Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/640,948

SUPPORT FOR DISTANCE MEASUREMENT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Oct 25, 2021 — GB 2115331.7 +1 more
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The Stanley Works Israel Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
446 granted / 560 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
570
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-16 and 21-24 in the reply filed on 24 AUG 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-9, 11 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Miller (US Pat. No. 4,642,898). Regarding claim 1, Miller discloses: A support (FIG 1), 10, comprising: a main body 12 comprising an attachment part 25 for removably attaching the support to a tool (see col. 3, ll. 13-32); an adjustment part 40 attached to the main body and comprising a mount 50 for removably mounting a distance measurement device 41 thereto; wherein the mount is movable with respect to the main body to adjust a position of the distance measurement device with respect to the main body (col. 2, l. 52-col. 3, l. 3). Regarding claims 2-4, FIG 1 of Miller discloses that the adjustment part may be used as claimed. Regarding claims 6-8 and 11, FIG 1 of Miller discloses that the mount may be used as claimed. Regarding claim 9, FIG 1 of Miller discloses that the attachment part comprises a clamp as claimed. Regarding claim 14, FIG 1 of Miller discloses that the distance measurement device may be used as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miller in view of Eldridge et al. (US Pat. No. 5,333,391). Miller discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Miller does not disclose a ratchet mechanism or a rack-and-pinion mechanism as claimed. Eldridge et al. discloses a rack-and-pinion mechanism (see col. 3, ll. 5-16) used for the purpose of moving an adjustment device incrementally. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the rack-and-pinion mechanism taught by Eldridge et al. in conjunction with the Miller adjustment part to move the adjustment part of Miller incrementally. Claims 10, 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miller in view of Teetzel et al. (US Pub. No. 2007/0214551). Miller discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Miller does not disclose bayonet-fitment connectors as claimed. Teetzel et al. discloses bayonet-fitment connectors (see [0061]) used for the purpose connecting components in a measuring device. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the bayonet-fitment connectors taught by Teetzel et al. in conjunction with the Miller device for the purpose of connecting components of the Miller device together. Claims 15, 16 and 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miller in view of Shi et al. (US Pat. No. 10,627,201). Miller discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Miller does not disclose a distance measuring wheel or display as claimed. Shi et al. discloses a distance measuring wheel 2 and a display 3 used for the purpose of measuring distance. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the measuring wheel and display taught by Shi et al. in conjunction with the Miller device as an alternate means of measuring distance with the Miller device. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 6 OCT 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768634
ALIGNMENT GAUGE FOR VEHICLES
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768650
Utility Pole Guy Wire Anchor Point Locating Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768630
MEASUREMENT TOOL FOR A BRAKE AND RELATED BRAKE ASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761021
Digital Spirit Level
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754004
WHEEL BLANK INSPECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month