Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
DETAILED ACTION
Response to Arguments
PNG
media_image1.png
701
506
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Applicant’s arguments filed 1/2/2026 have been fully considered. They are persuasive in part only.
Applicant submits that the connection elements 119 are not directly connected the farthest circumferential element. See Fig. 7. Thus, the argument is not persuasive.
Applicant further submits that the connection elements do not extend toward the central axis. This argument is persuasive. Thus, this action is non-final.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schone US 9932990 in view of Loercher US 20210164495.
Regarding claim 1, Schone discloses a guiding grid (Figs. 5-8) in contact with an inlet of a fan, wherein the guiding grid comprises:
a plurality of circumferential elements (115) disposed concentrically relative to a central axis, spaced apart from each other in a radial direction, and forming different heights relative to a bottom surface in a side direction perpendicular to the central axis, wherein the heights relative to the bottom surface are reduced along the radial direction, and a closest one of the circumferential elements adjacent to the central axis forms a top height relative to the bottom surface, wherein the radial direction points outward from the central axis (Fig. 5);
a plurality of radial elements (114) connected between each of two adjacent circumferential elements, wherein the plurality of radial elements are disconnected with the central axis in the radial direction; and
from the farthest one of the circumferential elements a plurality of connection elements (119, Fig. 7) connected with each other through a farthest one of the circumferential elements, wherein the plurality of connection elements are directly connected with the farthest one of the circumferential elements and extend away the central axis (Figs. 7-8).
However, it does not teach that the connection elements extend toward the central axis.
Loercher teaches a fan grid comprising connection elements (18) that extend away from (Figs 3-4) and towards (Figs. 6-7) the central axis.
Because both Schone and Loercher teach that fan grid connection elements can extend toward or away from the central axis, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the direction the connection elements extend as taught by Schone by reversing the direction as taught by Loercher in order to achieve the predictable result of providing a connection means for the fan guard.
Regarding claim 2, Schone further discloses that the plurality of connection elements are disposed on the bottom surface and equally spaced apart around the central axis (Fig. 8).
Regarding claim 4, Schone further discloses that the plurality of radial elements are successively connected with the plurality of circumferential elements from inside to outside, and form a continuous straight line or a continuous curve (Fig. 5).
Regarding claim 5, Schone further discloses that each of the plurality of circumferential elements has an inclination angle relative to the central axis, and the inclination angles of the plurality of circumferential elements are increased along the radial direction outwardly, wherein the inclination angles are ranged from 0 to 90 (Fig. 5).
Regarding claim 6, Schone further discloses that the inclination angle of the farthest one of the plurality of circumferential elements relative to the central axis is 90 (Fig. 5).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN O PETERS whose telephone number is (571)272-2662. The examiner can normally be reached Tue-Sat, 12:00pm-10pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at (571) 272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/BRIAN O PETERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745