Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/635,849

POWER GENERATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Priority
May 25, 2023 — JP 2023-086056
Examiner
RODRIGUEZ, JOSHUA KIEL MIGUEL
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
114 granted / 152 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
96.6%
+56.6% vs TC avg
§102
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 152 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0035434 to Ideshio et al. (hereinafter Ideshio) in view of Japanese Patent No. 2004-239113 to Kojima. Regarding claim 1, Ideshio teaches a power generation device comprising: a cylindrical rotation member (FIG. 2, 22f) that rotates by a driving force from a driving force source (Paragraph [0018]); a first gear (FIG. 2, 26f) extends across a first axis and rotates integrally with the cylindrical rotation member (Paragraph [0018]); a second gear (FIG. 2, 28f) that is supported in a freely rotatable manner about a second axis, the second axis extending along a direction that crosses the first axis, and meshes with the first gear (Paragraph [0018]); a generator (FIG. 2, 4); a step-up gear that speeds up rotation of the second gear and transmits the speeded-up rotation to the generator (FIG. 2, 6; Paragraph [0027]); and the case includes a through hole through which the cylindrical rotation member penetrates (FIG. 2, portion of 22f going through 52). Ideshio does not teach a columnar support member; the cylindrical rotation member that, with a direction orthogonal to the first axis, the first axis being an axis of the support member, defined as a radial direction, is formed in a cylindrical shape surrounding the support member from an outer side in the radial direction, being supported in a freely rotatable manner with respect to the support member; a case that houses the first gear, the second gear, and the step-up gear, wherein the generator is supported by the case, and the case includes a first through-hole through which the support member penetrates. However, Kojima teaches a columnar support member (FIG. 2, 111); a cylindrical rotation member (FIG., 2, 50) that, with a direction orthogonal to the first axis, the first axis being an axis of the support member, defined as a radial direction, is formed in a cylindrical shape surrounding the support member from an outer side in the radial direction, being supported in a freely rotatable manner with respect to the support member (Paragraph [0016]-[0017]); a case (FIG. 2; 26, 27) that houses the first gear the second gear, and the step-up gear, wherein the generator is supported by the case (FIG. 2, 30), and the case includes a first through-hole through which the support member penetrates (FIG. 2, right side). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power generation device of Ideshio with the case and support member of Kojima to increase the stability of the structure. Regarding claim 2, Ideshio in view of Kojima teaches the power generation device according to claim 1, wherein with a direction along the first axis defined as a first axial direction, the support member includes a stepped surface (Ideshio FIG. 2, surface of 52) that faces a first side, the first side being one side in the first axial direction, a portion of the case in which the first through-hole is formed is arranged to come into contact with the stepped surface from the first side (Ideshio FIG. 2, surface of 52), the support member is fitted into the first through-hole (Kojima FIG. 2, right side), and a bearing (Kojima FIG. 2, left side, between 50 and 27) is arranged between an inner circumferential surface of the second through-hole and an outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical rotation member in the first radial direction. Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ideshio in view of Kojima and in further view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0251531 to Hotta et al. (hereinafter Hotta). Regarding claim 3, Ideshio in view of Kojima teaches the power generation device according to claim 1, wherein Ideshio further teaches the generator including a rotor that is arranged on the second axis (Paragraph [0016]). Ideshio in view of Kojima does not teach an inverter that controls the generator, wherein the step-up gear includes a third gear that is arranged on the second axis and to which a driving force from the second gear is transmitted, a fourth gear that rotates integrally with the rotor, a fifth gear that meshes with the third gear, and a sixth gear that rotates integrally with the fifth gear and meshes with the fourth gear, and with a direction along the second axis defined as a second axial direction, the inverter is arranged to overlap the sixth gear in a second axial direction view along the second axial direction. However, Hotta teaches a generator (FIG. 5, MG) controlled by an inverter (FIG. 5, 3; Paragraph [0041]), wherein a gear system including a third gear (FIG. 5, Go) is arranged on a second axis and to which a driving force is transmitted, a fourth gear (FIG. 5, Gi) that integrally rotates with a rotor (Paragraph [0045]), a fifth gear (FIG. 2, 45) that rotates with the third gear, and a sixth gear (FIG. 2, 46) that rotates integrally with the fifth gear and meshes with the fourth gear, and with a direction along the second axis defined as a second axial direction, the inverter is arranged to overlap the sixth gear in a second axial direction view along the second axial direction (FIG. 5; 3, 46). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power generation device of Ideshio in view of Kojima with the gear system and inverter of Hotta to provide more electrical control for the system and position the components in a more beneficial way depending on the intended use case and placement of the power generation device. Regarding claim 4, Ideshio in view of Kojima teaches the power generation device according to claim 2, wherein Ideshio further teaches the generator including a rotor that is arranged on the second axis (Paragraph [0016]). Ideshio in view of Kojima does not teach an inverter that controls the generator, wherein the step-up gear includes a third gear that is arranged on the second axis and to which a driving force from the second gear is transmitted, a fourth gear that rotates integrally with the rotor, a fifth gear that meshes with the third gear, and a sixth gear that rotates integrally with the fifth gear and meshes with the fourth gear, and with a direction along the second axis defined as a second axial direction, the inverter is arranged to overlap the sixth gear in a second axial direction view along the second axial direction. However, Hotta teaches a generator (FIG. 5, MG) controlled by an inverter (FIG. 5, 3; Paragraph [0041]), wherein a gear system including a third gear (FIG. 5, Go) is arranged on a second axis and to which a driving force is transmitted, a fourth gear (FIG. 5, Gi) that integrally rotates with a rotor (Paragraph [0045]), a fifth gear (FIG. 2, 45) that rotates with the third gear, and a sixth gear (FIG. 2, 46) that rotates integrally with the fifth gear and meshes with the fourth gear, and with a direction along the second axis defined as a second axial direction, the inverter is arranged to overlap the sixth gear in a second axial direction view along the second axial direction (FIG. 5; 3, 46). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power generation device of Ideshio in view of Kojima with the gear system and inverter of Hotta to provide more electrical control for the system and position the components in a more beneficial way depending on the intended use case and placement of the power generation device. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ideshio in view of Kojima and in further view of Japanese Patent No. 2002-316685 to Toba. Regarding claim 5, Ideshio in view of Kojima teaches the power generation device according to claim 1. Ideshio in view of Kojima does not teach a seventh gear that is arranged on an opposite side to the second gear with the support member interposed between the seventh gear and the second gear on the second axis, is supported in a freely rotatable manner about the second axis, and meshes with the first gear; a transmission shaft that is arranged to penetrate through the second gear and the seventh gear and is drivingly connected to the step-up gear; a first one-way clutch; and a second one-way clutch, wherein with one side and the other side of directions of rotation about the second axis defined as a first rotational side and a second rotational side respectively, the first one-way clutch is arranged between the second gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotation side of the second gear with respect to the transmission shaft, and the second one-way clutch is arranged between the seventh gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotational side of the seventh gear with respect to the transmission shaft. However, Toba teaches a transmission device comprising a seventh gear (FIG. 2, 25) that is arranged on an opposite side to a second gear (FIG. 2, 24) with a support member interposed between the seventh gear and the second gear on a second axis (FIG. 2, 21), is supported in a freely rotatable manner about the second axis, and meshes with a first gear (FIG. 2, 23); a transmission shaft (FIG. 2, 12) that is arranged to penetrate through the second gear and the seventh gear and is drivingly connected to an output; a first one-way clutch (FIG. 2, 26); and a second one-way clutch (FIG. 2, 27), wherein with one side and the other side of directions of rotation about the second axis defined as a first rotational side and a second rotational side respectively, the first one-way clutch is arranged between the second gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotation side of the second gear with respect to the transmission shaft (Paragraph [0020]), and the second one-way clutch is arranged between the seventh gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotational side of the seventh gear with respect to the transmission shaft (Paragraph [0020]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power generation device of Ideshio in view of Kojima with the clutch mechanism of Toba so the generator is provided with a more stable unidirectional output rotation. Regarding claim 6, Ideshio in view of Kojima teaches the power generation device according to claim 2. Ideshio in view of Kojima does not teach a seventh gear that is arranged on an opposite side to the second gear with the support member interposed between the seventh gear and the second gear on the second axis, is supported in a freely rotatable manner about the second axis, and meshes with the first gear; a transmission shaft that is arranged to penetrate through the second gear and the seventh gear and is drivingly connected to the step-up gear; a first one-way clutch; and a second one-way clutch, wherein with one side and the other side of directions of rotation about the second axis defined as a first rotational side and a second rotational side respectively, the first one-way clutch is arranged between the second gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotation side of the second gear with respect to the transmission shaft, and the second one-way clutch is arranged between the seventh gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotational side of the seventh gear with respect to the transmission shaft. However, Toba teaches a transmission device comprising a seventh gear (FIG. 2, 25) that is arranged on an opposite side to a second gear (FIG. 2, 24) with a support member interposed between the seventh gear and the second gear on a second axis (FIG. 2, 21), is supported in a freely rotatable manner about the second axis, and meshes with a first gear (FIG. 2, 23); a transmission shaft (FIG. 2, 12) that is arranged to penetrate through the second gear and the seventh gear and is drivingly connected to an output; a first one-way clutch (FIG. 2, 26); and a second one-way clutch (FIG. 2, 27), wherein with one side and the other side of directions of rotation about the second axis defined as a first rotational side and a second rotational side respectively, the first one-way clutch is arranged between the second gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotation side of the second gear with respect to the transmission shaft (Paragraph [0020]), and the second one-way clutch is arranged between the seventh gear and the transmission shaft and allows relative rotation to the first rotational side and restricts relative rotation to the second rotational side of the seventh gear with respect to the transmission shaft (Paragraph [0020]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the power generation device of Ideshio in view of Kojima with the clutch mechanism of Toba so the generator is provided with a more stable unidirectional output rotation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA KIEL MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-9881. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:30am - 7:00pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at (571) 272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA KIEL M RODRIGUEZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /TULSIDAS C PATEL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633804
ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE UNIT
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627196
Connector For A Linear Motor
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627206
ROTOR STRUCTURE OF ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617485
HUB ASSEMBLY FOR HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
4y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12587078
ROTOR, ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE, AND VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 152 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month