Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/641,277

VARIABLE TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 10, 2021 — continuation of 12/060,726
Examiner
JACKSON, DANIELLE
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bijou Corp.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
586 granted / 896 resolved
+13.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
918
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 896 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yang (US 2005/0167343 A1). Claim 1: Yang teaches temporary structure comprising: a junction assembly comprising: a hub (comprised of 10 and 20), a plurality of hinges (21, located on 20), each of the plurality of hinges disposed on the hub (as seen in FIG. 2); and a plurality of brackets (40), each of the brackets attached to a corresponding hinge from the plurality of hinges (as seen in FIG. 1a), each of the plurality of brackets comprising two or more tines positioned on a distal end of said bracket (as seen in FIG. 2), a gap formed between the two or more tines (in which 50/511 is received); a plurality of posts (50), each of the plurality of posts having a post top end (near 10, 20, 40) and a post bottom end (distal end of member 54); and one or more soft panels (seen outlined in the figures there is at least one panel that comprises the tent cover, as seen specifically in FIG. 6, the panel is soft since it is foldable), wherein the one or more soft panels transverses a distance between one of the plurality of posts and another of the plurality of posts (as seen in FIG. 1, the outline of the cover shows the cover as extending between all four posts, with each of the four walls of the cover extending between two adjacent posts as evidenced by the bottom edge of the cover). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang (US 2005/0167343 A1) alone. While Yang does not explicitly state the exact dimensions of the brackets, more specifically the gap between the tines, it would have been obvious to change the size of the bracket to accept dimensional lumber since it has generally been recognized that changes in size involve only routine skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 137. It is noted that dimensional lumber can be as small as 1”x1” or 1”x2”, and having the tines be spaced apart by an inch or two seems reasonable given the size of most standard portable tents. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang (US 2005/0167343 A1) in view of Thomason et al. (US 3,244,186). Yang is silent on the construction of the cover/panel(s); however, does teach the panel(s) transversing all of the posts (50, as seen in the figures). Thomason et al. teaches a temporary structure comprising: a junction assembly (11-13); and a soft panel (1), the soft panel transversing two adjacent posts of a plurality of posts (as seen in FIG. 1), the soft panel is reversibly attachable to the temporary structure (col. 1, lines 10-14). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Yang to include a panel that is reversible, such as that taught by Thomason et al., so that the interior of the structure could be keep warm or cool depending on the desires of the user. Additionally, it is noted that it would have been obvious to make the cover be comprised of two or more soft panels since making objects separable requires only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 129 USPQ 348. If there were multiple panels each one would have to separately be attachable to the framework. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-12, 14 and 23-25 are allowed. Claims 2-5 and 16-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments It is noted that applicant has amended the claims by incorporating the subject matter of former claim 18, previously indicated as containing allowable subject matter in the office action mailed 1/14/2026, into independent claim 1. The previous indication of allowability for claim 18 has been withdrawn upon further consideration. Accordingly, claim 1 remains rejected over Yang for the reasons set forth in this office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIELLE JACKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2268. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 11AM-7PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at (571)272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DNJ/Examiner, Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
May 13, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723428
Modular System Including Shaft Segments Having Configuration and Breakdown Attachments
12y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703993
COLLAPSIBLE CANOPY
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692707
STANDING AWNING STRUCTURE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12662843
Collapsible Structure for Shelter
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642734
TWO-PART CANE SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.5%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 896 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month