Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/637,796

METHOD OF GRAFT PREPARATION

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 17, 2024
Priority
Apr 19, 2023 — provisional 63/460,480
Examiner
SHI, KATHERINE MENGLIN
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Smith & Nephew plc
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
693 granted / 884 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment In response to the amendment filed on 6/25/2026, claims 1-11 are pending while claims 12-20 remain withdrawn. The amendments obviate the previous claim objections, drawing objections and 35 U.S.C. 112 rejections. Therefore, those objections and rejections are hereby withdrawn. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 10, filed 6/25/2026, with respect to the prior art rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior art rejections have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of the amendments to claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites “further coupling an end of the passing loop construct to the adjustable loop construct”. It is unclear if this end of the passing loop construct is the same end as now recited at the end of amended claim 1, or if this end is referring to another/new end of the passing loop construct. Further, if it is referring to the same end as the end recited in claim 1, it is unclear how there is a further step of coupling this same end to the passing loop construct to the adjustable loop construct when this end is already coupled as required in amended claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-11 are allowed. Claims 12-20 remain withdrawn and should be addressed accordingly in the filing of the next response if claims 1-3, 5-11 are allowed in a Notice of Allowability. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regards to claim 1, the closest prior art of record, Hosseini et al (WO 2022/232126) in view of Spenciner (US 2021/0007840), discloses the invention substantially as detailed in the Office Action dated 1/28/2026. The prior art of record does not disclose or fairly suggest either singly or in combination the claimed method comprising, inter alia, coupling an end of the passing loop construct to the adjustable loop construct after stitching the passing construct around and through the graft at the second location. Instead, the end of the passing loop construct remains uncoupled to the adjustable loop construct after stitching the passing construct around and through the graft at the second location. Applicant discloses the advantage of such a configuration as shown in Figs. 5C and 5D and discussed in [0045]-[0046] of the published application. There is concomitant tension on a portion of the graft adjacent the first location (1) where the saddle end 704 extends around graft 1660 and also where the passing construct ends extend from graft 1660 (location (4)), closer to the free end 1660. By pulling on tool 725 (F) this concomitant tension helps to prevent the graft 1650 from folding. Therefore, in view of the prior art and its deficiencies, Applicant’s invention is rendered novel and non-obvious, and thus, is allowable as claimed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHERINE M SHI whose telephone number is (571)270-5620. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs, 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at (571)272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE M SHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702795
GUIDE APPARATUS FOR DELIVERY OF AN ELONGATE DEVICE AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702422
Detachable Coil Incorporating Stretch Resistance
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697117
SELF-CINCHING SUTURE CONSTRUCT APPARATUS
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697113
Rotator Cuff Repairs and Reconstructions
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697215
LOADING ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY APPARATUS FOR AN EXPANDABLE PROSTHETIC MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.7%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month