Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/636,465

Flexible Material Based On Resource Utilization Of Waste Finished Leathers And Waste Fabrics And Preparation Method Thereof

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Priority
Jan 23, 2024 — CN 202410093740.8
Examiner
HUSON, MONICA ANNE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Xinji City Baolong Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1101 granted / 1383 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1383 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshida et al. (U.S. Patent 5,153,067). Yoshida et al., hereafter “Yoshida,” show that it is known to have a flexible material based on finished leathers and fabrics (Abstract; Column 1, lines 16-22) comprising rubber powder (Column 5, lines 45-48; Column 6, lines 18-49: “waste” is broadly construed to include any available rubber that has been previously produced; particle~powder), polyester nano-powder (Column 5, lies 41-42; Column 6, lines 18-49: “waste” is broadly construed to include any available rubber that has been previously produced; particle~powder); leather powder (Column 5, lines 22-40; “waste” is broadly construed to include any available rubber that has been previously produced; particle~powder), and a curing agent (Column 6, lines 23-28: it is interpreted that a rubber curing agent would be used since there is rubber within the compound). Yoshida does not specifically disclose the claimed quantities of each component, however he does disclose various potential amounts (Column 5, lines 39-33). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use any appropriate amount of each component, such as the quantities claimed, because where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed by the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation (MPEP 2144.05 (II)(A)). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA HUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1198. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MONICA ANNE HUSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /MONICA A HUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742108
THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE SILICONE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING GAP FILLER USING SAID COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741404
Curved Plastic Panel And Method And Device For Processing The Same
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735551
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING BAS(2-HYDROXYETHYL) TEREPHTHALATE IN LIQUID FORM BY DEPOLYMERIZATION OF POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET)
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734750
UV CURING APPARATUS WITH LIGHT GUIDE AND IN-PROCESS RADIOMETRY
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728583
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FIBER BASED ARTICLES WITH STEAM MOLDING
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1383 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month