Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/639,296

FIBER TERMINATION ENCLOSURE WITH MODULAR PLATE ASSEMBLIES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Priority
Jun 24, 2011 — provisional 61/500,769 +13 more
Examiner
STAHL, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Commscope Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1127 granted / 1251 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1283
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§102
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1251 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 4 is indefinite because there is insufficient antecedent basis for "the bend radius limiters" as recited in line 10. No bend radius limiters are mentioned earlier in claim 4. Claims 5-9 are indefinite by dependence from claim 4. Claim 4 could be made definite for example by replacing "the bend radius limiters" with "wherein bend radius limiters are". Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 are allowed. Claims 4-9 would be allowable if claim 4 is suitably amended to overcome the indefiniteness rejection above. Regarding claim 2, US 6937807 B2 is regarded as the closest prior art of record. '807 discloses a telecommunications plate assembly comprising (see e.g. figs. 1 and 2) first and second plate assemblies 40 including adapter plates 126, bend radius limiters 128, and openings for fasteners 74. However '807 fails to disclose or suggest the recited particular connections of fibers between a multi-fiber adapter of the first plate assembly and adapters of the second plate assembly by way of a multi-fiber connector and a fanout arrangement. Regarding claim 4, US 2008/0292261 A1 (already cited in an information disclosure statement) is regarded as the closest prior art of record. '261 discloses a telecommunications plate assembly comprising (see e.g. figs. 8-12) a first structure 231 defining a rear plane and including fastener openings 280; a second structure 229 connected to the first structure, defining an intermediate plane 255 parallel with the rear plane and spaced from it by a first cable space (around the spooling portion 259); a third structure 223 connected to the second structure and defining a front plane 233 parallel with the rear and intermediate planes, and an adapter module 241 extending forwardly from the front plane and including adapters 401. '261 does not disclose or suggest the required second cable space between the front plane 233 and the intermediate plane 255. In contrast '261 includes passages 262 and 247 for routing a cable from the spool directly into housing 223. Conclusion The additional references listed on the attached 892 form are considered generally relevant to the subject matter of this application. Several of them disclose other examples of plate assemblies. Contact Information Examiner: 571-272-2360 Examiner's direct supervisor: 571-272-2397 Official correspondence by fax: 571-273-8300 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Should you have questions about Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Michael Stahl/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12613379
SPLICE-ON OPTICAL CONNECTORS FOR MULTICORE FIBERS
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613389
LOCKING RING FOR A CABLE CLOSURE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12596234
OPTICAL MODULE AND OPTICAL CONNECTOR CABLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591093
FACILITATING OPTICAL COUPLING AND BEAM COLLIMATION IN PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585117
WAVEGUIDE FOR AUGMENTED REALITY OR VIRTUAL REALITY DISPLAY
2y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.4%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1251 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month