Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/640,400

CONNECTION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
DO, ROWLAND
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Gottlieb Binder GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
561 granted / 801 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
855
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 801 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Applicant is advised that should claim 4 be found allowable, claim 5 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3 - 12 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Straumann, US 2019/0040283. Regarding claim 1, Straumann discloses a connection system, consisting essentially of: a fastening part (4) that has at least one carrier part (nanostructures) with a plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair elements of the gecko nanostructures) connected thereto in one piece (see figures 1 and 3), wherein a head part (distal ends of the elastic hair elements; the head part of the fastening elements) of each of the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair) [are configured to be fastened at their free end faces by means of adhesion to third-party components (10) in a releasable manner]; and a closure part (6) and a further closure part (12), wherein the closure part (6) is firmly connected to the fastening part (4) on an opposite side to the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (figure 3), the closure part (6) having closure elements (14), which, when brought into engagement with further, correspondingly designed closure elements (16) of the further closure part (12), form a releasable fastening closure; wherein the further closure part (12), on its side opposite the further closure elements (16), [is configured to be fastened to a functional component with a connecting means]. Claim language set in brackets [] set forth above and below in this office action are considered by the examiner to be intended use that fails to further limit the structure of the claimed invention. Since the claimed invention is directed solely to that of the connection system, the prior art must only be capable of performing the functional recitations in order to be applicable, and in the instant case, the examiner maintains that the reusable system disclosed by Straumann (US 2019/0040283), is indeed capable of the intended use statements. Note that it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. Regarding claim 3, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, [wherein the connecting means is an adhesive]. Regarding claim 4, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein, between the fastening part (4) and the closure part (6), at least one layer (see a solid line between elements 4 and 6; see paragraph [0021] regarding a flexible carrier so that the tape 2 can be bonded to the flexible carrier) is configured to be inserted and consists of a flexible, inelastic material (e.g. a sheet of polymers), wherein it is a component, [designed as a further carrier part], of the fastening part (4). Regarding claim 5, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein, between the fastening part (4) and the closure part (6), at least one layer (see a solid line between elements 4 and 6; see paragraph [0021] regarding a flexible carrier so that the tape 2 can be bonded to the flexible carrier) is configured to be inserted and consists of a flexible, inelastic material (e.g. a sheet of polymers), wherein it is a component, [designed as a further carrier part], of the fastening part (4). Regarding claim 6, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein the fastening part (4) with its components (nanostructures), [for adhering to curved surfaces of the associated third-party component], is designed as a flexible component (tape 2 is flexible). Regarding claim 7, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein the fastening part (4) and the closure part (6) consist of translucent plastic materials (a polymer material is translucent). Regarding claim 8, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein the fastening elements of the fastening part (4), arranged in groups (when covered partly of the surface; paragraph [0016]), leave spaces between them, which lead to a visually recognizable segmentation (when the partly covered side 4 is considered). Regarding claim 9, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, [wherein the spaces left free between the groups of fastening elements (partly covered with the nanostructures) are used to accommodate functional components, such as electronic components, magnets, and imprints]. Regarding claim 10, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, [wherein the closure elements (14) of at least one closure part (6), arranged in groups (of hook elements), leave spaces between them, which lead to a visually recognizable segmentation]. Regarding claim 11, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, [wherein the spaces left free between the groups of closure elements (14) are used to accommodate functional components, such as electronic components, magnets, and imprints]. Regarding claim 12, Straumann discloses the connection system according to claim 1, wherein the closure elements (14) of the closure parts consist of hooks (14a), double hooks, mushrooms, loops, stems, multifilaments, and flocking fibers (or any other suitable structure that may mechanically couple with attachment counterparts). Regarding claim 15, Straumann discloses a connection system, consisting essentially of: a fastening part (4) that has at least one carrier part (nanostructures) with a plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair elements of the gecko nanostructures) connected thereto in one piece (figures 1 and 3), wherein a head part (distal ends of the elastic hair elements; the head part of the fastening elements) of each of the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair) [are configured to be fastened at their free end faces by means of adhesion to third-party components (10) in a releasable manner]; and a closure part (6) that is firmly connected to the fastening part (4) on an opposite side to the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (figure 3), the closure part (6) having closure elements (14), [which, when brought into engagement with further, correspondingly designed closure elements (16) of a further closure part (12), form a releasable fastening closure; wherein the closure elements of the closure part and the closure elements of the further closure part are the same structures]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13, 14, 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Straumann, US 2019/0040283 in view of Poulakis, US 2005/0268439. Regarding claim 13, Straumann discloses a connection system, consisting essentially of: a fastening part (4) that has at least one carrier part (nanostructures) with a plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair elements of the gecko nanostructures) connected thereto in one piece (figures 1 and 3), wherein a head part (distal ends of the elastic hair elements; the head part of the fastening elements) of each of the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (elastic hair) [are configured to be fastened at their free end faces by means of adhesion to third-party components (10) in a releasable manner]; and a closure part (6) that is firmly connected to the fastening part (4) on an opposite side to the plurality of stem-like fastening elements (figure 3), the closure part (6) having closure elements (14), [which, when brought into engagement with further, correspondingly designed closure elements (16) of a further closure part (12), form a releasable fastening closure]. Straumann does not explicitly disclose wherein the closure elements (14) consist of loop-shaped threads; however, Straumann has disclosed the closure elements (14) can be of any suitable structure that may mechanically couple with attachment counterparts. Poulakis discloses a closure part (14) having closure elements (18) wherein the closure elements (18) consist of loop-shaped threads (the part 14 is comprised of filaments 16 as pile threads; see figure 2). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the closure elements of Straumann to be consist of loop-shaped threads as taught by Poulakis to provide an alternative closure element shape for purpose of peel strength and abrasion reduction. Regarding claim 14, the combination of Straumann and Poulakis teaches the connection system of according to claim 13. Poulakis further teaches wherein at least some of the closure elements (18) of the further closure part and/or the closure elements of the closure part (14) include a cut laterally at a head end of the loop-shaped thread (see figure 1 and paragraph [0017]; cutting the loops 22, 24 open to produce a fastener hook which may engaging corresponding nonwoven or fleece material of another fastening element not shown). Regarding claim 16, Straumann discloses the connection system of according to claim 15 except for wherein the closure elements consist of loop-shaped threads; however, Straumann has disclosed the closure elements (14) can be of any suitable structure that may mechanically couple with attachment counterparts. Poulakis discloses a closure part (14) having closure elements (18) wherein the closure elements (18) consist of loop-shaped threads (the part 14 is comprised of filaments 16 as pile threads; see figure 2). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the closure elements of Straumann to be consist of loop-shaped threads as taught by Poulakis to provide an alternative closure element shape for purpose of peel strength and abrasion reduction. Regarding claim 17, the combination of Straumann and Poulakis teaches the connection system of according to claim 16. Poulakis further teaches wherein at least some of the closure elements of the further closure part and/or the closure elements of the closure part include a cut laterally at a head end of the loop-shaped thread. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed September 3, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The arguments are found not persuasive in view of the rejection of the claims as set forth above. Applicant has amended the claims to remove intended use; however, the claim limitations in brackets above are still considered functional limitations of the claimed system due to the transitional phrases, effectuated results, in the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 for similar art cited. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROWLAND DO whose telephone number is (571)270-5737. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30 - 7:00 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571) 272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.D./ Examiner, Art Unit 3677 /JASON W SAN/ SPE, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584537
CUSTOM FASTENED LOCKING STOPPING COVERED WIRE ROPE CLIP SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575649
APPAREL FASTENER HAVING INTEGRATED ADJUSTABLE TENSIONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575626
APPAREL FASTENER HAVING INTEGRATED ADJUSTABLE TENSIONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559002
LATCH CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550983
RATCHET BUCKLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (-5.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month