Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/633,870

SWEET CORN LINE SHY-6S20-2286LN

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Examiner
LOGSDON, CHARLES
Art Unit
1662
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Seminis Vegetable Seeds Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
386 granted / 537 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
556
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 537 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-25 are pending. Claims 1-25 are examined herein. The rejection to claims 12 and 14 under 35 USC 112(a) for failure to satisfy the written description requirement is withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendments of the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 8 remains rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Applicant describes variety SHY-6S20-2286LN by its breeding history and the variety’s morphological and physiological characteristics. (Table 1 pp. 8-12). Claim 8 is directed to a plant having all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of a corn plant of the SHY-6S20-2286LN variety. It is important to note that the claim does not require the plant to share any genetic basis with SHY-6S20-2286LN and as such the claimed genus encompasses plants having any genetic composition that exhibits the morphological and physiological characteristics of the claimed variety. This point is relevant because the specification does not describe any plants outside of SHY-6S20-2286LN having the required characteristics. The morphological and physiological characteristics of such a plant are not described anywhere in the specification, except for SHY-6S20-2286LN itself. Given the breadth of the genus of plants encompassed by the claims, and the fact that the only plant that Applicant has described is that of corn variety SHY-6S20-2286LN, the instant claims are not adequately described and it is unclear whether at the time of filing Applicant was in possession of the invention as broadly claimed. Response to Remarks Applicant urges that the rejection to Claim 8 for failure to satisfy the written description requirement should be withdrawn because the claim has been amended to depend from Claim 2, which specifies that the plant for trait comparison is SHY-6S20-2286LN. (Remarks p. 7). This is not found persuasive. As set forth in the rejection, the problem is that the plant of Claim 8 is limited only by the traits that it shares with the variety that is claimed in the other claims. The plant of Claim 8 encompasses plants with no direct genetic relationship with SHY-6S20-2286LN. The genus of such plants are not described by any breeding history, genetic description or seed deposit. As such, the claimed genus cannot be deemed to be adequately described. Conclusion Claims 8 is rejected. Claims 1-7, 9-25 appear to be free of the prior art, given the failure of the prior art, to teach or reasonably suggest a sweet corn variety produced by the breeding methodology disclosed by Applicant and wherein said variety comprises all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of SHY-6S20-2286LN. The closest prior art made of record is Hellewell (US 10194622 B1) which teach a sweet corn variety having similar characteristics relative to SHY-6S20-2286LN. However, the instant variety differs from the prior art in its complete genetic background and at least in its anther color. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES A LOGSDON whose telephone number is (571)270-0282. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bratislav Stankovic can be reached at (571) 270-0305. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES LOGSDON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662683
METHODS TO EVALUATE TRAITS
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642219
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010440
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12635641
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010542
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635647
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010509
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622376
WHEAT VARIETY 6PGTV08B
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 537 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month