Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/638,721

APPARATUS FOR TREATING GERD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Examiner
GEIGER, RACHAEL L
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
93 granted / 109 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. Claims 348-349, 351-354 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pugsley, Jr. et al. (US 20020161381 A1). Regarding claim 348, Pugsley discloses a method of treating a reflux disease in a patient (para. [0001], [0025]) by implanting a movement restriction device (Fig. 2A including 205, 210, 220, 200) comprising a plurality of segments 205, 210, 220 the method comprising outside of the body of the patient, assembling the plurality of segments to form an assembled movement restriction device (i.e., the device is manufactured such that the segments are assembled and introduced into 215); introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient (para. [0034]); and placing the assembled movement restriction device against a stomach fundus wall of the patient (paras. [0034]-[0040]; para. [0010] discloses fundoplasty and fundoplication). Regarding claim 349, Pugsley discloses the method according to claim 348. Pugsley also discloses further comprising after assembling the plurality of segments to form the assembled movement restriction device, and before introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient, securing the segments in an assembled position by means of a thread or wire 200 (i.e., as shown in Fig. 2A; para. [0027]-[0028]). Regarding claim 351, Pugsley discloses the method according to claim 348. Pugsley also discloses comprising securing the assembled movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall by means of suturing (paras. [0034]-[0040] by way of wire 200 which acts as suture to secure the anchors) and/or stapling. Regarding claim 352, Pugsley discloses the method according to claim 351. Pugsley also discloses wherein securing the movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall is achieved by means of suturing (paras. [0034]-[0040] by way of wire 200) and/or stapling the movement restriction device to the stomach fundus wall (paras. [0034]-[0040] by way of wire 200; para. [0010] discloses fundoplasty and fundoplication). Regarding claim 353, Pugsley discloses the method according to claim 351. Pugsley also discloses wherein securing the movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall is achieved by means of suturing and/or stapling stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient to stomach wall tissue of the patient (paras. [0034]-[0040] by way of wire 200; para. [0010] discloses fundoplasty and fundoplication). Regarding claim 354, Pugsley discloses the method according to claim 351. Pugsley also discloses wherein securing the movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall is achieved by attaching together stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient by means of suturing and/or stapling(paras. [0034]-[0040] by way of wire 200). Claims 348-350, 355-367 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kagan et al. (US 2004/0092892 A1). Regarding claim 348, Kagan discloses a method of treating a reflux disease in a patient (para. [0010]) by implanting a movement restriction device 100 comprising a plurality of segments (i.e., attachment points as disclosed in para. [0134]), the method comprising outside of the body of the patient, assembling the plurality of segments to form an assembled movement restriction device (i.e., the device is manufactured such that the segments are assembled and introduced); introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient (para. [0131]); and placing the assembled movement restriction device against a stomach fundus wall of the patient (para. [0016] discloses the stoma is anchored in the wall of the stomach and specifically with relation to the esophagus which is directly attached to the fundus of the stomach and [0288] discloses one location for implantation of the device being in the fundus of the stomach; i.e., see also para. [0131]). Regarding claim 349, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 348. Kagan also discloses further comprising after assembling the plurality of segments to form the assembled movement restriction device(i.e., after manufacturing), and before introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient (i.e., but before use), securing the segments in an assembled position by means of a thread or wire (para. [0132]). Regarding claim 350, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 349, wherein the thread or wire is made from a biodegradable material (i.e., although not directly disclosed in para. [0132], para. [0219] discloses similar sutures being biodegradable). Regarding claim 355, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 348. Kagan also discloses comprising a step of creating a pouch (i.e., gastroplasty pouch as disclosed in para. [0131]) comprising stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient and invaginating the movement restriction device in said pouch to thereby fully enclose the device in the pouch (para. [0131]). Regarding claim 356, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 348. Kagan also discloses comprising a step of creating a pouch (para. [0131]) comprising stomach fundus wall tissue and invaginating the movement restriction device in said pouch (para. [0131]; i.e., see also para. [0271] which discloses the cardiofundal border which includes a wall of the fundus connecting to the cardia), wherein the steps of creating the pouch and invaginating the movement restriction device in the pouch comprise invaginating the movement restriction device such that the movement restriction device is not fully enclosed in the pouch, wherein the pouch is at least partly open (i.e., by way of a narrow passage as disclosed by para. [0131]) and exhibits only one opening (para. [0131]), or exhibits at least two openings. Regarding claim 357, Kagan discloses a method of treating a reflux disease in a patient (para. [0010]) by implanting a movement restriction device 100 comprising a plurality of segments (para. [0134]), the method comprising affixing a stomach fundus wall of the patient to the patient's esophagus (para. [0035] i.e., thereby creating a fold); outside of the body of the patient, assembling the plurality of segments to form an assembled movement restriction device (i.e., the device is manufactured such that the segments are assembled and introduced); introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient (para. [0131]); and placing the assembled movement restriction device against a stomach fundus wall of the patient (i.e., para. [0131]; para. [0035] against the fold). Regarding claim 358, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses further comprising after assembling the plurality of segments to form the assembled movement restriction device (i.e., after manufacturing), and before introducing the assembled movement restriction device into the body of the patient (i.e., but before use), securing the segments in an assembled position by means of a thread or wire (para. [0132]). Regarding claim 359, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 358. Kagan also discloses wherein the thread or wire is made from a biodegradable material (i.e., although not directly disclosed in para. [0132], para. [0219] discloses similar sutures being biodegradable). Regarding claim 360, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses wherein affixing the stomach fundus wall to the patient's esophagus comprises affixing a first portion of the stomach fundus wall to the esophagus (i.e., see para. [0010] which discloses fundoplasty and fundoplication and para. [0016] which discloses placing a stoma may be anchored to the fold; see also para. [0034]), and wherein placing the movement restriction device against the stomach fundus wall comprises placing the movement restriction device against a second portion of the stomach fundus wall (para. [0035]-[0036]). Regarding claim 361, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses wherein affixing the stomach fundus wall to the patient's esophagus is achieved by suturing or stapling (para. [0016], [0035]-[0036]). Regarding claim 362, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses wherein the stomach fundus wall is affixed to a lower portion of the patient's esophagus (para. [0016]). Regarding claim 363, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses comprising securing the assembled movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall by means of suturing and/or stapling (para. [0016]). Regarding claim 364, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 363. Kagan also discloses wherein securing the movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall is achieved by means of suturing and/or stapling stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient to stomach wall tissue of the patient (para. [0016]). Regarding claim 365, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 363. Kagan also discloses wherein securing the movement restriction device against said stomach fundus wall is achieved by attaching together stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient by means of suturing and/or stapling (para. [0016]). Regarding claim 366, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses comprising a step of creating a pouch (i.e., gastroplasty pouch as disclosed in para. [0131]) comprising stomach fundus wall tissue of the patient and invaginating the movement restriction device in said pouch to thereby fully enclose the device in the pouch (para. [0131]). Regarding claim 367, Kagan discloses the method according to claim 357. Kagan also discloses comprising a step of creating a pouch (i.e., para. [0131] discloses a gastroplasty pouch) comprising stomach fundus wall tissue (para. [0010] discloses fundoplasty and fundoplication) and invaginating the movement restriction device in said pouch (para. [0131]), wherein the steps of creating the pouch and invaginating the movement restriction device in the pouch comprise invaginating the movement restriction device such that the movement restriction device is not fully enclosed in the pouch (i.e., by way of a narrow passage as disclosed by para. [0131]), wherein the pouch is at least partly open (i.e., by way of a narrow passage as disclosed by para. [0131]) and exhibits only one opening (para. [0131]), or exhibits at least two openings. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RACHAEL LYNN GEIGER whose telephone number is (571)272-6196. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 5712724695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RACHAEL L GEIGER/ Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /BROOKE LABRANCHE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588923
DEVICE FOR PERFORMING A COSMETIC OR MEDICAL PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569361
DEVICES AND METHODS TO TREAT AND PREVENT DIVERTICULITIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564412
PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS PATHWAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558103
REPAIR ASSEMBLY AND REPAIR ASSEMBLY IMPLANTATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12539108
MEDICAL DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month