Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/641,503

DYNAMIC TUNING OF AN RFID RECEIVER TO ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIALLY MAXIMUM RECEIVED SIGNAL STRENGTH

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Examiner
YALDO, ABIGAIL AMIR
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rfmicron, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
44 granted / 48 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
61
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 48 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 5-6, 13-14 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 5-6, Line 2 and claims 13-14, Line 3, note that the recitation of “when the captured second current response is greater than the captured first current response” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art, especially since such a recitation appears to contradictweaker than the captured first current response”, which appears to be a diametrically opposite limitation. Due to this inconsistency, it is not apparent whether these recitations are intended to be a conditional statement or two completely different outcomes that are cumulative, thereby leaving the boundaries of these claims as being unclear. Claims 6, Line 4 and 14, Line 5, note that the recitation of “selectively adjusting” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to what would characterize any adjusting as being “selectively” as opposed to the mere “adjusting” as defined in claims from which these claims depend, thereby making it difficult to ascertain the boundaries of these claims. Claim 16, Line 6, “the mirrored current reference current” was not previously defined earlier in this claim and not previously defined in independent claim 9 from which this claim directly depends and thus it is not clear to one of ordinary skill in the art what exactly is being claimed by this terminology, thereby causing a lack in understanding regarding the metes and bounds of the claimed subject matter herein. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 7-12 and 15 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1-4, 7-12 and 15 are allowable over the prior art of record, since the closest prior art of record to Watkins (US 6317027), while teaching tuning of an antenna circuit of a radio frequency identification (RFID) reader using an antenna and capacitor coupled to a tuning circuit and comparing responses during tuning, fails to teach or suggest the receiving by the antenna and capturing a first and second current response by a current field strength detector circuit, as recited in independent claims 1 and 9. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL YALDO whose telephone number is (703)756-1784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL AMIR YALDO/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603631
VARACTOR-TUNABLE RADIO FREQUENCY RESONANT CIRCUITS AND COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592469
DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FOR PROPAGATING HIGH-FREQUENCY WAVES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592471
COMPOSITE RESONATOR AND ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587166
LONGITUDINALLY COUPLED RESONATOR ACOUSTIC WAVE FILTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587156
MULTILAYERED FILTER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 48 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month