A TELECOM NETWORK
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701043
COMMUNICATION NETWORK FAILURE DETECTION AND RESTORATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701065
In-band Edge-to-Edge Round-Trip Time Measurement
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695661
PROTOCOL ANALYZER, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM IN WHICH PROTOCOL ERROR DETECTION PROGRAM IS RECORDED, AND PROTOCOL ERROR DETECTION METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+15.1%)
3y 6m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month