Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/635,394

Intra Prediction Using Downscaling

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Examiner
UHL, LINDSAY JANE KILE
Art Unit
2481
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
324 granted / 404 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
442
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 404 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the application filed on April 15, 2024. Claims 1-20 are pending and are examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication No. 2022/0103813 (“Pfaff”), which corresponds to priority applications filed in June 2019 and June 2020, in view of the level of skill in the art. With respect to claim 8, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed, including A decoder (see Figs. 3-4, item 54, describing a decoder) comprising: one or more processors (see ¶¶71, 502-510, describing that the decoder may be embodied by one or more processors); and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (see citations with respect to element above, describing that the decoder may include a memory storing instructions executed by the processor), cause the decoder to: determine, from a bitstream and for a first block of samples in a video: an indication of an intra prediction mode (see Abstract, ¶¶62, 400, describing that the decoder may determine from a bitstream an indication of a selected intra-prediction mode for a current block, i.e., first block of samples); and a residual (see ¶¶56, 60, 62-63, describing that the decoder decodes a residual); generate, based on the indicated intra prediction mode being a Direct Current (DC) mode or a planar mode and using reference samples of the first block, a prediction of a second block of samples corresponding to the first block being downscaled (see Abstract, Figs. 7.1-7.4, items 18, 811, ¶¶68, 73, 118-120, 241, 286-290, 399-400, 410, describing that the system may determine that prediction mode is an intra prediction mode, e.g., a DC intra prediction mode or planar intra prediction mode, that generates a prediction of the current block/second block of samples based on a reduced set of neighboring samples, i.e., generates a prediction of a second block corresponding to the first block being downscaled using reference samples of the first block); and decode the first block by upscaling the second block determined based on: the prediction of the second block; and the residual (see Figs. 7.1-7.4, items 18, 813, ¶¶60, 63, 121, 126, 164-166, 231, 233, 243, 286-290, describing that the decoding process may also include subjecting the reduced/downsampled set of sample values to interpolation, i.e., upscaling the second block based on the prediction of the second block, and by use of the residual). Pfaff does not explicitly describe “downscaling” and “upscaling”, rather it describes downsampling and upsampling, using reduction and interpolation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing would have understood subsampling/downsampling to be a form of downscaling and upsampling to be a form of upscaling (see, e.g., Applicant’s Specification at 92, 108, 122). Accordingly, to such a person, modifying Pfaff to describe its subsampling/downsampling and upsampling as downscaling and upscaling would have been obvious. Accordingly, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses each and every element of claim 1 abve. With respect to claim 9, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein the decoding of the first block by the upscaling is based on the indicated intra prediction mode being the DC mode or the planar mode (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above, describing that decoding the current/first block using the upsampling/upscaling/interpolation process is based on ALWIP intra prediction which may be DC mode intra prediction or planar mode intra prediction). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 9. With respect to claim 10, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein the decoder is further caused to: determine an indication of downscaling based on the indicated intra prediction mode being the DC mode or the planar mode, wherein the generating the prediction of the second block is based on the determined indication of downscaling (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above and ¶96, describing that the ALWIP mode may be the DC mode or planar mode and that generating the prediction of the second/reference block may be based on a flag indicating downscaling). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 10. With respect to claim 11, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein the decoder is further caused to: reconstruct a residual block of samples based on the residual and the indicated intra prediction mode being the DC mode or the planar mode, wherein the second block is determined based on the prediction of the second block and the reconstructed residual block (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above and Fig. 4, items 34, 34’, 34’’, 42’, ¶¶ 60, 63, describing that the second block, i.e., current block is determined based on a prediction and reconstructed residual and that the residual may be reconstructed based on the residual and the intra prediction mode, which may be DC intra prediction mode or planar intra prediction mode). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 11. With respect to claim 12, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein to generate the prediction of the second block, the decoder is further caused to: downscale the reference samples of the first block; and generate the prediction based on applying the indicated intra prediction mode to the downscaled reference samples (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above, describing that the reference samples of the current/first block are downscaled/downsampled and that the prediction is generated by applying the intra prediction mode to those downscaled/downsampled reference samples). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 12. With respect to claim 13, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein the upscaling of the second block comprises one of bicubic, bilinear, or average upsampling of samples of the determined second block (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above and Figs. 7.1-7.4, item 813, ¶¶126, 244, 275-283, describing that the interpolation may be linear interpolation in both the vertical direction and the horizontal direction, i.e., may be bilinear and/or may include averaging). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 13. With respect to claim 14, Pfaff discloses the invention substantially as claimed. As described above, Pfaff in view of the level of skill in the art discloses all the elements of independent claim 8. Pfaff additionally discloses: wherein the decoder is further caused to: determine, from the bitstream and for a third block of samples in the video, a second residual and an indication of a second intra prediction mode; generate, based on the indicated second intra prediction mode not being either of the DC mode or the planar mode, a prediction of the third block using reference samples of the third block; and decode the third block by combining the second residual with the prediction of the third block (see citations and arguments with respect to claim 8 above, including Fig. 4, item 42’ and ¶¶407-410, describing that other intra prediction modes may be used that are not DC or planar and that additional blocks may be predicted using such modes and by combining residuals and predictions). The reasons for combining the cited prior art with respect to claim 8 also apply to claim 14. With respect to claim 1, claim 1 recites the elements of claim 8 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 8 also applies to claim 1. With respect to claim 2, claim 2 recites the elements of claim 9 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 9 also applies to claim 2. With respect to claim 3, claim 3 recites the elements of claim 10 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 10 also applies to claim 3. With respect to claim 4, claim 4 recites the elements of claim 11 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 11 also applies to claim 4. With respect to claim 5, claim 5 recites the elements of claim 12 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 12 also applies to claim 5. With respect to claim 6, claim 6 recites the elements of claim 13 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 13 also applies to claim 6. With respect to claim 7, claim 7 recites the elements of claim 14 in method form rather than apparatus form. Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 14 also applies to claim 7. With respect to claim 15, claim 15 recites the elements of claim 8 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 8 also applies to claim 15. With respect to claim 16, claim 16 recites the elements of claim 10 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 10 also applies to claim 16. With respect to claim 17, claim 17 recites the elements of claim 11 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 11 also applies to claim 17. With respect to claim 18, claim 18 recites the elements of claim 12 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 12 also applies to claim 18. With respect to claim 19, claim 19 recites the elements of claim 13 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 13 also applies to claim 19. With respect to claim 20, claim 20 recites the elements of claim 14 in non-transitory computer-readable medium form rather than apparatus form. Pfaff discloses that its decoder may be embodied by a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions executed by one or more processors of a decoder (see ¶¶71, 502-510). Accordingly, the disclosure cited with respect to claim 14 also applies to claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LINDSAY JANE KILE UHL whose telephone number is (571)270-0337. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached on (571)272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LINDSAY J UHL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2481 /LINDSAY J UHL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
May 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 19, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604000
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARTITION-BASED PREDICTION MODE REORDERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604030
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING VIDEO SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598329
SYNTAX DESIGN METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING CODING BY USING SYNTAX
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593032
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING VIDEO SIGNAL BY USING INTER PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587636
GEOMETRIC PARTITION MODE WITH MOTION VECTOR REFINEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 404 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month