Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/640,285

STEERING WIRES FOR BLOOD PUMP

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES
Art Unit
3700
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Magenta Medical Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
222 granted / 312 resolved
+1.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
569 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 312 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3, and 6-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brandt et al (US20210023285A1); hereinafter Brandt in view of Hoffman et al (US20140276051A1); hereinafter Hoffman . Regarding claims 1 and 15, Brandt teaches an apparatus, comprising: a blood pump ([0011] catheter blood pump), comprising: an axial shaft ([0065] elongate shaft 1610) configured for insertion into, and rotation within, a body of a subject ([0091] The proximal struts in proximal expandable scaffold 343 extend to and are secured to shaft section 345, which is coupled to bearing 361, through which the drive cable extends and is configured and sized to rotate - the entire device is inserted into the body); an impeller coupled to the axial shaft such that, as the axial shaft rotates, the impeller pumps blood of the subject ([0011] The pump portion also includes one or more expandable impellers); and a frame surrounding the impeller ([0071] one or more collapsible impellers can comprise a super elastic wire frame). Brandt fails to teach steering wires. Hoffman teaches one or more steering wires coupled to the frame and configured to extend from the frame, to outside the body of the subject, while the frame is within the body (fig. 6a-6d part 606d, 608d,610d,604d, [0114] the steering wires may be manipulated by the operator - if they are manipulated by the operator then they extend to the outside of the body of the subject). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of this invention to modify Brandt with Hoffman because there is some teaching, suggestion, or motivation to do so. Hoffman teaches that the motivation to include steering wires is that the purpose is “to permit selective articulation and bending of the distal end of the second lumen 1104” ([0127]). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. Brandt further teaches the axial shaft is coupled to the drive cable such that the axial shaft rotates with the drive cable ([0065] impellers are in operable communication with a drive cable 1612 - the shaft is a part of the impeller so if the impeller rotates then the drive cable should as well, [0082] the two impellers even though they are distinct and separate impellers, are in operable communication with a common drive mechanism (e.g., drive cable 1117), such that when the drive mechanism is activated the two impellers rotate together). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. Brandt teaches a drive cable, wherein the axial shaft is a distal portion of the drive cable (fig. 7 - part 1117 drive cable feeds into part 1119 shaft). Regarding claims 6 and 16, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of this invention to modify the combination of Brandt and Hoffman so that the steering wires comprise optical fibers because it constitutes simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results. The steering wires of claim 1 are generic and optical fibers are commonly used in biomedical applications, therefore substituting the generic wires of claim 1 with specifically optical fibers would have been obvious. Regarding claim 7, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Hoffman further teaches a handle comprising a steering control, wherein the steering wires are coupled to the steering control so as to be controllable via the steering control (fig. 17 - handle 1701). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Brandt further teaches the blood pump further comprises: a radial bearing, configured to radially stabilize the axial shaft while the axial shaft rotates ([0091] bearing 361); and a bearing housing that houses the radial bearing and is coupled to the frame, wherein one of the steering wires is coupled to the frame by virtue of being coupled to the bearing housing ([0091] bearing 349, bearing 350). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. Hoffman further teaches the steering wires are configured for orienting the frame (fig. 6a-6d part 606d, 608d,610d,604d, [0114] the steering wires may be manipulated by the operator, to guide a flexible transbronchial needle to a site of interest). Regarding claims 10, 17, and 18, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus of claim 9. Brandt further teaches the steering wires are configured to extend from the frame while the frame is within a left ventricle of a heart of the subject, and wherein the steering wires are configured for orienting the frame within the left ventricle ([0095] The sheath or shaft can be moved proximally (towards the ascending aorta “AA” and away from left ventricle “LV”) to allow for deployment and expansion of working portion 1104.). Regarding claims 11 and 19, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Hoffman further teaches one of the steering wires is coupled to a proximal end of the frame (fig. 11c). Regarding claim 12, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 11. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of this invention to modify Brandt and Hoffman and couple the steering wire to the distal end of the frame because it constitutes an obvious design choice. The steering wires must be connected to at least one end of the frame in order for the user to be able to manipulate it to achieve the purpose of the invention. Therefore, the steering wires must be coupled to either the proximal or distal end of the frame and choosing one is a simple matter of design choice. Regarding claim 13, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. Brandt further teaches a delivery tube coupled to the frame and configured to extend from the frame, to outside the body of the subject, while the frame is within the body, wherein the steering wires pass through the delivery tube ([0163] delivery sheath). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 13. Brandt further teaches a drive-cable-bearing tube coupled to the frame and configured to extend from the frame, to outside the body of the subject, within the delivery tube, wherein the steering wires are disposed between the drive-cable-bearing tube and the delivery tube ([0070] outer shaft). Regarding claim 20, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the method of claim 19. Hoffman further teaches a delivery tube is coupled to the frame and extends to the frame from outside the body of the subject, and wherein orienting the frame comprises orienting the frame by applying a force to the steering wire coupled to the proximal end of the frame while applying a counterforce to the delivery tube ([0112] Such assemblies may be manipulated by an operator to steer the needle to a site identified to be of interest). Regarding claim 21, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the method of claim 19. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of this invention to modify Brandt and Hoffman and couple the steering wire to the distal end of the frame because it constitutes an obvious design choice. The steering wires must be connected to at least one end of the frame in order for the user to be able to manipulate it to achieve the purpose of the invention. Therefore, the steering wires must be coupled to either the proximal or distal end of the frame and choosing one is a simple matter of design choice. Hoffman further teaches orienting the frame comprises orienting the frame by applying a force to the steering wire coupled to the proximal end of the frame while applying a counterforce to the steering wire coupled to the distal end of the frame ((fig. 6a-6d part 606d, 608d,610d,604d, [0114]) the steering wires may be manipulated by the operator). Claim(s) 4 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brandt and Hoffman further in view MacDonald et al (US 20100152523 A1); hereinafter MacDonald. Regarding claim 4, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. The combination fails to teach elongation resistant fibers. MacDonald teaches the steering wires comprise respective elongation-resistant fibers ([0019] Still other suitable materials for the formation of the struts include carbon fiber composites and/or other composites, such as aramid fiber (e.g., KEVLAR.RTM. brand fibers commercially available from DuPont; and TWARON.RTM. brand fibers from Teijin Co.), and glass fiber). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of this invention to modify the combination of Brandt and Hoffman with MacDonald because there is some teaching, suggestion, or motivation to do so. MacDonald teaches that “ultimately, one of skill in the art will appreciate that suitable materials include those that are spring-like (stiff and flexible), having a high modulus of elasticity (stiffness) and a suitable yield point (degree of stretch or bending at failure)” ([0019]). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Brandt and Hoffman teaches the apparatus according to claim 1. The combination of Brandt and Hoffman fails to teach the steering wires comprise aramid fibers. MacDonald teaches the steering wires comprise respective aramid fibers ([0019] Still other suitable materials for the formation of the struts include carbon fiber composites and/or other composites, such as aramid fiber (e.g., KEVLAR.RTM. brand fibers commercially available from DuPont; and TWARON.RTM. brand fibers from Teijin Co.), and glass fiber). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Dhrasti SNEHAL Dalal whose telephone number is (571)272-0780. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8:30 am - 6:00 pm, Alternate Friday off, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carl Layno can be reached at (571) 272-4949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.S.D./ Examiner, Art Unit 3796 /CARL H LAYNO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12350762
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HEIGHT CONTROL IN LASER METAL DEPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 08, 2025
Patent 12349847
MOP HEAD AND SELF-WRINGING MOP APPARATUS AND ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF WRINGING A MOP
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 08, 2025
Patent 12352306
Workpiece Support For A Thermal Processing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 08, 2025
Patent 12350227
BUBBLE MASSAGE FLOAT APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 08, 2025
Patent 12343473
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING HYPERAROUSAL DISORDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 01, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month