Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/635,413

MULTIFUNCTIONAL SOFA DISMOUNTING AND MOUNTING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Examiner
KREINER, MICHAEL B
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zhejiang Anji Jiumu Smart Home Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
498 granted / 605 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
617
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1−6 are rejected under 35 USC §103 as being unpatentable over US Patent No. 11,406,192 to Wu in view of US Patent No. 9,629,466 to Griggs, Jr. (“Griggs”) and US Patent No. 12,232,630 to Chen. Regarding claim 1, Wu teaches a multifunctional sofa dismounting and mounting structure, comprising: a seat frame (chassis 4), two slots (first locking slots 5) are symmetrically mounted on both sides of the seat frame (fig. 2), an insertion block (second locking slots 6) is movably mounted inside the two slots such that the insertion block is slidably fitted with an inner wall of the slot (col. 3 lines 30−39), an inner armrest (rightmost portion of armrest in fig. 6 having second locking slots 6) is fixedly mounted on a side of the insertion block away from the slot (cf. figs. 2 and 6). One of ordinary skill in the art would interpret the chair of Wu as being a recliner having a movable footplate (see annotated figures 1 and 2 below, with footplate inside dotted-line box, which one of ordinary skill in the art would interpret as rotating about the annotated dot-dash line). PNG media_image1.png 838 1430 media_image1.png Greyscale Alternatively, Griggs teaches a recliner having a foot plate (footrest 18 on scissor mechanisms) is movably mounted inside the seat frame 20 by slotting (figs. 6 and 20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify Wu to have a reclining footrest as taught by Griggs so that the user can relax and elevate their legs after a long day. Wu teaches an outer armrest frame 32 threadedly connected to the inner armrest frame 32 by a plurality of steel pipes (col. 3 line 48 to col. 4 line 4; where seven steel pipes are shown connecting frames 32 in fig. 6). By contrast, Chen teaches an outer armrest frame 2 attached to an inner armrest frame 1, such that the outer armrest 2 is movably mounted on a side of the inner armrest 1 away from the insertion block, and a telescopic structure (by extendable and retractable assembly 3) is provided between the inner armrest and the outer armrest. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to replace the armrests of Wu with the armrests of Chen, because the armrests of Wu require a user to connect at least seven steel pipes with 14 fasteners in order to fix the outer and inner armrests in a fully deployed configuration, whereas the armrests of Chen merely require the user to expand the telescopic structure, which is a much simpler assembly procedure. Regarding claim 2, Wu as modified teaches that a back frame 11 is fixedly mounted on a side of a top end of the seat frame away from the foot plate (Wu fig. 2), two connecting blocks 5 are fixedly mounted on an outside of the back frame, the two connecting blocks are symmetrically arranged on both sides of the back frame (Wu fig. 2), a back ear (Wu 12, 13) is movably mounted on both sides of the back frame, a connecting groove 6 is provided on a side of the back ear close to the back frame, the back ear is arranged corresponding to the connecting block, and the connecting block is slidably fitted with an inner wall of the connecting groove (fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, Wu as modified teaches that the telescopic structure comprises a first two-part connecting bar (rightmost 7 and 8 in Chen fig. 10) and a second connecting bar (leftmost 7 and 8 in fig. 10). Although Chen teaches these as two-part bars, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to make each bar 7 and 8 as an integral one-part bar in order to give the armrest greater torsional rigidity and strength. Additionally, Wu as modified teaches a first sliding groove (rightmost 9 in Chen fig. 10), a second sliding groove (leftmost 9 in fig. 10), a first sliding bar 6, a second sliding bar 6 and a tension spring 20; and the first connecting bar is fixedly mounted on a side of the inner armrest, the second connecting bar is fixedly mounted on a side of the outer armrest, and the first connecting bar is arranged corresponding to the second connecting bar (Chen fig. 10). Regarding claim 4, Wu as modified teaches that the first sliding groove is provided inside the first connecting bar, the second sliding groove is provided inside the second connecting bar, the first sliding groove is arranged corresponding to the second sliding groove (Chen fig. 10), the first sliding bar is movable mounted on an end of the first connecting bar away from the first sliding groove by a bearing, and the second sliding bar is movably mounted on an end of the second connecting bar away from the second sliding groove by a bearing (i.e. the parts are hinged together, where one of ordinary skill in the art would understand this structure as being a bearing; see Chen col. 6 lines 25−29). Regarding claim 5, Wu as modified teaches that an end of the first sliding bar away from the first connecting bar is movably mounted inside the second sliding groove (with guide pin 10 of sliding bar), the first connecting bar is slidably fitted with an inner wall of the second sliding groove (fig. 10), an end of the second sliding bar away from the second connecting bar is movably mounted inside the first sliding groove, and the second connecting bar is slidably fitted with an inner wall of the first sliding groove (Chen fig. 10). Regarding claim 6, Wu as modified teaches that the tension spring is fixedly connected between the second connecting bar and the first sliding bar (at locations 21 in Chen fig. 10), and totally four sets of telescopic structures are arranged in pairwise symmetry between the inner armrest and the outer armrest respectively located on both sides (where Chen fig. 2 shows two sets of telescopic structures for one armrest, where the other armrest would possess the other two sets of the four sets of telescopic structures. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael B Kreiner whose telephone number is (571)270-5379. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at (571) 272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.B.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600458
AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600465
WINGLET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12570390
AIRCRAFT WITH DETACHABLE WINGS AND METHOD OF DETACHING ITS WINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569066
SEAT FRAME AND SEAT WITH SWITCHABLE SITTING AND LYING POSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564264
CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month