Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/641,109

GAMES, LOTTERIES, AND SWEEPSTAKES AND TICKETS, SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND METHODS RELATED THERETO

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 22, 2009 — provisional 61/289,096 +13 more
Examiner
TORIMIRO, ADETOKUNBO OLUSEGUN
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Multilot AS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
753 granted / 989 resolved
+6.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1025
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 989 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-7 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,011,027 in view of Czyzewski et al (US 2008/0096628). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the independent claim 1 (for instance) of the instant application includes at least most of the limitations, aside from slight difference in wording, of the US patent 11,011,027 limitations (as evident in the comparison table below). Furthermore, one skilled in the art would understand and recognize that they both disclose similar limitations including game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant- game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by an electronic game provider (see claim 1 of US Patent No. 11,011,027). Furthermore, one skilled in the art would understand and recognize that access credentials comprising the face of applicant game contestant, which is detectable using biometric/facial recognition technology would have been obvious in order to allow access from a contestant as a credential as taught by Czyzewski (see paragraph [0029], showing The verification may be entered by biometric identification systems (e.g., fingerprints, retinal scan, facial recognition, etc.)). The following claim chart shows the claim-to-claim comparison between independent claims 1 from both applications. 18/641,109 11,011,027 1. A game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant- game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by an electronic game provider; and wherein said applicant access credentials comprise biometric data of said applicant-game- contestant, which is detectable using biometric data recognition technology and which is compared to biometric data of said applicant-game-contestant stored in a screening database associated with said game network access granting hub. 1. A game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant-game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of third-party electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by a third-party electronic game provider. This is an obviousness-type double patenting rejection. Claims 1-7 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent No. 12,067,850. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the independent claim 1 (for instance) of the instant application includes at least most of the limitations, aside from slight difference in wording, of the US patent 12,067,850 limitations (as evident in the comparison table below). Furthermore, one skilled in the art would understand and recognize that they both disclose similar limitations including game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant- game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by an electronic game provider; and wherein said applicant access credentials comprise biometric data of said applicant-game- contestant, which is detectable using biometric data recognition technology and which is compared to biometric data of said applicant-game-contestant stored in a screening database associated with said game network access granting hub (see claim 1 of US Patent No. 12,067,850). The following claim chart shows the claim-to-claim comparison between independent claims 1 from both applications. 18/641,109 12,067,850 1. A game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant- game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by an electronic game provider; and wherein said applicant access credentials comprise biometric data of said applicant-game- contestant, which is detectable using biometric data recognition technology and which is compared to biometric data of said applicant-game-contestant stored in a screening database associated with said game network access granting hub. 1. A game entry and access granting apparatus comprising: a game network comprising data transmission equipment, at least one data processor, and at least one data storage device; said game network including hardware and/or software particularly configured to control said game network such that it operates to provide a game network access granting hub on which the following method steps are performed: an applicant-game-contestant electronically submitting applicant access credentials comprising identifying information to said game network access granting hub, accompanied by a request for access to a network of a plurality of games which are selectively accessible to applicant- game-contestants which have been approved for access to said game network access granting hub; said game network access granting hub receiving said applicant access credentials, processing said applicant access credentials, performing steps to verify a true identity of said applicant-game-contestant, and screening said applicant-game-contestant for criteria to permit or deny entry into said network of a plurality of games for participating in game play; wherein when said applicant-game-contestant is approved for access to said network of a plurality of games, said applicant-game-contestant is granted access to a plurality of third-party electronic lotteries, sweepstakes, or other games, administered by a third-party electronic game provider; and wherein said applicant access credentials comprise the face of said applicant-game- contestant, which is detectable using facial recognition technology and is compared to a facial image of said applicant-game-contestant stored in a screening database associated with said game network access granting hub. This is an obviousness-type double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Livesay et discloses method and apparatus for remote identity proofing service issuing trusted identities; Royer et al discloses communications system; Pazhoor et al discloses systems and methods for biometric key generation in data access control, data verification, and path selection in block chain-linked workforce data management. 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADETOKUNBO OLUSEGUN TORIMIRO whose telephone number is (571)270-1345. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri (8am - 4pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached on (571) 270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADETOKUNBO O TORIMIRO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640012
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME REBALANCING OF BET PORTFOLIOS IN THE PARI-MUTUEL BET ENVIRONMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640013
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME REBALANCING OF BET PORTFOLIOS IN THE PARI-MUTUEL BET ENVIRONMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623156
ONLINE VIDEO GAME SERVICE WITH SPLIT CLIENTS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12605618
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURING AND DEPLOYING AN ELECTRONIC SKILL-BASED ACTIVITY
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605619
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURING AND DEPLOYING AN ELECTRONIC SKILL-BASED ACTIVITY
1y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 8m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 989 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month