Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/635,376

FOCUS ADJUSTMENT APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS AND LENS BARREL

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Priority
Nov 11, 2011 — JP 2011-247090 +6 more
Examiner
PHAN, MINH Q
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
NIKON Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 845 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
867
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 845 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
ifDETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 05/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant alleges that the scope of claim 1 is narrower than the scope of claim 2 of Patent ‘325, which requires only “the second time being different from the first time”, however said allegation is found unpersuasive provided that the phrase “the second time being different from the first time”, implies that the second time, which has to occur after the first time, therefore, the second time has to be larger than the first time since time itself is considered linear when it progresses in a straight, unidirectional path from past to present to future. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 2 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,474,325 (Patent ‘325). This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claim of the present application Claim of Patent No. 11,474,325 An interchangeable lens attachable to a camera body, the interchangeable lens comprising: a focusing optical system configured to vary a focal position of the interchangeable lens; a detector configured to detect a position of the focusing optical system on an optical axis of the interchangeable lens; and a transmitter configured to transmit a first value and a second value to the camera body, the first value indicating a first relationship between an amount of movement of the focusing optical system and an amount of movement of an image plane and being determined based on the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector, the second value indicating a second relationship between the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the amount of movement of the image plane, the second value being a minimum value of the second first relationship between the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the amount of movement of the image plane, when the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector is a first position, the first value is larger than the second value, and when the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector is a second position, the first value is equal to the second value, wherein the first value is a first coefficient corresponding to TI/TL where the TL is the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the TI is the amount of movement of the image plane, and wherein the second value outputted from the transmitter at a first time differs from the second value outputted from the transmitter at a second time, the second time being larger than the first time. An interchangeable lens attachable to a camera body, the interchangeable lens comprising: a focusing optical system configured to vary a focal position of the interchangeable lens; a detector configured to detect a position of the focusing optical system on an optical axis of the interchangeable lens; and a transmitter configured to transmit a first value and a second value to the camera body, the first value indicating a first relationship between an amount of movement of the focusing optical system and an amount of movement of an image plane and being determined based on the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector, the second value indicating a second relationship between the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the amount of movement of the image plane, the second value being a minimum value of the first relationship between the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the amount of movement of the image plane, when the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector is a first position, the first value is larger than the second value, and when the position of the focusing optical system detected by the detector is a second position, the first value is equal to the second value, wherein the first value is a first coefficient corresponding to Tl/TL, where the TL is the amount of movement of the focusing optical system and the Tl is the amount of movement of the image plane. 2. The interchangeable lens according to claim 1, wherein the second value outputted from the transmitter at a first time differs from the second value outputted from the transmitter at a second time, the second time being different from the first time. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MINH Q PHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3898. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at 571-272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MINH Q. PHAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2852 /MINH Q PHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
May 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704769
CAMERA SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVING LOCKABLE DAMPERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697641
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ULTRASONIC SENSOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692847
ACTUATORS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693583
MAGNETIC CAMERA MOUNT
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681043
ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE CONTACT PIN
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (-5.0%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 845 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month