Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/640,483

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITIZING A SLIDE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
ATALA, JAMIE JO
Art Unit
2486
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Pramana Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5y 10m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
104 granted / 222 resolved
-11.2% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 10m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
232
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 222 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by D’Costa et al US 2020/0400930. [claim 1] In regard to Claim 1, D’Costa et al discloses a system for digitizing a slide the system comprising: a slide (Figure 2b); an optical system (Paragraph 0044-0045); and a computing device (Paragraph 0068) configured to: identify metadata associated with the slide ({paragraph 0068-0072; determine a first scanning parameter as a function of the metadata (Paragraph 0068); and using the optical system, capture a z-stack as a function of the first scanning parameter (Paragraph 0073). [claim 2] In regard to Claim 2, D’Costa et al discloses identifying the metadata comprises: capturing a first image of the slide (Paragraph 0068-0070); and identifying the metadata as a function of the first image by performing optical character recognition on the first image (Paragraph 0070-0073). [Claim 4] In regard to Claim 4, D’Costa et al discloses the computing device is further configured to determine a volumetric image set of the slide as a function of the z-stack (Paragraph 0073). [claim 6] In regard to Claim 6, D’Costa et al discloses a system wherein: the first scanning parameter comprises a magnification (Paragraphs 0135-0142); and capturing the z-stack as a function of the first scanning parameter comprises capturing the Z-stack at the magnification (Paragraphs 0135-0142). [claim 7] In regard to Claim 7, D’Costa et al discloses the first scanning parameter comprises a z-stack size; and capturing the z-stack as a function of the first scanning parameter comprises capturing the Z- stack such that the z-stack comprises a number of images according to the z-stack size (Paragraphs 0073). [claim 11] In regard to Claim 11, the claim limitations have been addressed in Claim 1. [claim 12] In regard to Claim 12, the claim limitations have been addressed in Claim 2. [claim 14] In regard to Claim 11, the claim limitations have been addressed in Claim 4. [claim 16] In regard to Claim 16, the claim limitations have been addressed in Claim 6. [claim 17] In regard to Claim 17, the claim limitations have been addressed in Claim 7. Allowable Subject Matter Claimsare objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMIE JO ATALA whose telephone number is (571)272-7384. The examiner can normally be reached 830am-500pm M-TH. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Colleen Fauz. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMIE J ATALA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12495143
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12477091
DEPTH-COLOR ALIGNMENT WITH ASSISTANCE METADATA FOR TRANSCODING OF VOLUMETRIC VIDEO
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12470733
OVERLAPPED BLOCK MOTION COMPENSATION FOR INTER PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12436545
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUSLY POSITIONING A CAMERA OF A SEWER INSPECTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 8385718
PROCESS FOR PROGRAMMING ACTIONS OF RESOURCES IN A DOMESTIC COMMUNICATION NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 26, 2013
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+37.3%)
5y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 222 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month