Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/634,363

C-ARM X-RAY IMAGING DEVICES WITH REPOSITIONABLE X-RAY SOURCE OR DETECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Examiner
TANINGCO, MARCUS H
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Turner Imaging Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
910 granted / 1125 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1157
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
54.7%
+14.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1125 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 9-16, and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 (US 20200196967 A1). With regards to claim 1, D1 discloses an X-ray imaging system comprising: a C-shaped support arm 30 (Fig. 1A); an X-ray source 10 [0028] contained in a first portion of the support arm near a first end of the support arm (Fig. 1A); an X-ray detector 20 [0028] contained in a second portion of the support arm near a second end of the support arm (Fig. 1A); wherein the support arm contains a repositioning mechanism 40 between the first and second portions that allows the location of the X-ray source and/or the X-ray detector to be repositioned relative to each other [0029] (Figs. 2A and 2B). With regards to claim 11, D1 discloses a method comprising: providing an X-ray device (Fig. 1A) containing: a C-shaped support arm 30 (Fig. 1A); an X-ray source 10 [0028] contained in a first portion of the support arm near a first end of the support arm (Fig. 1A); an X-ray detector 20 [0028] contained in a second portion of the support arm near a second end of the support arm (Fig. 1A); wherein the support arm contains a repositioning mechanism 40 between the first and second portions that allows the location of the X-ray source and/or the X-ray detector to be repositioned relative to each other [0029] (Figs. 2A and 2B); taking an X-ray image of a patient using the X-ray device (when properly aligned); repositioning the X-ray source or the X-ray detector [0030-0032]; and performing a medical procedure on the patient near the location where the X-ray source or the X-ray detector was previously located [0030-0032]. With regards to claims 2 and 12, D1 discloses wherein the repositioning mechanism can be expanded to move the X-ray source or the X-ray detector outside a field of a medical procedure in which the X-ray device is used to take an image without moving the rest of the X-ray device (Figs. 2C and 2D) [0030]. With regards to claims 3 and 13, D1 discloses wherein the repositioning mechanism can be rotated to move the X-ray source or the X-ray detector outside a field of a medical procedure in which the X-ray device is used to take an image without moving the rest of the X-ray device (Fig. 2E) [0030]. With regards to claims 4 and 14, D1 discloses wherein the repositioning mechanism comprises a joint, hinge, or linkage [0029]. With regards to claims 5 and 15, D1 discloses wherein the repositioning mechanism can be slid to move the X-ray source or the X-ray detector outside a field of a medical procedure in which the X-ray device is used to take an image without moving the rest of the X-ray device [0032-0033]. With regards to claims 6 and 16, D1 discloses wherein the repositioning mechanism comprises linear actuators, tracks, or a roller bearing mechanism [0033]. With regards to claim 19, D1 discloses wherein the free space between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector has been increased by at least about 5% when the X-ray source and/or the X-ray detector has been repositioned (Figs 2C-2E). With regards to claim 20, D1 discloses wherein the free space between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector has been increased by up to about 40% when the X-ray source and/or the X-ray detector has been repositioned (Figs 2C-2E). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7, 8, 17, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1. With regards to claims 7, 8, 17, and 18, D1 does not explicitly teach wherein the X-ray imaging system is configured to be portable or mobile. However, those skilled in the art recognize that portable X-ray imaging systems and mobile X-ray imaging systems were generally known in the art and provide convenience for patients who are unable to be moved to the radiology department for X-ray imaging (for example, patients in Intensive Care Units). Therefore, in view of the recited benefit, it would have been well known, obvious, and predictably suitable to one with ordinary skill in the art to modify D1 such that the X-ray imaging system is portable and/or mobile. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS H TANINGCO whose telephone number is (571)272-1848. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached on 571-272-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARCUS H TANINGCO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594041
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590895
METHOD FOR MEASURING FLUORESCENT DECAY IN PHOSPHORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590888
INFRARED ANALYSIS CHIP, AND INFRARED IMAGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582362
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COVERING A REGION TO BE COVERED OF A GANTRY OF A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576284
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING OPTIMIZING AND ADMINISTERING AN ENERGY THERAPY TREATMENT PLAN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1125 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month