Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/638,986

MATERIAL FOR FLAVOR INHALATION ARTICLE, HEATING-TYPE FLAVOR INHALATION ARTICLE, AND HEATING-TYPE FLAVOR INHALATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Priority
Oct 18, 2021 — JP 2021-170066 +2 more
Examiner
EFTA, ALEX B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Japan Tobacco Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
449 granted / 757 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
808
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
91.0%
+51.0% vs TC avg
§102
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 757 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by LAUENSTEIN (US 2021/0244074). With respect to claim 1, LAUENSTEIN discloses a material for a for a flavor inhalation article for a non-combustion heating-type flavor inhalation article (Paragraphs [0036], [0079], [0087]) and is formed by mixing a mixture of cellulosic fibers (e.g., a cellulosic base material and an additional fibrous material) (Paragraphs [0073], [0074], [0093]-[0095]), with nicotine (e.g., the alkaloid material containing nicotine) (Abstract; Paragraphs [0030]-[0043]). The article is a tobacco sheet (Paragraphs [0004], [0005], [0036], [0038]). With respect to claim 3, LAUENSTEIN discloses that the fibrous material is present in the article in an amount of 7 wt % of the sheet (Paragraph [0098]). With respect to claim 4, LAUENSTEIN discloses a non-combustion heating-type (Paragraphs [0006], [0028], [0029], [0036], [0079]) comprising a tobacco containing segment that comprises the material of claim 1 (Paragraphs [0035]-[0036]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LAUENSTEIN (US 2021/0244074) in view of INAGAKI et al. (US 2011/0192408). With respect to claim 5, LAUENSTEIN discloses that article of claim 4 (See rejection of claim 4) for use in a non-combustion heating type application (Paragraph [0036], [0079]). LAUENSTEIN doesn’t explicitly disclose the non-combustion heating-type device. INAGAKI et al. discloses a non-combustion flavor inhalation article that includes a heating device including a heater to be heated to a temperature that aerosolizes a tobacco sheet in contact with the heater (Abstract; Paragraphs [0009]-[0012]; Figures 1-4) so that enjoyment of flavor is enabled without giving any care of annoyance to neighbors. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the heating device that heats the tobacco-containing segment of LAUENSTEIN, as taught by INAGAKI et al. so that enjoyment of flavor is enabled without giving any care of annoyance to neighbors Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX B EFTA whose telephone number is (313)446-6548. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Philip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX B EFTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677877
SMOKING SUBSTITUTE DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12642300
VAPORIZATION CORE, VAPORIZER, AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12617195
METHOD AND INSTALLATION FOR MANUFACTURING A FLOOR COVERING PRODUCT AND FLOOR COVERING PRODUCT OBTAINED HEREBY
5y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616245
HEATING ELEMENT HAVING HEAT CONDUCTIVE AND WICKING FILAMENTS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12593873
VAPOR GENERATION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.5%)
3y 0m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 757 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month