Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/636,594

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ELECTRODE, ELECTRODE, AND BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2023 — JP 2023-130508
Examiner
OWUSU-ANSAH, KAZIAH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/16/2024 was considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 - 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shin et al (WO 2019/089696). Regarding claim 1, Shin teaches a manufacturing method of an electrode (200) comprising: fabricating a first electrode layer (box 205) disposed on a current collector (box 230); and fabricating a second electrode layer (box 210) disposed on the first electrode layer (box 220) (Fig. 6, paragraph 93-96), wherein the first electrode layer is fabricated by electrostatic film formation, wet film formation, or rolled film formation, the second electrode layer is fabricated by rolled film formation (both layers fabricated by rolled film formation, “an active electrode material and a binder are combined, blended or processed to form an active layer mixture, and calendered or pressed to form a self-supporting active layer”, paragraph 34), and when the first electrode layer is fabricated by rolled film formation, at least part of a surface of active material particles used in the rolled film formation is coated with a resin that is different from polytetrafluoroethylene (“The binder may comprise a PTFE and one or more of a cellulose, a polyolefin, a polyether … ”, paragraph 55). Regarding claim 2, Shin teaches that the rolled film formation includes fibrillation of polytetrafluoroethylene in a mixture containing active material particles and polytetrafluoroethylene. ( “a process for forming an active layer can include fibrillizing the fibrillizable binder component”, paragraph 51, “The binder may comprise PTFE”, paragraph 55) Regarding claim 3, Shin teaches the resin different from polytetrafluoroethylene is polyvinylidene fluoride. (“The binder may comprise one or more polyolefins … the one or more polyolefins can include … polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)”, paragraph 55) Regarding claim 4, Shin teaches an electrode, comprising: a current collector (current collector) ; a first electrode layer (layer 1) disposed on the current collector; and a second electrode layer (layer 2) disposed on the first electrode layer (layer 1) (Fig 2, paragraph 74), wherein the first electrode layer contains active material particles and a resin having a polytetrafluoroethylene content of 0% by mass or more and less than 5% by mass, or contains active material particles of which at least part of a surface is coated with a resin different from PTFE, and fibrous PTFE, and the second electrode layer includes active material particles and fibrous PTFE. (both active layers comprise active material, a resin different from PTFE and fibrous PTFE, “the binder may comprise PTFE and one or more of a cellulose, polyolefin…”, paragraph 55, “a process for forming an active layer can include fibrillizing the fibrillizable binder component”, paragraph 51) Regarding claim 5, Shin teaches a battery, comprising the electrode according to claim 4. (“an electrode fabricated from an active layer mixture described herein may be a component of … a lithium ion battery”, paragraph 41) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAZIAH OWUSU-ANSAH whose telephone number is (571)272-0441. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABBAS RASHID can be reached at (571)270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAZIAH OWUSU-ANSAH/Examiner, Art Unit 1748 /Abbas Rashid/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month