Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/634,011

MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT OF ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE MIXTURE SHEET AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MIXTURE SHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Examiner
SWIER, WAYNE K.
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
218 granted / 322 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
358
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.4%
+24.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 322 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I claims 1-6 in the reply filed on December 8, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 7-13 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited (GB 943,365) IDS 06/10/2025, hereinafter Sherritt Gordon, in view of Althues (US 2021/0320288 A1), IDS 04/12/2024 with evidence provided for claim 3 from S. Lee “Current Collectors in Energy Storage A Comprehensive Guide to Materials and Applications June 10, 2025 from https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/current-collectors-in-energy-storage Regarding Claim 1, Sherritt Gordon discloses a mixture sheet production apparatus (p. 1, ll. 10-21, ll. 59-68 compacted products including metal and non-metal compounds and mixtures thereof; forming compactible particulate matter into useful shapes mixtures to form a green sheet), which comprises; a stacking mechanism that stacks two or more mixture sheets (Fig. 1 p.1 ll. 70-74; p. 3 ll. 62-2 forming a vertical stack of at least two of said plurality of strips; two strips superimposed into a stack – 35 in a stacker device – 32 to form a laminated sheet of desired thickness); and a press-fusing mechanism that is provided downstream of the stacking mechanism and that integrates the stacked mixture sheets by applying pressure (Fig. 1 p. 3 ll. 100-108 compacting rolls – 36-37 which are downstream of the stacking device – 32 in Fig. 1 to produce a densified product of desired shape – 38). But Sherritt Gordan is silent as to its production apparatus being intended to be used for an electrochemical device, nor that the mixture sheets contain a binder resin. However, the apparatus of Sherritt Gordan is intended to be used in an electrochemical device and indicated by the products being formed of finely divided particle selected from metals, metal alloys, metal coated particles and mixtures thereof having a fine particle size and being densified (p. 1 l. 79 – p.2 l. 17) and, therefore, it is not germane to the issue of the patentability of the claimed structure. See MPEP § 2144.07. Moreover, Althues discloses, in the same field of endeavor, a method for producing a mixture sheet by means of a rolling device (Fig. 2 abs paragraph [0042] dry film powder mixture on a substrate – 4 dry film – 3), which is utilized in an electrochemical device (paragraph [0008] object of invention achieved by a method step of adding an electrochemical element) which can be used in electrodes for further electrochemical elements (paragraph [0044]). Althues further discloses that its mixture sheets contains a binder resin (paragraph [0020] whereby prior to the lamination of the dry film the substrate can be provided with a binder which can be a thermoplastic (resin) binder). It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the disclosure of Sherritt Gordan with the teaching of Althues whereby a mixture sheet production apparatus having a stacking mechanism that stacks two or more mixture sheets would also include a binder resin. One with this ordinary skill would consider this advantageous because an improved connection of the laminated (stacked) film (sheets) is thereby achieved (paragraph [0020]). Regarding Claim 2, the combination of Sherritt Gordon and Althues disclose all the limitations of claim 1 and Sherritt Gordon further discloses that the press-fusing mechanism has parallel rolls that face each other (See Fig. 1 and also Fig. 9 pl. 2 ll. 77-79 where the rolls are described as “co-planar”). Regarding Claim 3, the combination of Sherritt Gordon and Althues disclose all the limitations of claim 1 and Althues further discloses that an adhesion mechanism adheres the press-fused mixture sheets that have passed through the press-fusing mechanism to a current collector (Fig. 2 paragraphs [0039]-[0040] first roll has an adhesion-enhancing surface, second roll has adhesion-reducing surface to which the dry film adheres with subsequent lamination to a current collector provided with the thermoplastic binder with the adhesion enhancement, an electrode can be removed in a solvent-free manner). Note: From S. Lee “Current Collectors in Energy Storage A Comprehensive Guide to Materials and Applications – Definition and Function of Current Collectors “Current collectors are materials or structures that facilitate the transfer of electrical current between the active material and the external circuit in energy storage devices such as batteries and supercapacitors.” Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Sherritt Gordon and Althues disclose all the limitations of claim 1 and Sherritt Gordon further discloses a sheet forming mechanism that produces the mixture sheets using a forming roll (Fig. 1 p. 2 ll. 104-112 particles flow or are carried to the nip of conventional rolls – 22-23 spaced apart at a predetermined distance to compact the particles into a green sheet or strip – 24 to a desired thickness). Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Sherritt Gordon and Althues disclose all the limitations of claim 1 and Althues further discloses the binder resin contains a polytetrafluoroethylene resin (paragraph [0014] polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) binder). Regarding Claim 6, the combination of Sherritt Gordon and Althues disclose all the limitations of claim 1 and Althues further discloses the electrochemical device is a lithium ion secondary battery (paragraph [0044] described method is for continuous film production for battery electrodes including lithium ion batteries). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE K. SWIER whose telephone number is (571)272-4598. The examiner can normally be reached M-F generally 8:30 am - 5:30 pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at 571-270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WAYNE K. SWIER/ Examiner, Art Unit 1748 /Abbas Rashid/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 10, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583043
PROCESS CHAMBER WITH UV IRRADIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576259
Automatic Power Adjustments Based On Tubing State Detection For Tube Welding Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576566
FOAM MOLDING METHOD, CONTROL METHOD FOR INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE FOR FOAM MOLDING, AND INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE FOR FOAM MOLDING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565606
ADHESIVE SHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12539650
METHOD FOR MAKING EMBEDDED HYDROGEL CONTACT LENSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 322 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month