Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/641,146

GUIDING GRID

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — CN 202223433869.4 +1 more
Examiner
PETERS, BRIAN O
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
5 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
463 granted / 633 resolved
+3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
663
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
78.8%
+38.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 4/22/2026 have been fully considered. They are not persuasive. Applicant submits that Loercher does not teach radial or circumferential elements and thus it is not proper to be relied upon for teaching the connection elements facing toward the central axis. This argument is not persuasive since the design of the grid (whether honeycomb cells or a combination of radial and circumferential elements forming trapezoidal cells) bares no relation to direction of the connection elements or their function which is to secure the guard. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schone US 9932990 in view of Loercher US 20210164495. Regarding claim 1, Schone discloses a guiding grid (Figs. 5-8) in contact with an inlet of a fan, wherein the guiding grid comprises: a plurality of circumferential elements (115) disposed concentrically relative to a central axis, spaced apart from each other in a radial direction, and forming different heights relative to a bottom surface in a side direction perpendicular to the central axis, wherein the heights relative to the bottom surface are reduced along the radial direction, and a closest one of the circumferential elements adjacent to the central axis forms a top height relative to the bottom surface, wherein the radial direction points outward from the central axis (Fig. 5); a plurality of radial elements (114) connected between each of two adjacent circumferential elements, wherein the plurality of radial elements are disconnected with the central axis in the radial direction; and from the farthest one of the circumferential elements a plurality of connection elements (119, Fig. 7) connected with each other through a farthest one of the circumferential elements, wherein the plurality of connection elements are directly connected with the farthest one of the circumferential elements and extend from the farthest one of the circumferential elements away the central axis (Figs. 7-8). However, it does not teach that the connection elements toward the central axis. Loercher teaches a fan grid comprising connection elements (18) that extend away from (Figs 3-4) and towards (Figs. 6-7) the central axis. Because both Schone and Loercher teach that fan grid connection elements can extend toward or away from the central axis, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the direction the connection elements extend as taught by Schone by reversing the direction as taught by Loercher in order to achieve the predictable result of providing a connection means for the fan guard. Regarding claim 2, Schone further discloses that the plurality of connection elements are disposed on the bottom surface and equally spaced apart around the central axis (Fig. 8). Regarding claim 4, Schone further discloses that the plurality of radial elements are successively connected with the plurality of circumferential elements from inside to outside, and form a continuous straight line or a continuous curve (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 5, Schone further discloses that each of the plurality of circumferential elements has an inclination angle relative to the central axis, and the inclination angles of the plurality of circumferential elements are increased along the radial direction outwardly, wherein the inclination angles are ranged from 0 to 90 (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 6, Schone further discloses that the inclination angle of the farthest one of the plurality of circumferential elements relative to the central axis is 90 (Fig. 5). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN O PETERS whose telephone number is (571)272-2662. The examiner can normally be reached Tue-Sat, 12:00pm-10pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at (571) 272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN O PETERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jul 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667768
PORTABLE BALL NET STAND DEVICE FOR EASY DISASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLY
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655853
COMBINED FAN BLADE STRUCTURE AND AIR OUTLET DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643024
FOLD-UP FRAME FOR A PORTABLE BASKETBALL GAME AND PORTABLE BASKETBALl GAME WITH FOLD-UP FRAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636586
Swing Apparatus
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616890
AUXILIARY DEVICE FOR PRACTICING GOLF SWING POSTURE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month